Up until now, all references to `errno` were marked with `NOLINT`, since
it was technically calling an external function. This fixes the lint
rules so that `errno`, as well as `malloc`, `calloc`, `realloc`, and
`free` are all allowed to be called as external functions. All of the
relevant `NOLINT` comments have been removed, and the documentation has
been updated.
Reviewed By: sivachandra, lntue, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113946
The google-readability-casting check is meant to be on par
with cpplint's readability/casting check, according to the
documentation. However it currently does not diagnose
functional casts, like:
float x = 1.5F;
int y = int(x);
This is detected by cpplint, however, and the guidelines
are clear that such a cast is only allowed when the type
is a class type (constructor call):
> You may use cast formats like `T(x)` only when `T` is a class type.
Therefore, update the clang-tidy check to check this
case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114427
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48613.
llvm-header-guard is suggesting header guards with leading underscores
if the header file path begins with a '/' or similar special character.
Only reserved identifiers should begin with an underscore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114149
Bitfields are special. Due to integral promotion [conv.prom/5] bitfield
member access expressions are frequently wrapped by an implicit cast to
`int` if that type can represent all the values of the bitfield.
Consider these examples:
struct SmallBitfield { unsigned int id : 4; };
x.id & 1; (case-1)
x.id & 1u; (case-2)
x.id << 1u; (case-3)
(unsigned)x.id << 1; (case-4)
Due to the promotion rules, we would get a warning for case-1. It's
debatable how useful this is, but the user at least has a convenient way
of //fixing// it by adding the `u` unsigned-suffix to the literal as
demonstrated by case-2. However, this won't work for shift operators like
the one in case-3. In case of a normal binary operator, both operands
contribute to the result type. However, the type of the shift expression is
the promoted type of the left operand. One could still suppress this
superfluous warning by explicitly casting the bitfield member access as
case-4 demonstrates, but why? The compiler already knew that the value from
the member access should safely fit into an `int`, why do we have this
warning in the first place? So, hereby we suppress this specific scenario,
when a bitfield's value is implicitly cast to int (likely due to integral
promotion).
Note that the bitshift operation might invoke unspecified/undefined
behavior, but that's another topic, this checker is about detecting
conversion-related defects.
Example AST for `x.id << 1`:
BinaryOperator 'int' '<<'
|-ImplicitCastExpr 'int' <IntegralCast>
| `-ImplicitCastExpr 'unsigned int' <LValueToRValue>
| `-MemberExpr 'unsigned int' lvalue bitfield .id
| `-DeclRefExpr 'SmallBitfield' lvalue ParmVar 'x' 'SmallBitfield'
`-IntegerLiteral 'int' 1
Reviewed By: courbet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114105
Invalid SourceRanges can occur generally if the code does not compile,
thus we expect clang error diagnostics.
Unlike `clang`, `clang-tidy` did not swallow invalid source ranges, but
tried to highlight them, and blow various assertions.
The following two examples produce invalid source ranges, but this is
not a complete list:
void test(x); // error: unknown type name 'x'
struct Foo {
member; // error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
};
Thanks @whisperity helping me fix this.
Reviewed-By: xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114254
The `cppcoreguidelines-virtual-base-class-destructor` checker crashed on
this example:
#define DECLARE(CLASS) \
class CLASS { \
protected: \
virtual ~CLASS(); \
}
DECLARE(Foo); // no-crash
The checker will hit the following assertion:
clang-tidy: llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h:196: T &llvm::optional_detail::OptionalStorage<clang::Token, true>::getValue() & [T = clang::Token]: Assertion `hasVal' failed."
It turns out, `Lexer::findNextToken()` returned `llvm::None` within the
`getVirtualKeywordRange()` function when the `VirtualEndLoc`
SourceLocation represents a macro expansion.
To prevent this from happening, I decided to propagate the `llvm::None`
further up and only create the removal of `virtual` if the
`getVirtualKeywordRange()` succeeds.
I considered an alternative fix for this issue:
I could have checked the `Destructor.getLocation().isMacroID()` before
doing any Fixit calculation inside the `check()` function.
In contrast to this approach my patch will preserve the diagnostics and
drop the fixits only if it would have crashed.
Reviewed By: whisperity
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113558
When a symbol comes from the non self-contained header, we recursively uplift
the file we consider used to the first includer that has a header guard. We
need to do this while we still have FileIDs because every time a non
self-contained header is included, it gets a new FileID but is later
deduplicated by HeaderID and it's not possible to understand where it was
included from.
Based on D114370.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114623
[NFC] As part of using inclusive language within the llvm project, this patch
replaces master with main in `SubModule2.h`.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114100
This fixes "textDocument/prepareCallHierarchy" in clangd for ObjC methods. Details at https://github.com/clangd/vscode-clangd/issues/247.
clangd uses Decl::isFunctionOrFunctionTemplate to check if the decl given in a prepareCallHierarchy request is eligible for prepareCallHierarchy. We change to use isFunctionOrMethod which includes functions and ObjC methods.
Reviewed By: kadircet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114058
`isConstRefReturningMethodCall` should be considering
`CXXOperatorCallExpr` in addition to `CXXMemberCallExpr`. Clang considers
these to be distinct (`CXXOperatorCallExpr` derives from `CallExpr`, not
`CXXMemberCallExpr`), but we don't care in the context of this
check.
This is important because of
`std::vector<Expensive>::operator[](size_t) const`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114249
The configuration may kick off indexing, which may involve sending LSP
messages.
The crash is fiddly to reproduce in a hermetic test (we need background
indexing on without disk storage, and to handle server->client messages
in LSPClient...)
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/926
Overriding methods should not get a readability-identifier-naming
warning because the issue can only be fixed in the base class; but the
current check for whether a method is overriding does not take the
override attribute into account.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113830
The clang-tidy/infrastructure/pr37091.cpp test inherits the top-level .clang-tidy configuration because it doesn't specify its own checks. It'd be a more stable test if it operates independently of the top-level .clang-tidy settings.
I've made the clang-tidy/infrastructure/pr37091.cpp test independent of the top-level .clang-tidy (picked an arbitrary check that I saw another clang-tidy/infrastructure test was also using: clang-tidy/infrastructure/temporaries.cpp)
Reviewed By: kbobyrev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114034
This covers both C-style variadic functions and template variadic w/
parameter packs.
Previously we would return no signatures when working with template
variadic functions once activeParameter reached the position of the
parameter pack (except when it was the only param, then we'd still
show it when no arguments were given). With this commit, we now show
signathure help correctly.
Additionally, this commit fixes the activeParameter value in LSP output
of clangd in the presence of variadic functions (both kinds). LSP does
not allow the activeParamter to be higher than the number of parameters
in the active signature. With "..." or parameter pack being just one
argument, for all but first argument passed to "..." we'd report
incorrect activeParameter value. Clients such as VSCode would then treat
it as 0, as suggested in the spec) and highlight the wrong parameter.
In the future, we should add support for per-signature activeParamter
value, which exists in LSP since 3.16.0. This is not part of this
commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111318
This is a cleanup of the only llvm-prefer-isa-or-dyn-cast-in-conditionals finding in the clangd code base. This patch was created by automatically applying the fixes from clang-tidy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113899
This will drop file version information from span names, reducing
overall cardinality and also effect logging when skipping actions in scheduler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113390
Cleanup of clang-tidy findings: removing "else" after a return statement
to improve readability of the code.
This patch was created by applying the clang-tidy fixes automatically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113892
The overload shouldSuppressDiagnostic seems unnecessary, and it is only
used in clangd.
This patch removes it and use the real one (suppression diagnostics are
discarded in clangd at the moment).
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/929
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113999
Cleaning up unused "using" declarations.
This patch was generated from automatically applyning clang-tidy fixes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113891
Fixes PR#52400. The tests for bugprone-throw-keyword-missing actually
already contain exceptions as class members, but not as members with
initializers, which was probably just an oversight.
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
modernize-loop-convert checks and fixes when a loop that iterates over the
elements of a container can be rewritten from a for(...; ...; ...) style into
the "new" C++11 for-range format. For that, it needs to parse the elements of
that loop, like its init-statement, such as ItType it = cont.begin().
modernize-loop-convert checks whether the loop variable is initialized by a
begin() member function.
When an iterator is initialized with a conversion operator (e.g. for
(const_iterator it = non_const_container.begin(); ...), attempts to retrieve the
name of the initializer expression resulted in an assert, as conversion
operators don't have a valid IdentifierInfo.
I fixed this by making digThroughConstructors dig through conversion operators
as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113201
Fixes PR#38187. Constructors are actually already checked,
but only as functions, i.e. the check only looks at the
constructor body and not at the initializers, which misses
the (common) case where constructor parameters are moved
as part of an initializer expression.
One remaining false negative is when both the move //and//
the use-after-move occur in constructor initializers.
This is a lot more difficult to handle, though, because
the `bugprone-use-after-move` check is currently based on
a CFG that only takes the body into account, not the
initializers, so e.g. initialization order would have to
manually be considered. I will file a follow-up issue for
this once PR#38187 is closed.
Reviewed By: carlosgalvezp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113708
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
- Jaro–Winkler and Sørensen–Dice should use en-dashes not regular
dashes. In reStructuredText this is typed as `--`.
- Letters at the beginning of a sentence should be capitalized.
Michael Jones