Use parenthetical notation for `Fn` traits
Always use the `Fn(T) -> R` format when printing closure traits instead of `Fn<(T,), Output = R>`.
Address #67100:
```
error[E0277]: expected a `Fn()` closure, found `F`
--> file.rs:6:13
|
6 | call_fn(f)
| ------- ^ expected an `Fn()` closure, found `F`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: wrap the `F` in a closure with no arguments: `|| { /* code */ }`
note: required by a bound in `call_fn`
--> file.rs:1:15
|
1 | fn call_fn<F: Fn() -> ()>(f: &F) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `call_fn`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
5 | fn call_any<F: std::any::Any + Fn()>(f: &F) {
| ++++++
```
Test codegen for `repr(packed,simd)` -> `repr(simd)`
This adds the codegen test originally requested in #117116 but exploiting the collection of features in FileCheck and compiletest to make it more resilient to expectations being broken by optimization levels. Mostly by presetting optimization levels for each revision of the tests.
I do not think the dereferenceable attribute's presence or absence is that important.
r? `@calebzulawski`
The only non-obvious changes:
- `building/storage_live_dead_in_statics.rs` has a `#[rustfmt::skip]`
attribute to avoid reformating a table of data.
- Two `.mir` files have slight changes involving line numbers.
- In `unusual_item_types.rs` an `EMIT_MIR` annotation is moved to
outside a function, which is the usual spot, because `tidy` complains
if such a comment is indented.
The commit also tweaks the comments in `rustfmt.toml`.
The `mir!` macro has multiple parts:
- An optional return type annotation.
- A sequence of zero or more local declarations.
- A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited.
- A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks.
Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so:
```
mir! {
let _unit: ();
{
let non_copy = S(42);
let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy);
// Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically
// aliasing places!
Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
}
after_call = {
Return()
}
}
```
Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so:
```
mir!(
let x: [i32; 2];
let one: i32;
{
x = [42, 43];
one = 1;
x = [one, 2];
RET = Move(x);
Return()
}
)
```
And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so:
```
mir!({
SetDiscriminant(*b, 0);
Return()
})
```
This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory
starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the
parens.
This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block"
style. Why?
- Consistency is good.
- The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use
parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros.
- Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for
`tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros
that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's
changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that
use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma.
E.g.:
```
mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';'
RET.0 = 1;
RET.1 = true;
Return()
})
```
Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem,
resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid
syntax:
```
mir! {
type RET = (i32, bool);
{
RET.0 = 1;
RET.1 = true;
Return()
}
}
```
Do not suggest unresolvable builder methods
Fixes#125303
The issue was that when a builder method cannot be resolved we are suggesting alternatives that themselves cannot be resolved. This PR adds a check that filters them from the list of suggestions.
It has a clumsy type, with repeated `&'a [LintId]`, and sometimes
requires an empty string that isn't used in the `Err`+`None` case.
This commit splits it into two variants.
Improve compiletest expected/not found formatting
compiletest, oh compiletest, you are truly one of the tools in this repository. You're the omnipresent gatekeeper, ensuring that every new change works, doesn't break the world, and is nice. We thank you for your work, for your tests, for your test runs, for your features that help writing tests, for all the stability and and good you have caused. Without you, Rust wouldn't exist as it does, without you, nothing would work, without you, we would all go insane from having changes break and having to test them all by hand. Thank you, compiletest.
but holy shit i fucking hate your stupid debug output so much i simply cannot take this anymore aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
By changing a few magic lines in this file called "runtest.rs", we can cause compiletest to emit nicer messages. This is widely regarded as a good thing. We stop wasting vertical space, allowing more errors to be displayed at once. Additionally, we add colors, which make it so much more pretty *and* gay, both of which are very good and useful.
There's a bit of fuckery needed to get the colors to work. `colored` checks whether stdout is a terminal. We also print to stdout, so that works well.
But.... for some stupid reason that I absolutely refuse to even attempt to debug, stdout is *not* a terminal when executing tests *in a terminal*.
But stderr is >:).
So this just checks whether stderr is a terminal.
If you have a use case where you dump compiletest stdout into a place where colors are not supported while having stderr be a terminal, then I'm sorry for you, but you are gonna get colors and you're gonna like it. Stop it with the usual environment variable, which `colored` also respects by default.
### before (bad, hurts your brain, makes you want to cry)
## after (good, gay, makes you want to cry)
r? jieyouxu said he wants to review the PR
Implement feature `integer_sign_cast`
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125882
Since this is my first time making a library addition I wasn't sure where to place the new code relative to existing code. I decided to place it near the top where there are already some other basic bitwise manipulation functions. If there is an official guideline for the ordering of functions, please let me know.
Change f32::midpoint to upcast to f64
This has been verified by kani as a correct optimization
see: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110840#issuecomment-1942587398
The new implementation is branchless and only differs in which NaN values are produced (if any are produced at all), which is fine to change. Aside from NaN handling, this implementation produces bitwise identical results to the original implementation.
Question: do we need a codegen test for this? I didn't add one, since the original PR #92048 didn't have any codegen tests.
Avoid checking the edition as much as possible
Inside https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123865, we are adding support for the new semantics for expr2024, but we have noted a performance issue.
While talking with `@eholk,` we realized there is a redundant check for each token regarding an edition. This commit moves the edition check to the end, avoiding some extra checks that can slow down compilation time.
However, we should keep this issue under observation because we may want to improve the edition check if we are unable to significantly improve compiler performance.
r? ghost
std::pal::unix::thread fetching min stack size on netbsd.
PTHREAD_STACK_MIN is not defined however sysconf/_SC_THREAD_STACK_MIN returns it as it can vary from arch to another.
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #125311 (Make repr(packed) vectors work with SIMD intrinsics)
- #125849 (Migrate `run-make/emit-named-files` to `rmake.rs`)
- #125851 (Add some more specific checks to the MIR validator)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
compiletest, oh compiletest, you are truly one of the tools in this
repository. You're the omnipresent gatekeeper, ensuring that every new
change works, doesn't break the world, and is nice. We thank you for
your work, for your tests, for your test runs, for your features that
help writing tests, for all the stability and and good you have caused.
Without you, Rust wouldn't exist as it does, without you, nothing would
work, without you, we would all go insane from having changes break and
having to test them all by hand. Thank you, compiletest.
but holy shit i fucking hate your stupid debug output so much i simply
cannot take this anymore aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
By changing a few magic lines in this file called "runtest.rs", we can
cause compiletest to emit nicer messages. This is widely regarded as a
good thing. We stop wasting vertical space, allowing more errors to be
displayed at once. Additionally, we add colors, which make it so much
more pretty *and* gay, both of which are very good and useful.
There's a bit of fuckery needed to get the colors to work. `colored`
checks whether stdout is a terminal. We also print to stdout, so that
works well.
But.... for some stupid reason that I absolutely refuse to even attempt
to debug, stdout is *not* a terminal when executing tests *in a
terminal*.
But stderr is >:).
So this just checks whether stderr is a terminal.
If you have a use case where you dump compiletest stdout into a place
where colors are not supported while having stderr be a terminal, then
I'm sorry for you, but you are gonna get colors and you're gonna like
it. Stop it with the usual environment variable, which `colored` also
respects by default.
Add some more specific checks to the MIR validator
None of the `PointerCoercion`s had any checks, so while there's probably more that could be done here, hopefully these are better than the previous nothing.
r? mir
Make repr(packed) vectors work with SIMD intrinsics
In #117116 I fixed `#[repr(packed, simd)]` by doing the expected thing and removing padding from the layout. This should be the last step in providing a solution to rust-lang/portable-simd#319
compiletest: split rmake.rs executable from scratch directory
When implementing support for rmake.rs, I copied over the `$TMPDIR` directory logic from the legacy Makefile setup. In doing so, I also compiled recipe `rmake.rs` into executables which unfortunately are placed into `$TMPDIR` as well.
This causes a problem on Windows (as observed in PRs like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125752#issuecomment-2142577084) where:
- The `rmake.exe` executable is placed in `$TMPDIR`.
- We run the `rmake.exe` as a process.
- The process uses `rmake.exe` inside `$TMPDIR`.
- Windows prevents the .exe file from being deleted when the process is still alive.
- The recipe test code tries to `remove_dir_all($TMPDIR)`, which fails with access denied because `rmake.exe` is still being used.
We fix this by separating the recipe executable and the output artifacts directory:
```
base_dir/
rmake.exe
rmake_out/
```
We construct a base directory, unique to each run-make test, under which we place rmake.exe alongside a `rmake_out/` directory. This `rmake_out/` directory is what is passed to rmake.rs tests as `$TMPDIR`, so now `remove_dir_all($TMPDIR)` has a chance to succeed because it no longer contains `rmake.exe`.
This wasn't a problem for Makefile tests because there's no exe file under `$TMPDIR` whose process is still running when `rm -rf $TMPDIR` is called.
try-job: x86_64-msvc
Inside #123865, we are adding support for the new semantics
for expr2024, but we have noted a performance issue.
We realized there is a redundant check for each
token regarding an edition. This commit moves the edition
check to the end, avoiding some extra checks that
can slow down compilation time.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123865
Co-Developed-by: @eholk
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
When implementing support for rmake.rs, I copied over the `$TMPDIR`
directory logic from the legacy Makefile setup. In doing so, I also
compiled recipe `rmake.rs` into executables which unfortunately are
placed into `$TMPDIR` as well.
This causes a problem on Windows where:
- The `rmake.exe` executable is placed in `$TMPDIR`.
- We run the `rmake.exe` as a process.
- The process uses `rmake.exe` inside `$TMPDIR`.
- Windows prevents the .exe file from being deleted when the process
is still alive.
- The recipe test code tries to `remove_dir_all($TMPDIR)`, which fails
with access denied because `rmake.exe` is still being used.
We fix this by separating the recipe executable and the sratch
directory:
```
base_dir/
rmake.exe
scratch/
```
We construct a base directory, unique to each run-make test, under
which we place rmake.exe alongside a `scratch/` directory. This
`scratch/` directory is what is passed to rmake.rs tests as `$TMPDIR`,
so now `remove_dir_all($TMPDIR)` has a chance to succeed because
it no longer contains `rmake.exe`.
Oops. This was a fun one to try figure out.
This has been verified by kani as a correct optimization
see: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110840#issuecomment-1942587398
The new implementation is branchless, and only differs in which NaN
values are produced (if any are produced at all). Which is fine to change.
Aside from NaN handling, this implementation produces bitwise identical
results to the original implementation.
The new implementation is gated on targets that have a fast 64-bit
floating point implementation in hardware, and on WASM.
Unroll first iteration of checked_ilog loop
This follows the optimization of #115913. As shown in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115913#issuecomment-2066788006, the performance was improved in all important cases, but some regressions were introduced for the benchmarks `u32_log_random_small`, `u8_log_random` and `u8_log_random_small`.
Basically, #115913 changed the implementation from one division per iteration to one multiplication per iteration plus one division. When there are zero iterations, this is a regression from zero divisions to one division.
This PR avoids this by avoiding the division if we need zero iterations by returning `Some(0)` early. It also reduces the number of multiplications by one in all other cases.
Michael Goulet