quantum-espresso/PW/examples/ESM_example/reference/Al001_bc2_efield.out

342 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext

Program PWSCF v.7.0rc1 starts on 1Dec2021 at 11:18:57
Git branch: dev-rism
Last git commit: 0f89c8bb5a130116d85338b1454d7fb3d9957a45
Last git commit date: Wed Dec 1 11:03:07 2021 +0900
Last git commit subject: update Doc/release-notes
This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite
for quantum simulation of materials; please cite
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 21 395502 (2009);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 29 465901 (2017);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Chem. Phys. 152 154105 (2020);
URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org",
in publications or presentations arising from this work. More details at
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/quote
Parallel version (MPI), running on 4 processors
MPI processes distributed on 1 nodes
R & G space division: proc/nbgrp/npool/nimage = 4
0 MiB available memory on the printing compute node when the environment starts
Waiting for input...
Reading input from standard input
Current dimensions of program PWSCF are:
Max number of different atomic species (ntypx) = 10
Max number of k-points (npk) = 40000
Max angular momentum in pseudopotentials (lmaxx) = 4
Found identity + ( -0.5000 0.0000 0.0000) symmetry
This is a supercell, fractional translations are disabled
Message from routine setup:
using ibrav=0 with symmetry is DISCOURAGED, use correct ibrav instead
Subspace diagonalization in iterative solution of the eigenvalue problem:
a serial algorithm will be used
Parallelization info
--------------------
sticks: dense smooth PW G-vecs: dense smooth PW
Min 187 187 54 8037 8037 1261
Max 188 188 56 8044 8044 1262
Sum 749 749 221 32157 32157 5047
Using Slab Decomposition
bravais-lattice index = 0
lattice parameter (alat) = 10.8223 a.u.
unit-cell volume = 2655.9321 (a.u.)^3
number of atoms/cell = 4
number of atomic types = 1
number of electrons = 12.00
number of Kohn-Sham states= 10
kinetic-energy cutoff = 20.0000 Ry
charge density cutoff = 80.0000 Ry
scf convergence threshold = 1.0E-06
mixing beta = 0.3000
number of iterations used = 8 plain mixing
Exchange-correlation= SLA PW PBE PBE
( 1 4 3 4 0 0 0)
Effective Screening Medium Method
=================================
Boundary Conditions: Metal-Slab-Metal
total charge in unit cell = 0.0000
field strength = 0.0019 Ry/a.u.
grid points for fit at edges = 4
celldm(1)= 10.822273 celldm(2)= 0.000000 celldm(3)= 0.000000
celldm(4)= 0.000000 celldm(5)= 0.000000 celldm(6)= 0.000000
crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of alat)
a(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
a(2) = ( 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 )
a(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 2.095374 )
reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in units 2 pi/alat)
b(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
b(2) = ( 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 )
b(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 0.477242 )
PseudoPot. # 1 for Al read from file:
/Users/otani/Program/q-e/git-worktrees/dev-rism/pseudo/Al.pbe-n-van.UPF
MD5 check sum: cbc97ad259b400557db688b98a6ada97
Pseudo is Ultrasoft + core correction, Zval = 3.0
Generated by new atomic code, or converted to UPF format
Using radial grid of 893 points, 2 beta functions with:
l(1) = 0
l(2) = 1
Q(r) pseudized with 8 coefficients, rinner = 0.900 0.900 0.900
atomic species valence mass pseudopotential
Al 3.00 26.98154 Al( 1.00)
8 Sym. Ops. (no inversion) found
Cartesian axes
site n. atom positions (alat units)
1 Al tau( 1) = ( 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 )
2 Al tau( 2) = ( 0.5000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 )
3 Al tau( 3) = ( 0.0000000 0.5000000 0.0000000 )
4 Al tau( 4) = ( 0.5000000 0.5000000 0.0000000 )
number of k points= 6 Methfessel-Paxton smearing, width (Ry)= 0.0300
cart. coord. in units 2pi/alat
k( 1) = ( 0.0833333 0.0833333 0.0000000), wk = 0.2222222
k( 2) = ( 0.0833333 0.2500000 0.0000000), wk = 0.4444444
k( 3) = ( 0.0833333 0.4166667 0.0000000), wk = 0.4444444
k( 4) = ( 0.2500000 0.2500000 0.0000000), wk = 0.2222222
k( 5) = ( 0.2500000 0.4166667 0.0000000), wk = 0.4444444
k( 6) = ( 0.4166667 0.4166667 0.0000000), wk = 0.2222222
Dense grid: 32157 G-vectors FFT dimensions: ( 32, 32, 72)
Estimated max dynamical RAM per process > 9.36 MB
Estimated total dynamical RAM > 37.46 MB
Check: negative core charge= -0.000012
Initial potential from superposition of free atoms
starting charge 11.9901, renormalised to 12.0000
negative rho (up, down): 1.687E-04 0.000E+00
Starting wfcs are 16 randomized atomic wfcs
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.5 secs
Self-consistent Calculation
iteration # 1 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.00E-02, avg # of iterations = 2.0
Threshold (ethr) on eigenvalues was too large:
Diagonalizing with lowered threshold
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 3.04E-04, avg # of iterations = 5.8
negative rho (up, down): 9.340E-05 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.9 secs
total energy = -49.52162112 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.07332114 Ry
iteration # 2 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 6.11E-04, avg # of iterations = 1.0
negative rho (up, down): 6.423E-06 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.0 secs
total energy = -49.51254669 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.02599733 Ry
iteration # 3 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 2.17E-04, avg # of iterations = 3.0
negative rho (up, down): 5.352E-06 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.2 secs
total energy = -49.51639752 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00163348 Ry
iteration # 4 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 1.36E-05, avg # of iterations = 3.5
negative rho (up, down): 6.521E-07 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.4 secs
total energy = -49.51662819 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00084638 Ry
iteration # 5 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 7.05E-06, avg # of iterations = 2.0
negative rho (up, down): 1.819E-07 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.6 secs
total energy = -49.51676362 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00021201 Ry
iteration # 6 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 1.77E-06, avg # of iterations = 2.9
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.8 secs
total energy = -49.51680117 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00004820 Ry
iteration # 7 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 4.02E-07, avg # of iterations = 2.8
total cpu time spent up to now is 2.0 secs
total energy = -49.51680943 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000448 Ry
iteration # 8 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 3.73E-08, avg # of iterations = 3.1
total cpu time spent up to now is 2.2 secs
total energy = -49.51680948 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000218 Ry
iteration # 9 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.30
RMM-DIIS diagonalization
ethr = 1.81E-08, avg # of iterations = 2.7
total cpu time spent up to now is 2.4 secs
End of self-consistent calculation
k = 0.0833 0.0833 0.0000 ( 3999 PWs) bands (ev):
-11.0555 -7.4800 -7.4800 -5.7715 -5.7715 -5.0159 -3.9942 -3.1213
-1.8281 -1.7804
k = 0.0833 0.2500 0.0000 ( 4011 PWs) bands (ev):
-10.8074 -8.6126 -7.2358 -5.5438 -5.0932 -4.7783 -4.2000 -3.6399
-2.7108 -1.5496
k = 0.0833 0.4167 0.0000 ( 4016 PWs) bands (ev):
-10.3131 -9.5777 -6.7501 -6.0304 -5.0923 -4.4364 -4.3058 -3.6068
-2.3652 -1.0914
k = 0.2500 0.2500 0.0000 ( 4007 PWs) bands (ev):
-10.5596 -8.3682 -8.3682 -6.2136 -4.5409 -3.9780 -3.9780 -2.6646
-2.4768 -2.4768
k = 0.2500 0.4167 0.0000 ( 4019 PWs) bands (ev):
-10.0660 -9.3317 -7.8818 -7.1597 -4.0691 -3.5479 -3.3712 -2.9654
-2.1655 -2.0111
k = 0.4167 0.4167 0.0000 ( 4005 PWs) bands (ev):
-9.5740 -8.8422 -8.8422 -8.1142 -3.5981 -2.9021 -2.9021 -2.2086
-1.8175 -1.7535
the Fermi energy is -3.9547 ev
! total energy = -49.51680989 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000002 Ry
smearing contrib. (-TS) = -0.00022589 Ry
internal energy E=F+TS = -49.51658399 Ry
The total energy is F=E-TS. E is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = -144.73322135 Ry
hartree contribution = 73.05694971 Ry
xc contribution = -39.22080606 Ry
ewald contribution = 61.38049370 Ry
convergence has been achieved in 9 iterations
Forces acting on atoms (cartesian axes, Ry/au):
atom 1 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000219
atom 2 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000210
atom 3 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000210
atom 4 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000211
Total force = 0.000004 Total SCF correction = 0.000096
SCF correction compared to forces is large: reduce conv_thr to get better values
Writing all to output data dir /Users/otani/Program/q-e/git-worktrees/dev-rism/tempdir/Al001_bc2_efield.save/
init_run : 0.47s CPU 0.49s WALL ( 1 calls)
electrons : 1.68s CPU 1.84s WALL ( 1 calls)
forces : 0.10s CPU 0.11s WALL ( 1 calls)
Called by init_run:
wfcinit : 0.05s CPU 0.06s WALL ( 1 calls)
potinit : 0.03s CPU 0.04s WALL ( 1 calls)
hinit0 : 0.33s CPU 0.34s WALL ( 1 calls)
Called by electrons:
c_bands : 1.18s CPU 1.27s WALL ( 10 calls)
sum_band : 0.27s CPU 0.30s WALL ( 10 calls)
v_of_rho : 0.17s CPU 0.18s WALL ( 10 calls)
newd : 0.04s CPU 0.05s WALL ( 10 calls)
mix_rho : 0.03s CPU 0.04s WALL ( 10 calls)
Called by c_bands:
init_us_2 : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 132 calls)
init_us_2:cp : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 132 calls)
crmmdiagg : 0.42s CPU 0.46s WALL ( 36 calls)
wfcrot : 0.29s CPU 0.31s WALL ( 42 calls)
Called by *rmmdiagg:
h_psi : 0.88s CPU 0.93s WALL ( 214 calls)
s_psi : 0.02s CPU 0.02s WALL ( 214 calls)
g_psi : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 65 calls)
Called by h_psi:
h_psi:calbec : 0.06s CPU 0.06s WALL ( 214 calls)
vloc_psi : 0.78s CPU 0.82s WALL ( 214 calls)
add_vuspsi : 0.03s CPU 0.03s WALL ( 214 calls)
General routines
calbec : 0.08s CPU 0.09s WALL ( 298 calls)
fft : 0.20s CPU 0.21s WALL ( 122 calls)
ffts : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 10 calls)
fftw : 0.75s CPU 0.79s WALL ( 4040 calls)
Parallel routines
PWSCF : 2.29s CPU 2.53s WALL
This run was terminated on: 11:18:59 1Dec2021
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
JOB DONE.
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=