Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Daniel Dunbar 8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar a45cf5b6b0 Rename clang to clang-cc.
Tests and drivers updated, still need to shuffle dirs.

llvm-svn: 67602
2009-03-24 02:24:46 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar e03c6102cc Handle #pragma pack(0). I left this out of diagnostic because users should
really use pack() instead.
 - <rdar://problem/6650243> clang warns about '#pragma pack(0)'

llvm-svn: 66287
2009-03-06 20:45:54 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 4290d46bd4 Implement #pragma pack use in structure packing. The general approach
is to encode the state of the #pragma pack stack as an attribute when
the structure is declared. 

 - Extend PackedAttr to take an alignment (in bits), and reuse for
   both __attribute__((packed)) (which takes no argument, instead
   packing tightly (to "minimize the memory required") and for #pragma
   pack (which allows specification of the maximum alignment in
   bytes). __attribute__((packed)) is just encoded as Alignment=1.

   This conflates two related but different mechanisms, but it didn't
   seem worth another attribute.

 - I have attempted to follow the MSVC semantics as opposed to the gcc
   ones, since if I understand correctly #pragma pack originated with
   MSVC. The semantics are generally equivalent except when the stack
   is altered during the definition of a structure; its not clear if
   anyone does this in practice. See testcase if curious.

llvm-svn: 57623
2008-10-16 02:34:03 +00:00