quantum-espresso/test-suite/pw_pawatom/benchmark.out.git.inp=paw-v...

896 lines
32 KiB
Plaintext

Program PWSCF v.6.7GPU starts on 2Feb2021 at 13:34:51
This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite
for quantum simulation of materials; please cite
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 21 395502 (2009);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 29 465901 (2017);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Chem. Phys. 152 154105 (2020);
URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org",
in publications or presentations arising from this work. More details at
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/quote
Parallel version (MPI), running on 4 processors
MPI processes distributed on 1 nodes
R & G space division: proc/nbgrp/npool/nimage = 4
Reading input from paw-vcbfgs.in
Current dimensions of program PWSCF are:
Max number of different atomic species (ntypx) = 10
Max number of k-points (npk) = 40000
Max angular momentum in pseudopotentials (lmaxx) = 3
file Ge.pbe-kjpaw.UPF: wavefunction(s) 4S renormalized
Message from routine setup:
using ibrav=0 with symmetry is DISCOURAGED, use correct ibrav instead
Subspace diagonalization in iterative solution of the eigenvalue problem:
one sub-group per band group will be used
scalapack distributed-memory algorithm (size of sub-group: 2* 2 procs)
Parallelization info
--------------------
sticks: dense smooth PW G-vecs: dense smooth PW
Min 78 78 27 958 958 186
Max 79 79 28 963 963 189
Sum 313 313 109 3839 3839 749
Using Slab Decomposition
bravais-lattice index = 0
lattice parameter (alat) = 7.7324 a.u.
unit-cell volume = 326.9062 (a.u.)^3
number of atoms/cell = 2
number of atomic types = 1
number of electrons = 8.00
number of Kohn-Sham states= 8
kinetic-energy cutoff = 20.0000 Ry
charge density cutoff = 80.0000 Ry
scf convergence threshold = 1.0E-06
mixing beta = 0.7000
number of iterations used = 8 plain mixing
energy convergence thresh.= 1.0E-04
force convergence thresh. = 1.0E-03
press convergence thresh. = 5.0E-01
Exchange-correlation= SLA PW PBX PBC
( 1 4 3 4 0 0 0)
nstep = 50
celldm(1)= 7.732372 celldm(2)= 0.000000 celldm(3)= 0.000000
celldm(4)= 0.000000 celldm(5)= 0.000000 celldm(6)= 0.000000
crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of alat)
a(1) = ( 0.000000 0.707107 0.707107 )
a(2) = ( 0.707107 0.000000 0.707107 )
a(3) = ( 0.707107 0.707107 0.000000 )
reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in units 2 pi/alat)
b(1) = ( -0.707107 0.707107 0.707107 )
b(2) = ( 0.707107 -0.707107 0.707107 )
b(3) = ( 0.707107 0.707107 -0.707107 )
PseudoPot. # 1 for Ge read from file:
/home/giannozz/q-e-dev/test-suite/..//pseudo/Ge.pbe-kjpaw.UPF
MD5 check sum: fa6acec385508fbd41db1ad5f2fba766
Pseudo is Projector augmented-wave + core cor, Zval = 4.0
Generated using "atomic" code by A. Dal Corso (espresso distribution)
Shape of augmentation charge: BESSEL
Using radial grid of 1207 points, 4 beta functions with:
l(1) = 0
l(2) = 0
l(3) = 1
l(4) = 1
Q(r) pseudized with 0 coefficients
atomic species valence mass pseudopotential
Ge 4.00 72.61000 Ge( 1.00)
48 Sym. Ops., with inversion, found (24 have fractional translation)
Cartesian axes
site n. atom positions (alat units)
1 Ge tau( 1) = ( 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 )
2 Ge tau( 2) = ( 0.3535534 0.3535534 0.3535534 )
number of k points= 10 Methfessel-Paxton smearing, width (Ry)= 0.0100
cart. coord. in units 2pi/alat
k( 1) = ( 0.0883883 0.0883883 0.0883883), wk = 0.0625000
k( 2) = ( 0.2651650 0.2651650 -0.0883883), wk = 0.1875000
k( 3) = ( -0.2651650 -0.2651650 0.4419417), wk = 0.1875000
k( 4) = ( -0.0883883 -0.0883883 0.2651650), wk = 0.1875000
k( 5) = ( 0.4419417 0.0883883 0.0883883), wk = 0.1875000
k( 6) = ( -0.0883883 -0.4419417 0.6187184), wk = 0.3750000
k( 7) = ( 0.0883883 -0.2651650 0.4419417), wk = 0.3750000
k( 8) = ( -0.6187184 0.0883883 0.0883883), wk = 0.1875000
k( 9) = ( 0.2651650 0.2651650 0.2651650), wk = 0.0625000
k( 10) = ( -0.2651650 -0.2651650 0.7954951), wk = 0.1875000
Dense grid: 3839 G-vectors FFT dimensions: ( 24, 24, 24)
Estimated max dynamical RAM per process > 1.97 MB
Estimated total dynamical RAM > 7.90 MB
Check: negative core charge= -0.000010
Initial potential from superposition of free atoms
starting charge 7.99847, renormalised to 8.00000
negative rho (up, down): 2.125E-02 0.000E+00
Starting wfcs are 8 randomized atomic wfcs
Checking if some PAW data can be deallocated...
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.2 secs
Self-consistent Calculation
iteration # 1 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.00E-02, avg # of iterations = 3.0
Threshold (ethr) on eigenvalues was too large:
Diagonalizing with lowered threshold
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 3.91E-04, avg # of iterations = 1.7
negative rho (up, down): 3.974E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -328.23169265 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.03040277 Ry
iteration # 2 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 3.80E-04, avg # of iterations = 1.0
negative rho (up, down): 4.645E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.3 secs
total energy = -328.23223172 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00181558 Ry
iteration # 3 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 2.27E-05, avg # of iterations = 2.3
negative rho (up, down): 4.589E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
total energy = -328.23230805 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00001179 Ry
iteration # 4 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.47E-07, avg # of iterations = 3.0
negative rho (up, down): 4.521E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.4 secs
End of self-consistent calculation
k = 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 ( 513 PWs) bands (ev):
-6.8760 2.7544 4.9217 4.9217 6.0128 8.2134 8.2134 8.5861
k = 0.2652 0.2652-0.0884 ( 501 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.9802 -0.2089 2.8446 4.3687 6.6696 8.9759 9.1528 10.7859
k =-0.2652-0.2652 0.4419 ( 492 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.0470 -2.0029 2.7177 3.6026 6.4779 8.7826 9.6779 12.3244
k =-0.0884-0.0884 0.2652 ( 498 PWs) bands (ev):
-6.4112 1.0181 3.8038 3.9043 7.0579 7.6966 9.7153 10.0133
k = 0.4419 0.0884 0.0884 ( 490 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.5027 -0.7995 2.5794 3.0190 6.5573 7.8590 10.8645 11.5352
k =-0.0884-0.4419 0.6187 ( 494 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.1069 -2.6349 1.3969 2.3771 7.5096 9.3292 10.2825 12.0933
k = 0.0884-0.2652 0.4419 ( 494 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.1634 -1.4671 1.9261 3.2885 7.5391 8.6177 10.1163 11.2506
k =-0.6187 0.0884 0.0884 ( 486 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.2032 -2.5743 1.9320 2.5452 6.2056 7.2029 12.8220 13.2753
k = 0.2652 0.2652 0.2652 ( 492 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.6241 -1.2491 4.0529 4.0529 5.3613 9.0090 9.0090 12.4687
k =-0.2652-0.2652 0.7955 ( 495 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.6002 -2.1911 1.3711 3.3005 6.8250 10.0931 10.8041 11.8081
the Fermi energy is 5.1646 ev
! total energy = -328.23231709 Ry
total all-electron energy = -8395.997076 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000070 Ry
smearing contrib. (-TS) = 0.00007382 Ry
internal energy E=F+TS = -328.23239092 Ry
The total energy is F=E-TS. E is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = 4.98557884 Ry
hartree contribution = 1.21065910 Ry
xc contribution = -32.27010140 Ry
ewald contribution = -15.76351078 Ry
one-center paw contrib. = -286.39501668 Ry
convergence has been achieved in 4 iterations
negative rho (up, down): 4.521E-02 0.000E+00
Forces acting on atoms (cartesian axes, Ry/au):
atom 1 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
atom 2 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 -0.00000000
Total force = 0.000000 Total SCF correction = 0.000000
Computing stress (Cartesian axis) and pressure
negative rho (up, down): 4.521E-02 0.000E+00
total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar) P= -0.96
-0.00000653 0.00000000 -0.00000000 -0.96 0.00 -0.00
0.00000000 -0.00000653 0.00000000 0.00 -0.96 0.00
-0.00000000 -0.00000000 -0.00000653 -0.00 -0.00 -0.96
BFGS Geometry Optimization
Energy error = 0.0E+00
Gradient error = 9.4E-33
Cell gradient error = 6.5E-06
number of scf cycles = 1
number of bfgs steps = 0
enthalpy new = -328.2323170945 Ry
new trust radius = 0.0005907447 bohr
new conv_thr = 0.0000010000 Ry
new unit-cell volume = 326.74603 a.u.^3 ( 48.41877 Ang^3 )
density = 4.98037 g/cm^3
CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom)
-0.000000000 2.892863270 2.892863270
2.892863270 0.000000000 2.892863270
2.892863270 2.892863270 -0.000000000
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
Ge 0.0000000000 0.0000000000 0.0000000000
Ge 0.2500000000 0.2500000000 0.2500000000
Writing output data file ./pwscf.save/
NEW-OLD atomic charge density approx. for the potential
Check: negative core charge= -0.000010
negative rho (up, down): 4.520E-02 0.000E+00
extrapolated charge 7.99608, renormalised to 8.00000
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.6 secs
Self-consistent Calculation
iteration # 1 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.00E-06, avg # of iterations = 2.0
Threshold (ethr) on eigenvalues was too large:
Diagonalizing with lowered threshold
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.36E-10, avg # of iterations = 2.0
negative rho (up, down): 4.523E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.6 secs
End of self-consistent calculation
k = 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 ( 513 PWs) bands (ev):
-6.8732 2.7615 4.9275 4.9275 6.0211 8.2202 8.2202 8.5941
k = 0.2652 0.2652-0.0884 ( 501 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.9771 -0.2035 2.8497 4.3742 6.6778 8.9830 9.1606 10.7950
k =-0.2652-0.2652 0.4420 ( 492 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.0433 -1.9984 2.7230 3.6077 6.4859 8.7899 9.6852 12.3338
k =-0.0884-0.0884 0.2652 ( 498 PWs) bands (ev):
-6.4082 1.0243 3.8093 3.9096 7.0657 7.7043 9.7229 10.0214
k = 0.4420 0.0884 0.0884 ( 490 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.4993 -0.7940 2.5842 3.0239 6.5643 7.8669 10.8731 11.5436
k =-0.0884-0.4420 0.6188 ( 494 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.1029 -2.6303 1.4012 2.3818 7.5171 9.3375 10.2908 12.1025
k = 0.0884-0.2652 0.4420 ( 494 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.1599 -1.4620 1.9308 3.2935 7.5471 8.6253 10.1244 11.2590
k =-0.6188 0.0884 0.0884 ( 486 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.1992 -2.5696 1.9365 2.5498 6.2126 7.2103 12.8318 13.2846
k = 0.2652 0.2652 0.2652 ( 492 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.6208 -1.2443 4.0582 4.0582 5.3695 9.0160 9.0160 12.4786
k =-0.2652-0.2652 0.7956 ( 495 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.5964 -2.1864 1.3756 3.3055 6.8325 10.1019 10.8119 11.8174
the Fermi energy is 5.1712 ev
! total energy = -328.23231811 Ry
total all-electron energy = -8395.997077 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000001 Ry
smearing contrib. (-TS) = 0.00007282 Ry
internal energy E=F+TS = -328.23239093 Ry
The total energy is F=E-TS. E is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = 4.98917182 Ry
hartree contribution = 1.21041086 Ry
xc contribution = -32.27069850 Ry
ewald contribution = -15.76608640 Ry
one-center paw contrib. = -286.39518870 Ry
convergence has been achieved in 1 iterations
negative rho (up, down): 4.523E-02 0.000E+00
Forces acting on atoms (cartesian axes, Ry/au):
atom 1 type 1 force = -0.00000000 -0.00000000 0.00000000
atom 2 type 1 force = -0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
Total force = 0.000000 Total SCF correction = 0.000000
Computing stress (Cartesian axis) and pressure
negative rho (up, down): 4.523E-02 0.000E+00
total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar) P= -0.57
-0.00000384 0.00000000 -0.00000000 -0.57 0.00 -0.00
0.00000000 -0.00000384 -0.00000000 0.00 -0.57 -0.00
-0.00000000 -0.00000000 -0.00000384 -0.00 -0.00 -0.57
Energy error = 1.0E-06
Gradient error = 2.9E-32
Cell gradient error = 3.8E-06
number of scf cycles = 2
number of bfgs steps = 1
enthalpy old = -328.2323170945 Ry
enthalpy new = -328.2323181074 Ry
CASE: enthalpy _new < enthalpy _old
new trust radius = 0.0008426214 bohr
new conv_thr = 0.0000000100 Ry
new unit-cell volume = 326.51761 a.u.^3 ( 48.38492 Ang^3 )
density = 4.98386 g/cm^3
CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom)
0.000000000 2.892189013 2.892189013
2.892189013 0.000000000 2.892189013
2.892189013 2.892189013 -0.000000000
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
Ge 0.0000000000 0.0000000000 -0.0000000000
Ge 0.2500000000 0.2500000000 0.2500000000
Writing output data file ./pwscf.save/
NEW-OLD atomic charge density approx. for the potential
Check: negative core charge= -0.000010
negative rho (up, down): 4.522E-02 0.000E+00
extrapolated charge 7.99440, renormalised to 8.00000
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.7 secs
Self-consistent Calculation
iteration # 1 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.00E-06, avg # of iterations = 2.0
Threshold (ethr) on eigenvalues was too large:
Diagonalizing with lowered threshold
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.30E-10, avg # of iterations = 2.0
negative rho (up, down): 4.526E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.8 secs
total energy = -328.23231897 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000001 Ry
iteration # 2 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.31E-10, avg # of iterations = 3.0
negative rho (up, down): 4.526E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.9 secs
total energy = -328.23231926 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000017 Ry
iteration # 3 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.31E-10, avg # of iterations = 1.0
negative rho (up, down): 4.528E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.9 secs
total energy = -328.23231920 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000012 Ry
iteration # 4 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.31E-10, avg # of iterations = 2.0
negative rho (up, down): 4.527E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 0.9 secs
End of self-consistent calculation
k = 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 ( 513 PWs) bands (ev):
-6.8711 2.7703 4.9343 4.9343 6.0310 8.2273 8.2273 8.6026
k = 0.2653 0.2653-0.0884 ( 501 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.9742 -0.1971 2.8545 4.3806 6.6869 8.9903 9.1680 10.8040
k =-0.2653-0.2653 0.4421 ( 492 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.0395 -1.9940 2.7281 3.6133 6.4944 8.7963 9.6923 12.3423
k =-0.0884-0.0884 0.2653 ( 498 PWs) bands (ev):
-6.4057 1.0319 3.8152 3.9152 7.0739 7.7127 9.7313 10.0297
k = 0.4421 0.0884 0.0884 ( 490 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.4961 -0.7872 2.5886 3.0288 6.5699 7.8745 10.8817 11.5531
k =-0.0884-0.4421 0.6190 ( 494 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.0984 -2.6249 1.4042 2.3858 7.5238 9.3460 10.2981 12.1125
k = 0.0884-0.2653 0.4421 ( 494 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.1563 -1.4562 1.9347 3.2987 7.5558 8.6324 10.1315 11.2680
k =-0.6190 0.0884 0.0884 ( 486 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.1950 -2.5641 1.9402 2.5544 6.2176 7.2162 12.8429 13.2957
k = 0.2653 0.2653 0.2653 ( 492 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.6176 -1.2394 4.0643 4.0643 5.3780 9.0227 9.0227 12.4867
k =-0.2653-0.2653 0.7958 ( 495 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.5922 -2.1812 1.3788 3.3107 6.8391 10.1109 10.8204 11.8273
the Fermi energy is 5.1787 ev
! total energy = -328.23231921 Ry
total all-electron energy = -8395.997078 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 3.6E-09 Ry
smearing contrib. (-TS) = 0.00007211 Ry
internal energy E=F+TS = -328.23239132 Ry
The total energy is F=E-TS. E is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = 4.99442721 Ry
hartree contribution = 1.20924466 Ry
xc contribution = -32.27101523 Ry
ewald contribution = -15.76976196 Ry
one-center paw contrib. = -286.39528601 Ry
convergence has been achieved in 4 iterations
negative rho (up, down): 4.527E-02 0.000E+00
Forces acting on atoms (cartesian axes, Ry/au):
atom 1 type 1 force = 0.00000000 -0.00000000 -0.00000000
atom 2 type 1 force = 0.00000000 -0.00000000 -0.00000000
Total force = 0.000000 Total SCF correction = 0.000000
Computing stress (Cartesian axis) and pressure
negative rho (up, down): 4.527E-02 0.000E+00
total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar) P= -0.41
-0.00000278 -0.00000000 0.00000000 -0.41 -0.00 0.00
-0.00000000 -0.00000278 0.00000000 -0.00 -0.41 0.00
0.00000000 0.00000000 -0.00000278 0.00 0.00 -0.41
Energy error = 1.1E-06
Gradient error = 4.2E-31
Cell gradient error = 2.8E-06
bfgs converged in 3 scf cycles and 2 bfgs steps
(criteria: energy < 1.0E-04 Ry, force < 1.0E-03Ry/Bohr, cell < 5.0E-01kbar)
End of BFGS Geometry Optimization
Final enthalpy = -328.2323192109 Ry
File ./pwscf.bfgs deleted, as requested
Begin final coordinates
new unit-cell volume = 326.51761 a.u.^3 ( 48.38492 Ang^3 )
density = 4.98386 g/cm^3
CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom)
0.000000000 2.892189013 2.892189013
2.892189013 0.000000000 2.892189013
2.892189013 2.892189013 -0.000000000
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
Ge 0.0000000000 0.0000000000 -0.0000000000
Ge 0.2500000000 0.2500000000 0.2500000000
End final coordinates
Writing output data file ./pwscf.save/
Final scf calculation at the relaxed structure.
The G-vectors are recalculated for the final unit cell
Results may differ from those at the preceding step.
Parallelization info
--------------------
sticks: dense smooth PW G-vecs: dense smooth PW
Min 78 78 27 958 958 186
Max 79 79 28 963 963 189
Sum 313 313 109 3839 3839 749
Using Slab Decomposition
bravais-lattice index = 0
lattice parameter (alat) = 7.7324 a.u.
unit-cell volume = 326.5176 (a.u.)^3
number of atoms/cell = 2
number of atomic types = 1
number of electrons = 8.00
number of Kohn-Sham states= 8
kinetic-energy cutoff = 20.0000 Ry
charge density cutoff = 80.0000 Ry
scf convergence threshold = 1.0E-08
mixing beta = 0.7000
number of iterations used = 8 plain mixing
press convergence thresh. = 5.0E-01
Exchange-correlation= SLA PW PBX PBC
( 1 4 3 4 0 0 0)
celldm(1)= 7.732372 celldm(2)= 0.000000 celldm(3)= 0.000000
celldm(4)= 0.000000 celldm(5)= 0.000000 celldm(6)= 0.000000
crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of alat)
a(1) = ( 0.000000 0.706826 0.706826 )
a(2) = ( 0.706826 0.000000 0.706826 )
a(3) = ( 0.706826 0.706826 -0.000000 )
reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in units 2 pi/alat)
b(1) = ( -0.707387 0.707387 0.707387 )
b(2) = ( 0.707387 -0.707387 0.707387 )
b(3) = ( 0.707387 0.707387 -0.707387 )
PseudoPot. # 1 for Ge read from file:
/home/giannozz/q-e-dev/test-suite/..//pseudo/Ge.pbe-kjpaw.UPF
MD5 check sum: fa6acec385508fbd41db1ad5f2fba766
Pseudo is Projector augmented-wave + core cor, Zval = 4.0
Generated using "atomic" code by A. Dal Corso (espresso distribution)
Shape of augmentation charge: BESSEL
Using radial grid of 1207 points, 4 beta functions with:
l(1) = 0
l(2) = 0
l(3) = 1
l(4) = 1
Q(r) pseudized with 0 coefficients
atomic species valence mass pseudopotential
Ge 4.00 72.61000 Ge( 1.00)
48 Sym. Ops., with inversion, found (24 have fractional translation)
Cartesian axes
site n. atom positions (alat units)
1 Ge tau( 1) = ( -0.0000000 -0.0000000 0.0000000 )
2 Ge tau( 2) = ( 0.3534132 0.3534132 0.3534132 )
number of k points= 10 Methfessel-Paxton smearing, width (Ry)= 0.0100
cart. coord. in units 2pi/alat
k( 1) = ( 0.0884234 0.0884234 0.0884234), wk = 0.0625000
k( 2) = ( 0.2652702 0.2652702 -0.0884234), wk = 0.1875000
k( 3) = ( -0.2652702 -0.2652702 0.4421170), wk = 0.1875000
k( 4) = ( -0.0884234 -0.0884234 0.2652702), wk = 0.1875000
k( 5) = ( 0.4421170 0.0884234 0.0884234), wk = 0.1875000
k( 6) = ( -0.0884234 -0.4421170 0.6189638), wk = 0.3750000
k( 7) = ( 0.0884234 -0.2652702 0.4421170), wk = 0.3750000
k( 8) = ( -0.6189638 0.0884234 0.0884234), wk = 0.1875000
k( 9) = ( 0.2652702 0.2652702 0.2652702), wk = 0.0625000
k( 10) = ( -0.2652702 -0.2652702 0.7958106), wk = 0.1875000
Dense grid: 3839 G-vectors FFT dimensions: ( 24, 24, 24)
Estimated max dynamical RAM per process > 1.98 MB
Estimated total dynamical RAM > 7.93 MB
Check: negative core charge= -0.000010
Initial potential from superposition of free atoms
starting charge 7.99847, renormalised to 8.00000
negative rho (up, down): 2.124E-02 0.000E+00
Starting wfcs are 8 randomized atomic wfcs
Checking if some PAW data can be deallocated...
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.1 secs
Self-consistent Calculation
iteration # 1 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.00E-06, avg # of iterations = 9.1
negative rho (up, down): 3.898E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.2 secs
total energy = -328.23166521 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.03097471 Ry
iteration # 2 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 3.87E-04, avg # of iterations = 1.0
negative rho (up, down): 4.577E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.2 secs
total energy = -328.23221942 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00172699 Ry
iteration # 3 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 2.16E-05, avg # of iterations = 1.0
negative rho (up, down): 4.579E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.3 secs
total energy = -328.23227260 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00001365 Ry
iteration # 4 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.71E-07, avg # of iterations = 2.3
negative rho (up, down): 4.529E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.3 secs
total energy = -328.23227814 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000044 Ry
iteration # 5 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 5.50E-09, avg # of iterations = 2.0
negative rho (up, down): 4.522E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.4 secs
total energy = -328.23227821 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000004 Ry
iteration # 6 ecut= 20.00 Ry beta= 0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 4.68E-10, avg # of iterations = 2.0
negative rho (up, down): 4.523E-02 0.000E+00
total cpu time spent up to now is 1.4 secs
End of self-consistent calculation
k = 0.0884 0.0884 0.0884 ( 513 PWs) bands (ev):
-6.8710 2.7704 4.9344 4.9344 6.0311 8.2274 8.2274 8.6027
k = 0.2653 0.2653-0.0884 ( 497 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.9741 -0.1967 2.8546 4.3809 6.6871 8.9905 9.1702 10.8045
k =-0.2653-0.2653 0.4421 ( 492 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.0394 -1.9939 2.7282 3.6133 6.4945 8.7964 9.6923 12.3423
k =-0.0884-0.0884 0.2653 ( 498 PWs) bands (ev):
-6.4057 1.0321 3.8152 3.9153 7.0740 7.7128 9.7314 10.0297
k = 0.4421 0.0884 0.0884 ( 490 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.4960 -0.7871 2.5886 3.0288 6.5699 7.8745 10.8817 11.5532
k =-0.0884-0.4421 0.6190 ( 494 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.0983 -2.6248 1.4043 2.3859 7.5238 9.3461 10.2981 12.1126
k = 0.0884-0.2653 0.4421 ( 490 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.1561 -1.4560 1.9350 3.2988 7.5561 8.6329 10.1318 11.2687
k =-0.6190 0.0884 0.0884 ( 482 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.1948 -2.5639 1.9403 2.5545 6.2177 7.2186 12.8435 13.2969
k = 0.2653 0.2653 0.2653 ( 492 PWs) bands (ev):
-5.6175 -1.2393 4.0644 4.0644 5.3781 9.0228 9.0228 12.4867
k =-0.2653-0.2653 0.7958 ( 487 PWs) bands (ev):
-4.5920 -2.1807 1.3790 3.3111 6.8406 10.1130 10.8230 11.8296
the Fermi energy is 5.1787 ev
! total energy = -328.23227822 Ry
total all-electron energy = -8395.997037 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 4.0E-10 Ry
smearing contrib. (-TS) = 0.00007212 Ry
internal energy E=F+TS = -328.23235034 Ry
The total energy is F=E-TS. E is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = 4.99454085 Ry
hartree contribution = 1.20919194 Ry
xc contribution = -32.27103603 Ry
ewald contribution = -15.76976196 Ry
one-center paw contrib. = -286.39528515 Ry
convergence has been achieved in 6 iterations
negative rho (up, down): 4.523E-02 0.000E+00
Forces acting on atoms (cartesian axes, Ry/au):
atom 1 type 1 force = 0.00000000 -0.00000000 -0.00000000
atom 2 type 1 force = -0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
Total force = 0.000000 Total SCF correction = 0.000000
Computing stress (Cartesian axis) and pressure
negative rho (up, down): 4.523E-02 0.000E+00
total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar) P= -0.37
-0.00000253 -0.00000000 0.00000000 -0.37 -0.00 0.00
0.00000000 -0.00000253 -0.00000000 0.00 -0.37 -0.00
-0.00000000 -0.00000000 -0.00000253 -0.00 -0.00 -0.37
Writing output data file ./pwscf.save/
init_run : 0.16s CPU 0.19s WALL ( 2 calls)
electrons : 0.80s CPU 0.85s WALL ( 4 calls)
update_pot : 0.07s CPU 0.08s WALL ( 2 calls)
forces : 0.06s CPU 0.06s WALL ( 4 calls)
stress : 0.12s CPU 0.12s WALL ( 4 calls)
Called by init_run:
wfcinit : 0.01s CPU 0.02s WALL ( 2 calls)
potinit : 0.04s CPU 0.05s WALL ( 2 calls)
hinit0 : 0.09s CPU 0.12s WALL ( 2 calls)
Called by electrons:
c_bands : 0.51s CPU 0.52s WALL ( 18 calls)
sum_band : 0.05s CPU 0.06s WALL ( 18 calls)
v_of_rho : 0.02s CPU 0.02s WALL ( 19 calls)
newd : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 19 calls)
PAW_pot : 0.29s CPU 0.35s WALL ( 21 calls)
mix_rho : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 18 calls)
Called by c_bands:
init_us_2 : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 480 calls)
cegterg : 0.49s CPU 0.50s WALL ( 180 calls)
Called by *egterg:
cdiaghg : 0.25s CPU 0.26s WALL ( 554 calls)
h_psi : 0.17s CPU 0.18s WALL ( 624 calls)
s_psi : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 624 calls)
g_psi : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 424 calls)
Called by h_psi:
h_psi:calbec : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 624 calls)
vloc_psi : 0.15s CPU 0.16s WALL ( 624 calls)
add_vuspsi : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 624 calls)
General routines
calbec : 0.01s CPU 0.01s WALL ( 1024 calls)
fft : 0.02s CPU 0.04s WALL ( 314 calls)
ffts : 0.00s CPU 0.00s WALL ( 18 calls)
fftw : 0.15s CPU 0.16s WALL ( 9410 calls)
Parallel routines
PWSCF : 1.32s CPU 1.47s WALL
This run was terminated on: 13:34:52 2Feb2021
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
JOB DONE.
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=