We don't have a style guide for diagnostic messages, but convention strongly
favours the forms:
'attribute is not supported', 'unsupported attribute'
We generally avoid:
'attribute is unsupported', 'non-supported attribute'
llvm-svn: 212972
After r195009, the test would write a .o file to the test dir. Send that to
/dev/null instead. Also fix the typo in test/Frontend/invalid-o-level.c.
llvm-svn: 195047
Summary:
Currently with clang:
$ clang -O20 foo.c
error: invalid value '20' in '-O20'
With the patch:
$ clang -O20 foo.c
warning: optimization level '-O20' is unsupported; using '-O3' instead.
1 warning generated.
This matches the gcc behavior (with a warning added)
Pass all tests:
Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90..
Testing Time: 94.14s
Expected Passes : 6721
Expected Failures : 20
Unsupported Tests : 17
(which was not the case of http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2125)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2212
llvm-svn: 195009
clang -cc1 skips the driver so it never made sense to include these with the
Driver tests.
Basic type tests and flag tests generally both go in Frontend.
Now that the final -cc1 tests have been moved out of test/Driver, add a
local substitution to enforce and detect future mistakes.
These miscategorized tests were probably the source of confusion in r194817.
llvm-svn: 194919
Rafael Espindola