quantum-espresso/test-suite/pw_scf/benchmark.out.git.inp=scf-p...

356 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext

Program PWSCF v.6.7MaX starts on 10Dec2020 at 14:35: 8
This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite
for quantum simulation of materials; please cite
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 21 395502 (2009);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 29 465901 (2017);
URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org",
in publications or presentations arising from this work. More details at
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/quote
Parallel version (MPI & OpenMP), running on 4 processor cores
Number of MPI processes: 4
Threads/MPI process: 1
MPI processes distributed on 1 nodes
R & G space division: proc/nbgrp/npool/nimage = 4
Reading input from scf-ppcg-gamma.in
Current dimensions of program PWSCF are:
Max number of different atomic species (ntypx) = 10
Max number of k-points (npk) = 40000
Max angular momentum in pseudopotentials (lmaxx) = 3
IMPORTANT: XC functional enforced from input :
Exchange-correlation= PBE
( 1 4 3 4 0 0 0)
Any further DFT definition will be discarded
Please, verify this is what you really want
gamma-point specific algorithms are used
Subspace diagonalization in iterative solution of the eigenvalue problem:
a serial algorithm will be used
Parallelization info
--------------------
sticks: dense smooth PW G-vecs: dense smooth PW
Min 303 303 74 8057 8057 989
Max 310 310 79 8058 8058 990
Sum 1225 1225 301 32231 32231 3959
bravais-lattice index = 1
lattice parameter (alat) = 8.0000 a.u.
unit-cell volume = 512.0000 (a.u.)^3
number of atoms/cell = 10
number of atomic types = 2
number of electrons = 22.00
number of Kohn-Sham states= 11
kinetic-energy cutoff = 60.0000 Ry
charge density cutoff = 240.0000 Ry
scf convergence threshold = 1.0E-15
mixing beta = 0.7000
number of iterations used = 8 plain mixing
Exchange-correlation= PBE
( 1 4 3 4 0 0 0)
celldm(1)= 8.000000 celldm(2)= 0.000000 celldm(3)= 0.000000
celldm(4)= 0.000000 celldm(5)= 0.000000 celldm(6)= 0.000000
crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of alat)
a(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
a(2) = ( 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 )
a(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 )
reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in units 2 pi/alat)
b(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
b(2) = ( 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 )
b(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 )
PseudoPot. # 1 for H read from file:
/marconi/home/userexternal/icarnime/q-e/test-suite/..//pseudo/H.pbe-hgh.UPF
MD5 check sum: 50ae4f52d34cf16cdfed4bce9c5a191e
Pseudo is Norm-conserving, Zval = 1.0
Generated in analytical, separable form
Using radial grid of 929 points, 0 beta functions with:
PseudoPot. # 2 for C read from file:
/marconi/home/userexternal/icarnime/q-e/test-suite/..//pseudo/C.pbe-hgh.UPF
MD5 check sum: ca26ff84b356733038fc2f5c468d1892
Pseudo is Norm-conserving, Zval = 4.0
Generated in analytical, separable form
Using radial grid of 1073 points, 1 beta functions with:
l(1) = 0
atomic species valence mass pseudopotential
H 1.00 1.00783 H ( 1.00)
C 4.00 12.00000 C ( 1.00)
No symmetry found
Cartesian axes
site n. atom positions (alat units)
1 H tau( 1) = ( -0.3396188 -0.3072775 0.2952175 )
2 H tau( 2) = ( -0.3641150 0.3114112 0.1191170 )
3 H tau( 3) = ( 0.2545363 -0.3380175 -0.1311087 )
4 H tau( 4) = ( 0.3886387 -0.2037337 0.2366638 )
5 H tau( 5) = ( 0.3060188 0.3298075 0.0415838 )
6 H tau( 6) = ( 0.1176044 0.2002337 -0.3229712 )
7 C tau( 7) = ( -0.1518812 -0.1636275 0.1645763 )
8 C tau( 8) = ( -0.1701575 0.1457675 0.1031486 )
9 C tau( 9) = ( 0.1935900 -0.1791975 0.0638284 )
10 C tau( 10) = ( 0.1368550 0.1713513 -0.0621193 )
number of k points= 1
cart. coord. in units 2pi/alat
k( 1) = ( 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000), wk = 2.0000000
Dense grid: 16116 G-vectors FFT dimensions: ( 40, 40, 40)
Estimated max dynamical RAM per process > 3.38 MB
Estimated total dynamical RAM > 13.53 MB
Initial potential from superposition of free atoms
starting charge 21.99978, renormalised to 22.00000
Starting wfcs are 22 randomized atomic wfcs
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.1 secs
Self-consistent Calculation
iteration # 1 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-02, avg # of iterations = 4.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.1 secs
total energy = -52.06430818 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.96267696 Ry
iteration # 2 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 4.38E-03, avg # of iterations = 6.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.1 secs
total energy = -52.22289832 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.27863971 Ry
iteration # 3 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.27E-03, avg # of iterations = 6.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.2 secs
total energy = -52.29343175 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.01732979 Ry
iteration # 4 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 7.88E-05, avg # of iterations = 6.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.2 secs
total energy = -52.29670966 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00046169 Ry
iteration # 5 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 2.10E-06, avg # of iterations = 7.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.2 secs
total energy = -52.29678346 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00020296 Ry
iteration # 6 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 9.23E-07, avg # of iterations = 6.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.2 secs
total energy = -52.29682919 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00001062 Ry
iteration # 7 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 4.83E-08, avg # of iterations = 6.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -52.29683108 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000012 Ry
iteration # 8 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 5.28E-10, avg # of iterations = 6.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -52.29683111 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000002 Ry
iteration # 9 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 9.70E-11, avg # of iterations = 6.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.7E-09 Ry
iteration # 10 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 7.80E-12, avg # of iterations = 6.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.2E-10 Ry
iteration # 11 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 5.35E-13, avg # of iterations = 6.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.1E-11 Ry
iteration # 12 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 6.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 7.5E-13 Ry
iteration # 13 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 3.6
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 3.2E-14 Ry
iteration # 14 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 2.1
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 9.2E-15 Ry
iteration # 15 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 2.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.5 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 2.9E-15 Ry
iteration # 16 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
PPCG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 2.1
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.5 secs
End of self-consistent calculation
k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ( 1980 PWs) bands (ev):
-15.4263 -9.4763 -9.0237 -7.8876 -4.6715 -4.0302 -3.6010 -2.6181
-1.4871 -1.2174 0.3363
highest occupied level (ev): 0.3363
! total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 3.1E-16 Ry
The total energy is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = -33.70003690 Ry
hartree contribution = 24.44937160 Ry
xc contribution = -18.39143626 Ry
ewald contribution = -24.65472956 Ry
convergence has been achieved in 16 iterations
Forces acting on atoms (cartesian axes, Ry/au):
atom 1 type 1 force = 0.09577770 0.01204150 -0.03559528
atom 2 type 1 force = 0.01946019 -0.01601558 0.00084669
atom 3 type 1 force = -0.01997400 0.01984258 -0.00727383
atom 4 type 1 force = -0.07095890 0.02264336 -0.00123554
atom 5 type 1 force = -0.00815028 -0.00021289 -0.00656056
atom 6 type 1 force = -0.00278869 -0.01514424 -0.00610597
atom 7 type 2 force = -0.03318366 -0.07027613 0.11210092
atom 8 type 2 force = -0.01313368 0.08420419 0.01155466
atom 9 type 2 force = 0.01971409 -0.01801074 -0.06272594
atom 10 type 2 force = 0.01323721 -0.01907205 -0.00500515
Total force = 0.221844 Total SCF correction = 0.000000
Writing output data file ./pwscf.save/
init_run : 0.04s CPU 0.04s WALL ( 1 calls)
electrons : 0.39s CPU 0.41s WALL ( 1 calls)
forces : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 1 calls)
Called by init_run:
wfcinit : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 1 calls)
potinit : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 1 calls)
hinit0 : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 1 calls)
Called by electrons:
c_bands : 0.23s CPU 0.24s WALL ( 16 calls)
sum_band : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 16 calls)
v_of_rho : 0.12s CPU 0.12s WALL ( 17 calls)
mix_rho : 0.02s CPU 0.02s WALL ( 16 calls)
Called by c_bands:
init_us_2 : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 33 calls)
ppcg_gamma : 0.19s CPU 0.20s WALL ( 16 calls)
wfcrot : 0.04s CPU 0.04s WALL ( 16 calls)
Called by ppcg_*:
h_psi : 0.18s CPU 0.19s WALL ( 84 calls)
Called by h_psi:
h_psi:calbec : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 84 calls)
vloc_psi : 0.18s CPU 0.18s WALL ( 84 calls)
add_vuspsi : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 84 calls)
General routines
calbec : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 88 calls)
fft : 0.04s CPU 0.05s WALL ( 137 calls)
ffts : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 16 calls)
fftw : 0.18s CPU 0.18s WALL ( 1090 calls)
Parallel routines
fft_scatt_xy : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 1243 calls)
fft_scatt_yz : 0.09s CPU 0.08s WALL ( 1243 calls)
PWSCF : 0.47s CPU 0.50s WALL
This run was terminated on: 14:35: 8 10Dec2020
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
JOB DONE.
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=