Introduce support for accepting ops instead of values when constructing ops. A
single-result op can be used instead of a value, including in lists of values,
and any op can be used instead of a list of values. This is similar to, but
more powerful, than the C++ API that allows for implicitly casting an OpType to
Value if it is statically known to have a single result - the cast in Python is
based on the op dynamically having a single result, and also handles the
multi-result case. This allows to build IR in a more concise way:
op = dialect.produce_multiple_results()
other = dialect.produce_single_result()
dialect.consume_multiple_results(other, op)
instead of having to access the results manually
op = dialect.produce.multiple_results()
other = dialect.produce_single_result()
dialect.consume_multiple_results(other.result, op.operation.results)
The dispatch is implemented directly in Python and is triggered automatically
for autogenerated OpView subclasses. Extension OpView classes should use the
functions provided in ods_common.py if they want to implement this behavior.
An alternative could be to implement the dispatch in the C++ bindings code, but
it would require to forward opaque types through all Python functions down to a
binding call, which makes it hard to inspect them in Python, e.g., to obtain
the types of values.
Reviewed By: gysit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111306
b164f23c29