Enables using the high and high-adjusted symbol modifiers on thread local
storage modifers in powerpc assembly. Needed to be able to support 64 bit
thread-pointer and dynamic-thread-pointer access sequences.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47754
llvm-svn: 334856
Add support for the "@high" and "@higha" symbol modifiers in powerpc64 assembly.
The modifiers represent accessing the segment consiting of bits 16-31 of a
64-bit address/offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47729
llvm-svn: 334855
redundant-vf2-cost.ll is X86 specific. Moved from
test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/redundant-vf2-cost.ll to
test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/redundant-vf2-cost.ll
llvm-svn: 334854
Added a Generic x86 cpu set of resource tests to allow us to check all ISAs.
We currently use SandyBridge as our generic CPU model, but it's better if we actually duplicate these tests for if/when we change the model, it also means we don't end up polluting the SandyBridge folder with tests for ISAs it doesn't support.
llvm-svn: 334853
Don't hardcode the architecture for Fuzzer tests which breaks when
compiler-rt is being compiled for architectures other than x86_64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48207
llvm-svn: 334852
An earlier commit prevented folds from the peephole pass by checking for IMPLICIT_DEF. But later in the pipeline IMPLICIT_DEF just becomes and Undef flag on the input register so we need to check for that case too.
llvm-svn: 334848
When coalescing a small register into a subregister of a larger register,
if the larger register is rematerialized, the function updateRegDefUses
can add an <undef> flag to the rematerialized definition (since it's
treating it as only definining the coalesced subregister). While with that
assumption doing so is not incorrect, make sure to remove the flag later
on after the call to updateRegDefUses.
llvm-svn: 334845
Summary:
When iterating users of a multiply in processUMulZExtIdiom, the
call to setOperand in the truncation case may replace the use
being visited; make sure the iterator has been advanced before
doing that replacement.
Reviewers: majnemer, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48192
llvm-svn: 334844
Summary:
The current `FailureHandler` mechanism was fairly opaque with regard to the
failure reason due to using `CHECK(0)`. Scudo is a bit different from the other
Sanitizers as it prefers to avoid spurious processing in its failure path. So
we just `dieWithMessage` using a somewhat explicit string.
Adapted the tests for the new strings.
While this takes care of the `OnBadRequest` & `OnOOM` failures, the next step
is probably to migrate the other Scudo failures in the same failes (header
corruption, invalid state and so on).
Reviewers: alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: filcab, mgorny, delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48199
llvm-svn: 334843
We were unnecessarily going from SmallString to std::string just to
get a null-terminated C string. So just...don't do that. Crash
slightly faster!
llvm-svn: 334841
This is a minor fix for LV cost model, where the cost for VF=2 was
computed twice when the vectorization of the loop was forced without
specifying a VF.
Reviewers: xusx595, hsaito, fhahn, mkuper
Reviewed By: hsaito, xusx595
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48048
llvm-svn: 334840
Increment/decrement scalar register by (scaled) element count given by
predicate pattern, e.g. 'incw x0, all, mul #4'.
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, SjoerdMeijer, samparker, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47713
llvm-svn: 334838
Try to access pieces 4 bytes at a time. This helps
various hasOneUse extract_vector_elt combines, such
as load width reductions.
Avoids test regressions in a future commit.
llvm-svn: 334836
Summary:
While that is indeed a quite interesting summary stat,
there are cases where it does not really add anything
other than consuming extra lines.
Declutters the output of D48190.
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, craig.topper
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48209
llvm-svn: 334833
Summary:
There does not seem to be any other tests for this.
Split off from D47676.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, courbet, andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48190
llvm-svn: 334832
This is r334704 (which was reverted in r334732) with a fix for
types like x86_fp80. We need to use getTypeAllocSizeInBits and
not getTypeStoreSizeInBits to avoid dropping debug info for
such types.
Original commit msg:
> Summary:
> Do not convert a DbgDeclare to DbgValue if the store
> instruction only refer to a fragment of the variable
> described by the DbgDeclare.
>
> Problem was seen when for example having an alloca for an
> array or struct, and there were stores to individual elements.
> In the past we inserted a DbgValue intrinsics for each store,
> just as if the store wrote the whole variable.
>
> When handling store instructions we insert a DbgValue that
> indicates that the variable is "undefined", as we do not know
> which part of the variable that is updated by the store.
>
> When ConvertDebugDeclareToDebugValue is used with a load/phi
> instruction we assert that the referenced value is large enough
> to cover the whole variable. Afaict this should be true for all
> scenarios where those methods are used on trunk. If the assert
> blows in the future I guess we could simply skip to insert a
> dbg.value instruction.
>
> In the future I think we should examine which part of the variable
> that is accessed, and add a DbgValue instrinsic with an appropriate
> DW_OP_LLVM_fragment expression.
>
> Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, rnk
>
> Reviewed By: aprantl
>
> Subscribers: JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
>
> Tags: #debug-info
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48024
llvm-svn: 334830
Summary:
For completion items that would trigger include insertions (i.e. index symbols
that are not #included yet), add a visual indicator "+" before the completion
label. The inserted headers will appear in the completion detail.
Open to suggestions for better visual indicators; "+" was picked because it
seems cleaner than a few other candidates I've tried (*, #, @ ...).
The displayed header would be like a/b/c.h (without quote) or <vector> for system
headers. I didn't add quotation or "#include" because they can take up limited
space and do not provide additional information after users know what the
headers are. I think a header alone should be obvious for users to infer that
this is an include header..
To align indentation, also prepend ' ' to labels of candidates that would not
trigger include insertions (only for completions where index results are
possible).
Vim:
{F6357587}
vscode:
{F6357589}
{F6357591}
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov, hokein
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48163
llvm-svn: 334828
Some instructions require of a limited set of FP immediates as operands,
for example '#0.5 or #1.0' for SVE's FADD instruction.
This patch adds support for parsing and printing such FP immediates as
exact values (e.g. #0.499999 is not accepted for #0.5).
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, SjoerdMeijer, samparker, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47711
llvm-svn: 334826
Summary:
Adds a CodeCompleteOption to folds together compatible function/method overloads
into a single item. This feels pretty good (for editors with signatureHelp
support), but has limitations.
This happens in the code completion merge step, so there may be inconsistencies
(e.g. if only one overload made it into the index result list, no folding).
We don't want to bundle together completions that have different side-effects
(include insertion), because we can't constructo a coherent CompletionItem.
This may be confusing for users, as the reason for non-bundling may not
be immediately obvious. (Also, the implementation seems a little fragile)
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47957
llvm-svn: 334822
Summary:
We already do it for splat constants, but not just values.
Also, undef cases are mostly non-functional.
The original commit was reverted because
it broke tests for amdgpu backend, which i didn't check.
Now, the backed was updated to recognize these new
patterns, so we are good.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37603https://rise4fun.com/Alive/cplX
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, mareko, bogner, rampitec, nhaehnle, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel, rampitec, nhaehnle
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47980
llvm-svn: 334818
Summary: The same pattern as D48010, but this one is IR-canonical as of D47428.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48012
llvm-svn: 334817
Summary:
As a followup for D48007.
Since we already handle `x << (bitwidth - y) >> (bitwidth - y)` pattern,
which does not have ub for both the edge cases (`y == 0`, `y == bitwidth`),
i think also handling a pattern that is ub for `y == bitwidth` should be fine.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48010
llvm-svn: 334816
Summary:
D47980 will canonicalize the `x << (32 - y) >> (32 - y)`,
which is the pattern the AMDGPU expects to `x & (-1 >> (32 - y))`,
which is not recognized by AMDGPU.
Thus, it needs to be recognized, too.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48007
llvm-svn: 334815
Instruction bundling is only supported on descendants of the
MCEncodedFragment type. By moving the bundling functionality and
MCSubtargetInfo to this class it makes it easier to set and extract the
MCSubtargetInfo when it is necessary.
This is a refactoring change that will make it easier to pass the
MCSubtargetInfo through to writeNops when nop padding is required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45959
llvm-svn: 334814
Summary:
Also move unittest: URI scheme to TestFS so that it can be shared by
different tests.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47935
llvm-svn: 334810
Summary:
This allows dynamic index to have consistent URI schemes with the
static index which can have customized URI schemes, which would make file
proximity scoring based on URIs easier.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47931
llvm-svn: 334809
Summary:
Like the following:
// -------
// =======
// *******
It does not cover all the cases, but those are definitely not very
useful.
Reviewers: sammccall, ioeric, hokein
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48171
llvm-svn: 334807
Sean Fertile