quantum-espresso/test-suite/pw_scf/benchmark.out.git.inp=scf-c...

413 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext

Program PWSCF v.7.3.1 starts on 17Jul2024 at 17:31:50
Git branch: q-e-v731
Last git commit: 7fd60c9bc9fe7a7d1fe6f1049f4afba0eab9aeef-dirty
Last git commit date: Thu Feb 29 10:18:05 2024 +0000
Last git commit subject: Merge branch 'master_qe_7.3.1' into 'master'
This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite
for quantum simulation of materials; please cite
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 21 395502 (2009);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 29 465901 (2017);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Chem. Phys. 152 154105 (2020);
URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org",
in publications or presentations arising from this work. More details at
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/quote
Parallel version (MPI & OpenMP), running on 4 processor cores
Number of MPI processes: 4
Threads/MPI process: 1
MPI processes distributed on 1 nodes
4319 MiB available memory on the printing compute node when the environment starts
Reading input from scf-cg-gamma.in
Current dimensions of program PWSCF are:
Max number of different atomic species (ntypx) = 10
Max number of k-points (npk) = 40000
Max angular momentum in pseudopotentials (lmaxx) = 4
IMPORTANT: XC functional enforced from input :
Exchange-correlation= PBE
( 1 4 3 4 0 0 0)
Any further DFT definition will be discarded
Please, verify this is what you really want
gamma-point specific algorithms are used
R & G space division: proc/nbgrp/npool/nimage = 4
Subspace diagonalization in iterative solution of the eigenvalue problem:
a serial algorithm will be used
Parallelization info
--------------------
sticks: dense smooth PW G-vecs: dense smooth PW
Min 303 303 74 8057 8057 989
Max 310 310 79 8058 8058 990
Sum 1225 1225 301 32231 32231 3959
Using Slab Decomposition
bravais-lattice index = 1
lattice parameter (alat) = 8.0000 a.u.
unit-cell volume = 512.0000 (a.u.)^3
number of atoms/cell = 10
number of atomic types = 2
number of electrons = 22.00
number of Kohn-Sham states= 11
kinetic-energy cutoff = 60.0000 Ry
charge density cutoff = 240.0000 Ry
scf convergence threshold = 1.0E-15
mixing beta = 0.7000
number of iterations used = 8 plain mixing
Exchange-correlation= PBE
( 1 4 3 4 0 0 0)
celldm(1)= 8.000000 celldm(2)= 0.000000 celldm(3)= 0.000000
celldm(4)= 0.000000 celldm(5)= 0.000000 celldm(6)= 0.000000
crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of alat)
a(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
a(2) = ( 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 )
a(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 )
reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in units 2 pi/alat)
b(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
b(2) = ( 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 )
b(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 )
PseudoPot. # 1 for H read from file:
/home/ivan/pseudo/H.pbe-hgh.UPF
MD5 check sum: 50ae4f52d34cf16cdfed4bce9c5a191e
Pseudo is Norm-conserving, Zval = 1.0
Generated in analytical, separable form
Using radial grid of 929 points, 0 beta functions with:
PseudoPot. # 2 for C read from file:
/home/ivan/pseudo/C.pbe-hgh.UPF
MD5 check sum: ca26ff84b356733038fc2f5c468d1892
Pseudo is Norm-conserving, Zval = 4.0
Generated in analytical, separable form
Using radial grid of 1073 points, 1 beta functions with:
l(1) = 0
atomic species valence mass pseudopotential
H 1.00 1.00783 H ( 1.00)
C 4.00 12.00000 C ( 1.00)
No symmetry found
Cartesian axes
site n. atom positions (alat units)
1 H tau( 1) = ( -0.3396188 -0.3072775 0.2952175 )
2 H tau( 2) = ( -0.3641150 0.3114112 0.1191170 )
3 H tau( 3) = ( 0.2545363 -0.3380175 -0.1311087 )
4 H tau( 4) = ( 0.3886387 -0.2037337 0.2366638 )
5 H tau( 5) = ( 0.3060188 0.3298075 0.0415838 )
6 H tau( 6) = ( 0.1176044 0.2002337 -0.3229712 )
7 C tau( 7) = ( -0.1518812 -0.1636275 0.1645763 )
8 C tau( 8) = ( -0.1701575 0.1457675 0.1031486 )
9 C tau( 9) = ( 0.1935900 -0.1791975 0.0638284 )
10 C tau( 10) = ( 0.1368550 0.1713513 -0.0621193 )
number of k points= 1
cart. coord. in units 2pi/alat
k( 1) = ( 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000), wk = 2.0000000
Dense grid: 16116 G-vectors FFT dimensions: ( 40, 40, 40)
Estimated max dynamical RAM per process > 3.38 MB
Estimated total dynamical RAM > 13.53 MB
Initial potential from superposition of free atoms
starting charge 21.9998, renormalised to 22.0000
Starting wfcs are 22 randomized atomic wfcs
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.2 secs
per-process dynamical memory: 12.4 Mb
Self-consistent Calculation
iteration # 1 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-02, avg # of iterations = 3.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -52.08447373 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.92207104 Ry
iteration # 2 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 4.19E-03, avg # of iterations = 4.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -52.23638992 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.21218905 Ry
iteration # 3 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 9.64E-04, avg # of iterations = 3.9
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -52.29319933 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.01266323 Ry
iteration # 4 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 5.76E-05, avg # of iterations = 3.8
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -52.29674580 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00042972 Ry
iteration # 5 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.95E-06, avg # of iterations = 3.9
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29681604 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00004272 Ry
iteration # 6 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.94E-07, avg # of iterations = 4.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29682987 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000256 Ry
iteration # 7 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.16E-08, avg # of iterations = 4.3
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29683102 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000027 Ry
iteration # 8 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.25E-09, avg # of iterations = 4.2
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -52.29683111 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000002 Ry
iteration # 9 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 7.46E-11, avg # of iterations = 4.5
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.5 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 2.5E-09 Ry
iteration # 10 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.12E-11, avg # of iterations = 4.3
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.5 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.2E-09 Ry
iteration # 11 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 5.27E-12, avg # of iterations = 3.5
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.5 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 2.2E-11 Ry
iteration # 12 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 5.2
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.5 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.6E-11 Ry
iteration # 13 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 3.3
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.6 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.2E-12 Ry
iteration # 14 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 3.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.6 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 6.6E-14 Ry
iteration # 15 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 3.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.6 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 5.0E-14 Ry
iteration # 16 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 3.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.6 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 4.6E-14 Ry
iteration # 17 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 3.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.6 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 4.3E-14 Ry
iteration # 18 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 3.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.7 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 2.2E-14 Ry
iteration # 19 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 3.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.7 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 4.2E-15 Ry
iteration # 20 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 3.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.7 secs
total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 4.1E-15 Ry
iteration # 21 ecut= 60.00 Ry beta= 0.70
CG style diagonalization
ethr = 1.00E-13, avg # of iterations = 3.0
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.7 secs
End of self-consistent calculation
k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ( 1980 PWs) bands (ev):
-15.4263 -9.4763 -9.0237 -7.8876 -4.6715 -4.0302 -3.6010 -2.6181
-1.4871 -1.2174 0.3363
highest occupied level (ev): 0.3363
! total energy = -52.29683112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.3E-16 Ry
The total energy is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = -33.70003697 Ry
hartree contribution = 24.44937169 Ry
xc contribution = -18.39143628 Ry
ewald contribution = -24.65472956 Ry
convergence has been achieved in 21 iterations
Forces acting on atoms (cartesian axes, Ry/au):
atom 1 type 1 force = 0.09577773 0.01204153 -0.03559527
atom 2 type 1 force = 0.01946016 -0.01601552 0.00084672
atom 3 type 1 force = -0.01997402 0.01984261 -0.00727377
atom 4 type 1 force = -0.07095892 0.02264337 -0.00123553
atom 5 type 1 force = -0.00815026 -0.00021285 -0.00656053
atom 6 type 1 force = -0.00278867 -0.01514423 -0.00610594
atom 7 type 2 force = -0.03318361 -0.07027619 0.11210085
atom 8 type 2 force = -0.01313368 0.08420409 0.01155459
atom 9 type 2 force = 0.01971403 -0.01801077 -0.06272595
atom 10 type 2 force = 0.01323724 -0.01907203 -0.00500517
Total force = 0.221844 Total SCF correction = 0.000000
Writing all to output data dir ./pwscf.save/ :
XML data file, charge density, pseudopotentials, collected wavefunctions
init_run : 0.09s CPU 0.12s WALL ( 1 calls)
electrons : 0.45s CPU 0.47s WALL ( 1 calls)
forces : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 1 calls)
Called by init_run:
wfcinit : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 1 calls)
potinit : 0.04s CPU 0.04s WALL ( 1 calls)
hinit0 : 0.05s CPU 0.07s WALL ( 1 calls)
Called by electrons:
c_bands : 0.24s CPU 0.25s WALL ( 21 calls)
sum_band : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 21 calls)
v_of_rho : 0.17s CPU 0.17s WALL ( 22 calls)
mix_rho : 0.02s CPU 0.02s WALL ( 21 calls)
Called by c_bands:
init_us_2 : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 43 calls)
rcgdiagg : 0.21s CPU 0.22s WALL ( 21 calls)
wfcrot : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 21 calls)
Called by *cgdiagg:
h_psi : 0.18s CPU 0.19s WALL ( 635 calls)
Called by h_psi:
h_psi:calbec : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 635 calls)
vloc_psi : 0.16s CPU 0.16s WALL ( 635 calls)
add_vuspsi : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 635 calls)
hs_1psi : 0.16s CPU 0.17s WALL ( 614 calls)
s_1psi : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 614 calls)
General routines
calbec : 0.02s CPU 0.02s WALL ( 1253 calls)
fft : 0.04s CPU 0.07s WALL ( 177 calls)
ffts : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 21 calls)
fftw : 0.15s CPU 0.16s WALL ( 1616 calls)
Parallel routines
PWSCF : 0.67s CPU 0.75s WALL
This run was terminated on: 17:31:51 17Jul2024
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
JOB DONE.
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=