This way does not require a __sanitizer_cov_dump() call. That's
important on Android, where apps can be killed at arbitrary time.
We write raw PCs to disk instead of module offsets; we also write
memory layout to a separate file. This increases dump size by the
factor of 2 on 64-bit systems.
llvm-svn: 209653
A test in test/Generic creates a DAG where the NZCV output of an ADCS is used
by multiple nodes. This makes LLVM want to save a copy of NZCV for later, which
it couldn't do before.
This should be the last fix required for the aarch64 buildbot.
llvm-svn: 209651
Cortex-M4 only has single-precision floating point support, so any LLVM
"double" type will have been split into 2 i32s by now. Fortunately, the
consecutive-register framework turns out to be precisely what's needed to
reconstruct the double and follow AAPCS-VFP correctly!
rdar://problem/17012966
llvm-svn: 209650
These are tested by test/CodeGen/Generic, so we should probably know
how to deal with them. Fortunately generic code does it if asked.
llvm-svn: 209646
Summary:
Implemented an InstCombine transformation that takes a blendv* intrinsic
call and translates it into an IR select, if the mask is constant.
This will eventually get lowered into blends with immediates if possible,
or pblendvb (with an option to further optimize if we can transform the
pblendvb into a blend+immediate instruction, depending on the selector).
It will also enable optimizations by the IR passes, which give up on
sight of the intrinsic.
Both the transformation and the lowering of its result to asm got shiny
new tests.
The transformation is a bit convoluted because of blendvp[sd]'s
definition:
Its mask is a floating point value! This forces us to convert it and get
the highest bit. I suppose this happened because the mask has type
__m128 in Intel's intrinsic and v4sf (for blendps) in gcc's builtin.
I will send an email to llvm-dev to discuss if we want to change this or
not.
Reviewers: grosbach, delena, nadav
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3859
llvm-svn: 209643
This commit is debatable. There are two possible approaches, neither
of which is really satisfactory:
1. Use "@foo(i1 zeroext)" to mean an extension to 32-bits on Darwin,
and 8 bits otherwise.
2. Redefine "@foo(i1)" to mean that the i1 is extended by the caller
to 8 bits. This goes against the spirit of "zeroext" I think, but
it's a bit of a vague construct anyway (by definition you're going
to extend to the amount required by the ABI, that's why it's the
ABI!).
This implements option 2. The DAG machinery really isn't setup for the
first (there's a fairly strong assumption that "zeroext" goes to at
least the smallest register size), and even if it was the resulting
DAG looks like it would be inferior in many cases.
Theoretically we could add AssertZext nodes in the consumers of
ABI-passed values too now, but this actually seems to make the code
worse in practice by making truncation proceed in two steps. The code
produced is equally valid if we continue to assume only the low bit is
defined.
Should fix PR19850
llvm-svn: 209637
We can eliminate the custom C++ code in favour of some TableGen to
check the same things. Functionality should be identical, except for a
buffer overrun that was present in the C++ code and meant webkit
failed if any small argument needed to be passed on the stack.
llvm-svn: 209636
We should later rename this file (probably MIUtilSystemPOSIX), but
more clean-up is still needed here, and we can wait until we better
understand how this code may be shared between FreeBSD, Linux, and OS X.
llvm-svn: 209631
Add tests for the following transform:
str X, [x0, #32]
...
add x0, x0, #32
->
str X, [x0, #32]!
with X being either w1, x1, s0, d0 or q0.
llvm-svn: 209627
We have a couple of regression tests for load/store pairing, but (to my knowledge) there are no regression tests for the load/store + add/sub folding.
As a first step towards increased test coverage of this area, this commit adds a test for one instance of a load + add to pre-indexed load transformation.
llvm-svn: 209618
and via the command line, mirroring similar functionality in LoopUnroll. In
situations where clients used custom unrolling thresholds, their intent could
previously be foiled by LoopRotate having a hardcoded threshold.
llvm-svn: 209617
This was previously regressed/broken by r192749 (reverted due to this
issue in r192938) and I was about to break it again by accident with
some more invasive changes that deal with the subprogram lists. So to
avoid that and further issues - here's a test.
It's a pretty basic test - in both r192749 and my impending case, this
test would crash, but checking the basics (that we put a subprogram in
just one of the two CUs) seems like a good start.
We still get this wrong in weird ways if the linkonce-odr function
happens to not be identical in the metadata (because it's defined in two
different files (hence the # line directives in this test), etc) even
though it meets the language requirements (identical token stream) for
such a thing. That results in two subprogram DIEs, but only one of them
gets the parameter and high/low pc information, etc. We probably need to
use the DIRef infrastructure to deduplicate functions as we do types to
address this issue - or perhaps teach the BC linker to remove the
duplicate entries in subprogram lists?
llvm-svn: 209614
Remove the use of the std::function and replace the capturing lambda with a
non-capturing one, opting to pass the user data down to the context. This is
needed as std::function is not yet available on all hosted platforms (it
requires RTTI, which breaks on Windows).
Thanks to Nico Rieck for pointing this out!
llvm-svn: 209607
Move the implementation of the Win64 EH printer from the COFFDumper into its own
class. This is in preparation for adding support to print ARM EH information.
The only real change here is in printUnwindInfo where we now lambda lift the
implicit this parameter for the resolveFunction. Also setup the printing to
handle ARM. This now has set the stage to introduce ARM EH printing.
llvm-svn: 209606
Make the use of the cache more transparent to the users. There is no reason
that the cached entries really need to be passed along. The overhead for doing
so is minimal: a single extra parameter. This requires that some standalone
functions be brought into the COFFDumper class so that they may access the
cache.
llvm-svn: 209604
Evgeniy Stepanov