quantum-espresso/test-suite/pw_scf/benchmark.out.git.inp=scf-p...

347 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext

Program PWSCF v.6.7MaX starts on 10Dec2020 at 14:35: 4
This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite
for quantum simulation of materials; please cite
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 21 395502 (2009);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 29 465901 (2017);
URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org",
in publications or presentations arising from this work. More details at
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/quote
Parallel version (MPI & OpenMP), running on 4 processor cores
Number of MPI processes: 4
Threads/MPI process: 1
MPI processes distributed on 1 nodes
R & G space division: proc/nbgrp/npool/nimage = 4
Reading input from scf-paro-gamma.in
Current dimensions of program PWSCF are:
Max number of different atomic species (ntypx) = 10
Max number of k-points (npk) = 40000
Max angular momentum in pseudopotentials (lmaxx) = 3
IMPORTANT: XC functional enforced from input :
Exchange-correlation= PBE
( 1 4 3 4 0 0 0)
Any further DFT definition will be discarded
Please, verify this is what you really want
gamma-point specific algorithms are used
Subspace diagonalization in iterative solution of the eigenvalue problem:
a serial algorithm will be used
Parallelization info
--------------------
sticks: dense smooth PW G-vecs: dense smooth PW
Min 303 303 74 8057 8057 989
Max 310 310 79 8058 8058 990
Sum 1225 1225 301 32231 32231 3959
bravais-lattice index = 1
lattice parameter (alat) = 8.0000 a.u.
unit-cell volume = 512.0000 (a.u.)^3
number of atoms/cell = 10
number of atomic types = 2
number of electrons = 22.00
number of Kohn-Sham states= 11
kinetic-energy cutoff = 60.0000 Ry
charge density cutoff = 240.0000 Ry
scf convergence threshold = 1.0E-15
mixing beta = 0.7000
number of iterations used = 8 plain mixing
Exchange-correlation= PBE
( 1 4 3 4 0 0 0)
celldm(1)= 8.000000 celldm(2)= 0.000000 celldm(3)= 0.000000
celldm(4)= 0.000000 celldm(5)= 0.000000 celldm(6)= 0.000000
crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of alat)
a(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
a(2) = ( 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 )
a(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 )
reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in units 2 pi/alat)
b(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
b(2) = ( 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 )
b(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 )
PseudoPot. # 1 for H read from file:
/marconi/home/userexternal/icarnime/q-e/test-suite/..//pseudo/H.pbe-hgh.UPF
MD5 check sum: 50ae4f52d34cf16cdfed4bce9c5a191e
Pseudo is Norm-conserving, Zval = 1.0
Generated in analytical, separable form
Using radial grid of 929 points, 0 beta functions with:
PseudoPot. # 2 for C read from file:
/marconi/home/userexternal/icarnime/q-e/test-suite/..//pseudo/C.pbe-hgh.UPF
MD5 check sum: ca26ff84b356733038fc2f5c468d1892
Pseudo is Norm-conserving, Zval = 4.0
Generated in analytical, separable form
Using radial grid of 1073 points, 1 beta functions with:
l(1) = 0
atomic species valence mass pseudopotential
H 1.00 1.00783 H ( 1.00)
C 4.00 12.00000 C ( 1.00)
No symmetry found
Cartesian axes
site n. atom positions (alat units)
1 H tau( 1) = ( -0.3396188 -0.3072775 0.2952175 )
2 H tau( 2) = ( -0.3641150 0.3114112 0.1191170 )
3 H tau( 3) = ( 0.2545363 -0.3380175 -0.1311087 )
4 H tau( 4) = ( 0.3886387 -0.2037337 0.2366638 )
5 H tau( 5) = ( 0.3060188 0.3298075 0.0415838 )
6 H tau( 6) = ( 0.1176044 0.2002337 -0.3229712 )
7 C tau( 7) = ( -0.1518812 -0.1636275 0.1645763 )
8 C tau( 8) = ( -0.1701575 0.1457675 0.1031486 )
9 C tau( 9) = ( 0.1935900 -0.1791975 0.0638284 )
10 C tau( 10) = ( 0.1368550 0.1713513 -0.0621193 )
number of k points= 1
cart. coord. in units 2pi/alat
k( 1) = ( 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000), wk = 2.0000000
Dense grid: 16116 G-vectors FFT dimensions: ( 40, 40, 40)
Estimated max dynamical RAM per process > 3.38 MB
Estimated total dynamical RAM > 13.53 MB
Initial potential from superposition of free atoms
starting charge 21.99978, renormalised to 22.00000
Starting wfcs are 22 randomized atomic wfcs
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.1 secs
Self-consistent Calculation
iteration # 1 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-02, avg # of iterations = 4.1
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.1 secs
total energy = -52.07963773 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.94029203 Ry
iteration # 2 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 4.27E-03, avg # of iterations = 5.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.1 secs
total energy = -52.22959585 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.25283527 Ry
iteration # 3 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 1.15E-03, avg # of iterations = 5.4
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.2 secs
total energy = -52.29309460 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.01789402 Ry
iteration # 4 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 8.13E-05, avg # of iterations = 5.5
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.2 secs
total energy = -52.29635781 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00162393 Ry
iteration # 5 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 7.38E-06, avg # of iterations = 5.7
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.2 secs
total energy = -52.29675444 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00041811 Ry
iteration # 6 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 1.90E-06, avg # of iterations = 5.1
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.2 secs
total energy = -52.29683039 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000283 Ry
iteration # 7 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 1.29E-08, avg # of iterations = 5.4
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -52.29683100 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000047 Ry
iteration # 8 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 2.13E-09, avg # of iterations = 5.5
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -52.29683111 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000002 Ry
iteration # 9 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 8.70E-11, avg # of iterations = 5.4
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 5.7E-10 Ry
iteration # 10 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 2.60E-12, avg # of iterations = 4.8
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 2.7E-11 Ry
iteration # 11 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 1.21E-13, avg # of iterations = 5.3
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.2E-12 Ry
iteration # 12 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 2.5
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.1E-13 Ry
iteration # 13 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 2.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 5.6E-15 Ry
iteration # 14 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 2.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.7E-15 Ry
iteration # 15 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
ParO style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 2.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
End of self-consistent calculation
k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ( 1980 PWs) bands (ev):
-15.4263 -9.4763 -9.0237 -7.8876 -4.6715 -4.0302 -3.6010 -2.6181
-1.4871 -1.2174 0.3363
highest occupied level (ev): 0.3363
! total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.8E-16 Ry
The total energy is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = -33.70003695 Ry
hartree contribution = 24.44937167 Ry
xc contribution = -18.39143627 Ry
ewald contribution = -24.65472956 Ry
convergence has been achieved in 15 iterations
Forces acting on atoms (cartesian axes, Ry/au):
atom 1 type 1 force = 0.09577773 0.01204153 -0.03559527
atom 2 type 1 force = 0.01946016 -0.01601552 0.00084671
atom 3 type 1 force = -0.01997402 0.01984261 -0.00727378
atom 4 type 1 force = -0.07095892 0.02264337 -0.00123554
atom 5 type 1 force = -0.00815026 -0.00021285 -0.00656054
atom 6 type 1 force = -0.00278867 -0.01514422 -0.00610594
atom 7 type 2 force = -0.03318361 -0.07027616 0.11210086
atom 8 type 2 force = -0.01313368 0.08420409 0.01155458
atom 9 type 2 force = 0.01971404 -0.01801080 -0.06272593
atom 10 type 2 force = 0.01323724 -0.01907206 -0.00500518
Total force = 0.221844 Total SCF correction = 0.000000
Writing output data file ./pwscf.save/
init_run : 0.03s CPU 0.04s WALL ( 1 calls)
electrons : 0.35s CPU 0.36s WALL ( 1 calls)
forces : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 1 calls)
Called by init_run:
wfcinit : 0.00s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 1 calls)
potinit : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 1 calls)
hinit0 : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 1 calls)
Called by electrons:
c_bands : 0.19s CPU 0.20s WALL ( 15 calls)
sum_band : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 15 calls)
v_of_rho : 0.11s CPU 0.12s WALL ( 16 calls)
mix_rho : 0.02s CPU 0.02s WALL ( 15 calls)
Called by c_bands:
init_us_2 : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 31 calls)
paro_gamma : 0.19s CPU 0.20s WALL ( 15 calls)
Called by paro_*:
h_psi : 0.16s CPU 0.16s WALL ( 166 calls)
g_psi : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 832 calls)
Called by h_psi:
h_psi:calbec : 0.01s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 166 calls)
vloc_psi : 0.15s CPU 0.15s WALL ( 166 calls)
add_vuspsi : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 166 calls)
General routines
calbec : 0.01s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 170 calls)
fft : 0.04s CPU 0.05s WALL ( 129 calls)
ffts : 0.01s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 15 calls)
fftw : 0.15s CPU 0.16s WALL ( 924 calls)
Parallel routines
fft_scatt_xy : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 1068 calls)
fft_scatt_yz : 0.08s CPU 0.07s WALL ( 1068 calls)
PWSCF : 0.42s CPU 0.46s WALL
This run was terminated on: 14:35: 4 10Dec2020
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
JOB DONE.
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=