hanchenye-llvm-project/clang/test/CXX/class.access/class.protected
John McCall 417e74491c Add a quick-and-dirty hack to give a better diagnostic for [class.protected]
restrictions.  The note's not really on the right place given its wording,
but putting a second note on the call site (or muddying the wording) doesn't
appeal.

There are corner cases where this can be wrong, but I'm not concerned.

llvm-svn: 112950
2010-09-03 04:56:05 +00:00
..
p1.cpp Add a quick-and-dirty hack to give a better diagnostic for [class.protected] 2010-09-03 04:56:05 +00:00