This radar extends the notion of one-liner summaries to automagically apply in a few interesting cases
More specifically, this checkin changes the printout of ValueObjects to print on one-line (as if type summary add -c had been applied) iff:
this ValueObject does not have a summary
its children have no synthetic children
its children are not a non-empty base class without a summary
its children do not have a summary that asks for children to show up
the aggregate length of all the names of all the children is <= 50 characters
you did not ask to see the types during a printout
your pointer depth is 0
This is meant to simplify the way LLDB shows data on screen for small structs and similarly compact data types (e.g. std::pair<int,int> anyone?)
Feedback is especially welcome on how the feature feels and corner cases where we should apply this printout and don't (or viceversa, we are applying it when we shouldn't be)
llvm-svn: 191996
DAGCombiner::visitFP_EXTEND will apply the following transformation:
fold (fpext (load x)) -> (fpext (fptrunc (extload x)))
but the implementation does not handle indexed loads (pre/post inc.), but did
not specifically ignore them either (unlike for extending loads, which it
already ignored), causing an assert when the transformation was applied to an
indexed load. This is the minimal fix for correctness (causing the
transformation to be skipped for indexed loads).
Unfortunately, I don't have an in-tree test case.
llvm-svn: 191989
The patch touches these files:
locale
array
deque
new
string
utility
vector
__bit_reference
__split_buffer
locale_win32.h
There is no intended functionality change and it is expected that reversing the position of the inline keyword with regard to the other keywords does not change the meaning of anything, least not for apple/Linux etc.
It is intended to make libcxx more consistent with itself and to prevent the 1000 or so
"inline.cpp(3) : warning C4141: 'inline' : used more than once" warnings that MS's cl.exe compiler emits without this patch, i.e. if inline is not the first keyword before a function name etc.
Prefer "inline [other inline related keyword]" over "[other related keyword] inline".
After this patch, libcxx should be consistent to this pattern.
llvm-svn: 191987
that all clients use them explicitly. This will hopefully
prevent any future confusion where things get cast to types
we don't expect.
<rdar://problem/15146458>
llvm-svn: 191984
that a function can be called in. This reduced the total number of annotations
needed and makes writing more complicated behaviour less burdensome.
Patch by chriswails@gmail.com.
llvm-svn: 191983
This patch handles LLVM standalone assembler (llvm-mc) ELF flag setting based on input file
directive processing.
Mips assembly requires processing inline directives that directly and
indirectly affect the output ELF header flags. This patch handles one
".abicalls".
To process these directives we are following the model the code generator
uses by storing state in a container as we go through processing and when
we detect the end of input file processing, AsmParser is notified and we
update the ELF header flags through a MipsELFStreamer method with a call from
MCTargetAsmParser::emitEndOfAsmFile(MCStreamer &OutStreamer).
This patch will allow other targets the same functionality.
Jack
llvm-svn: 191982
Sort the operands of the other entries in the current vectorization root
according to the first entry's operands opcodes.
%conv0 = uitofp ...
%load0 = load float ...
= fmul %conv0, %load0
= fmul %load0, %conv1
= fmul %load0, %conv2
Make sure that we recursively vectorize <%conv0, %conv1, %conv2> and <%load0,
%load0, %load0>.
This makes it more likely to obtain vectorizable trees. We have to be careful
when we sort that we don't destroy 'good' existing ordering implied by source
order.
radar://15080067
llvm-svn: 191977
(assign/unsafe_unretained/weak/retain/strong/copy) in super class
to be overridden by a property with any explicit ownership in the
subclass. // rdar://15014468
llvm-svn: 191971
optimizeSelect folds (predicated) copy instructions, it must not ignore
the original register class of the operand when replacing the register
with the copies dest register.
llvm-svn: 191963
The jump doesn't really kill the registers, the following call does but
we never get back anyway.
This avoids some verify-machineinstrs problems when TAILJUMPs are
if-converted.
llvm-svn: 191962
These IR instructions are undefined when the amount is equal to operand
size, but NEON right shifts support such shifts. Work around that by
emitting a different IR in these cases.
llvm-svn: 191953
Eric Christopher