quantum-espresso/PW/examples/ESM_example/reference/Al001_bc3_m002.out

341 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext

Program PWSCF v.7.0rc1 starts on 1Dec2021 at 11:19: 4
Git branch: dev-rism
Last git commit: 0f89c8bb5a130116d85338b1454d7fb3d9957a45
Last git commit date: Wed Dec 1 11:03:07 2021 +0900
Last git commit subject: update Doc/release-notes
This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite
for quantum simulation of materials; please cite
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 21 395502 (2009);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 29 465901 (2017);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Chem. Phys. 152 154105 (2020);
URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org",
in publications or presentations arising from this work. More details at
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/quote
Parallel version (MPI), running on 4 processors
MPI processes distributed on 1 nodes
R & G space division: proc/nbgrp/npool/nimage = 4
0 MiB available memory on the printing compute node when the environment starts
Waiting for input...
Reading input from standard input
Current dimensions of program PWSCF are:
Max number of different atomic species (ntypx) = 10
Max number of k-points (npk) = 40000
Max angular momentum in pseudopotentials (lmaxx) = 4
Found identity + ( -0.5000 0.0000 0.0000) symmetry
This is a supercell, fractional translations are disabled
Message from routine setup:
using ibrav=0 with symmetry is DISCOURAGED, use correct ibrav instead
Subspace diagonalization in iterative solution of the eigenvalue problem:
a serial algorithm will be used
Parallelization info
--------------------
sticks: dense smooth PW G-vecs: dense smooth PW
Min 187 187 54 8037 8037 1261
Max 188 188 56 8044 8044 1262
Sum 749 749 221 32157 32157 5047
Using Slab Decomposition
bravais-lattice index = 0
lattice parameter (alat) = 10.8223 a.u.
unit-cell volume = 2655.9321 (a.u.)^3
number of atoms/cell = 4
number of atomic types = 1
number of electrons = 12.02
number of Kohn-Sham states= 10
kinetic-energy cutoff = 20.0000 Ry
charge density cutoff = 80.0000 Ry
scf convergence threshold = 1.0E-06
mixing beta = 0.3000
number of iterations used = 8 plain mixing
Exchange-correlation= SLA PW PBE PBE
( 1 4 3 4 0 0 0)
Effective Screening Medium Method
=================================
Boundary Conditions: Vacuum-Slab-Metal
total charge in unit cell = -0.0200
grid points for fit at edges = 4
celldm(1)= 10.822273 celldm(2)= 0.000000 celldm(3)= 0.000000
celldm(4)= 0.000000 celldm(5)= 0.000000 celldm(6)= 0.000000
crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of alat)
a(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
a(2) = ( 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 )
a(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 2.095374 )
reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in units 2 pi/alat)
b(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
b(2) = ( 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 )
b(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 0.477242 )
PseudoPot. # 1 for Al read from file:
/Users/otani/Program/q-e/git-worktrees/dev-rism/pseudo/Al.pbe-n-van.UPF
MD5 check sum: cbc97ad259b400557db688b98a6ada97
Pseudo is Ultrasoft + core correction, Zval = 3.0
Generated by new atomic code, or converted to UPF format
Using radial grid of 893 points, 2 beta functions with:
l(1) = 0
l(2) = 1
Q(r) pseudized with 8 coefficients, rinner = 0.900 0.900 0.900
atomic species valence mass pseudopotential
Al 3.00 26.98154 Al( 1.00)
8 Sym. Ops. (no inversion) found
Cartesian axes
site n. atom positions (alat units)
1 Al tau( 1) = ( 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 )
2 Al tau( 2) = ( 0.5000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 )
3 Al tau( 3) = ( 0.0000000 0.5000000 0.0000000 )
4 Al tau( 4) = ( 0.5000000 0.5000000 0.0000000 )
number of k points= 6 Methfessel-Paxton smearing, width (Ry)= 0.0300
cart. coord. in units 2pi/alat
k( 1) = ( 0.0833333 0.0833333 0.0000000), wk = 0.2222222
k( 2) = ( 0.0833333 0.2500000 0.0000000), wk = 0.4444444
k( 3) = ( 0.0833333 0.4166667 0.0000000), wk = 0.4444444
k( 4) = ( 0.2500000 0.2500000 0.0000000), wk = 0.2222222
k( 5) = ( 0.2500000 0.4166667 0.0000000), wk = 0.4444444
k( 6) = ( 0.4166667 0.4166667 0.0000000), wk = 0.2222222
Dense grid: 32157 G-vectors FFT dimensions: ( 32, 32, 72)
Estimated max dynamical RAM per process > 9.36 MB
Estimated total dynamical RAM > 37.46 MB
Check: negative core charge= -0.000012
Initial potential from superposition of free atoms
starting charge 11.9901, renormalised to 12.0200
negative rho (up, down): 1.689E-04 0.000E+00
Starting wfcs are 16 randomized atomic wfcs
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.5 secs
Self-consistent Calculation
iteration # 1 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.00E-02, avg # of iterations = 1.8
Threshold (ethr) on eigenvalues was too large:
Diagonalizing with lowered threshold
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.77E-04, avg # of iterations = 12.0
negative rho (up, down): 7.975E-05 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.8 secs
total energy = -49.52601265 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.06657560 Ry
iteration # 2 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 5.54E-04, avg # of iterations = 1.0
negative rho (up, down): 2.018E-06 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.9 secs
total energy = -49.51743845 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.02477148 Ry
iteration # 3 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 2.06E-04, avg # of iterations = 3.4
negative rho (up, down): 3.023E-06 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.1 secs
total energy = -49.52201985 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00162894 Ry
iteration # 4 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 1.36E-05, avg # of iterations = 3.9
negative rho (up, down): 2.412E-07 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.4 secs
total energy = -49.52162274 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00266552 Ry
iteration # 5 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.36E-05, avg # of iterations = 3.0
negative rho (up, down): 3.198E-07 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.6 secs
total energy = -49.52238536 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00137337 Ry
iteration # 6 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 1.14E-05, avg # of iterations = 2.9
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.8 secs
total energy = -49.52261077 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00022462 Ry
iteration # 7 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 1.87E-06, avg # of iterations = 3.1
total cpu time spent up to now is 2.0 secs
total energy = -49.52266035 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00001594 Ry
iteration # 8 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 1.33E-07, avg # of iterations = 2.6
total cpu time spent up to now is 2.2 secs
total energy = -49.52265548 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000730 Ry
iteration # 9 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 6.07E-08, avg # of iterations = 2.7
total cpu time spent up to now is 2.3 secs
End of self-consistent calculation
k = 0.0833 0.0833 0.0000 ( 3999 PWs) bands (ev):
-10.8975 -7.3219 -7.3219 -5.6134 -5.6134 -4.8709 -3.8359 -2.9625
-1.6704 -1.6329
k = 0.0833 0.2500 0.0000 ( 4011 PWs) bands (ev):
-10.6494 -8.4546 -7.0778 -5.3856 -4.9350 -4.6331 -4.0418 -3.4814
-2.5645 -1.4019
k = 0.0833 0.4167 0.0000 ( 4016 PWs) bands (ev):
-10.1551 -9.4197 -6.5921 -5.8723 -4.9341 -4.2781 -4.1604 -3.4612
-2.2069 -0.9435
k = 0.2500 0.2500 0.0000 ( 4007 PWs) bands (ev):
-10.4016 -8.2102 -8.2102 -6.0555 -4.3956 -3.8197 -3.8197 -2.5058
-2.3305 -2.3305
k = 0.2500 0.4167 0.0000 ( 4019 PWs) bands (ev):
-9.9080 -9.1737 -7.7238 -7.0016 -3.9237 -3.3896 -3.2254 -2.8070
-2.0072 -1.8645
k = 0.4167 0.4167 0.0000 ( 4005 PWs) bands (ev):
-9.4160 -8.6842 -8.6842 -7.9561 -3.4525 -2.7562 -2.7562 -2.0623
-1.6590 -1.5946
the Fermi energy is -3.7953 ev
! total energy = -49.52265793 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000016 Ry
smearing contrib. (-TS) = -0.00017946 Ry
internal energy E=F+TS = -49.52247847 Ry
The total energy is F=E-TS. E is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = -320.57656924 Ry
hartree contribution = 161.05011269 Ry
xc contribution = -39.22813824 Ry
ewald contribution = 149.23211632 Ry
convergence has been achieved in 9 iterations
Forces acting on atoms (cartesian axes, Ry/au):
atom 1 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00001506
atom 2 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00001637
atom 3 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00001637
atom 4 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00001553
Total force = 0.000032 Total SCF correction = 0.000077
SCF correction compared to forces is large: reduce conv_thr to get better values
Writing all to output data dir /Users/otani/Program/q-e/git-worktrees/dev-rism/tempdir/Al001_bc3_m002.save/
init_run : 0.41s CPU 0.42s WALL ( 1 calls)
electrons : 1.71s CPU 1.86s WALL ( 1 calls)
forces : 0.07s CPU 0.07s WALL ( 1 calls)
Called by init_run:
wfcinit : 0.03s CPU 0.04s WALL ( 1 calls)
potinit : 0.02s CPU 0.02s WALL ( 1 calls)
hinit0 : 0.30s CPU 0.31s WALL ( 1 calls)
Called by electrons:
c_bands : 1.27s CPU 1.37s WALL ( 10 calls)
sum_band : 0.22s CPU 0.23s WALL ( 10 calls)
v_of_rho : 0.16s CPU 0.17s WALL ( 10 calls)
newd : 0.04s CPU 0.05s WALL ( 10 calls)
mix_rho : 0.03s CPU 0.04s WALL ( 10 calls)
Called by c_bands:
init_us_2 : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 132 calls)
init_us_2:cp : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 132 calls)
crmmdiagg : 0.48s CPU 0.52s WALL ( 36 calls)
wfcrot : 0.26s CPU 0.28s WALL ( 42 calls)
Called by *rmmdiagg:
h_psi : 0.91s CPU 0.97s WALL ( 257 calls)
s_psi : 0.02s CPU 0.02s WALL ( 257 calls)
g_psi : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 107 calls)
Called by h_psi:
h_psi:calbec : 0.05s CPU 0.05s WALL ( 257 calls)
vloc_psi : 0.82s CPU 0.87s WALL ( 257 calls)
add_vuspsi : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 257 calls)
General routines
calbec : 0.06s CPU 0.07s WALL ( 341 calls)
fft : 0.18s CPU 0.19s WALL ( 122 calls)
ffts : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 10 calls)
fftw : 0.76s CPU 0.81s WALL ( 4788 calls)
Parallel routines
PWSCF : 2.23s CPU 2.42s WALL
This run was terminated on: 11:19: 6 1Dec2021
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
JOB DONE.
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=