Craig Silverstein 20f7ab72b1 The type-to-delete may not be a pointer if it's a dependent type. ... Here's example code: --- template<class T> class MyClass { struct S { }; S* NewS() { return new S; } void DeleteS() { delete NewS(); } }; --- CXXDeleteExpr::getDestroyedType() on the 'delete NewS()' expression would crash before this change. Now it returns a dependent type object. Solution suggested by dgregor. llvm-svn: 116891		2010-10-20 00:38:15 +00:00
clang	The type-to-delete may not be a pointer if it's a dependent type.	2010-10-20 00:38:15 +00:00
compiler-rt	make: Add CheckCommandLineOverrides to my little Makefile library, a routine for	2010-10-14 21:23:37 +00:00
debuginfo-tests	testcase commit for upcoming fix.	2010-09-21 20:51:54 +00:00
libcxx	atomic_schar, atomic_uchar, atomic_short, atomic_ushort, atomic_int, atomic_uint, atomic_long, atomic_ulong, atomic_llong, atomic_ullong, atomic_char16_t, atomic_char32_t and atomic_wchar_t.	2010-10-19 21:22:10 +00:00
lldb	Fixed a silly bug that was causing the "this" pointer	2010-10-19 23:57:21 +00:00
llvm	Make CodeGen TBAA-aware.	2010-10-20 00:31:05 +00:00