0046de17e5
1. In the top level of ParseStatementOrDeclaration, don't eat a } if we
just parsed a statement if it list there. Also, don't even bother
emitting an error about a missing semicolon if the statement had a
bug (an rbrace is fine).
2. In do/while parsing, don't require a 'while' to be present if the do
body didn't parse.
This allows us to generate a clean diagnostic for this code:
t.c:1:22: error: expected expression
void foo (void) { do . while (0); }
^
Thanks to Neil for pointing this out.
llvm-svn: 59256
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Analysis | ||
| CodeGen | ||
| CodeGenObjC | ||
| Coverage | ||
| Driver | ||
| Lexer | ||
| Misc | ||
| Parser | ||
| Preprocessor | ||
| Rewriter | ||
| Sema | ||
| SemaCXX | ||
| SemaObjC | ||
| SemaObjCXX | ||
| Serialization | ||
| Makefile | ||
| TestRunner.sh | ||