A defaulted default constructor for a class X is defined as deleted if [...]
- X is a union and all of its variant members are of const-qualified type.
A pedantic reading therefore says that
union X { };
has a deleted default constructor, which is both silly and almost
certainly unintended. Pretend as if this this read
- X is a union with one or more variant members, and all of its
variant members are of const-qualified type.
llvm-svn: 151394
decent diagnostics. Finish the work of combining all the 'ShouldDelete'
functions into one. In unifying the code, fix a minor bug where an anonymous
union with a deleted default constructor as a member of a union wasn't being
considered as making the outer union's default constructor deleted.
llvm-svn: 150862
function, provide a specialized diagnostic that indicates the kind of
special member function (default constructor, copy assignment
operator, etc.) and that it was implicitly deleted. Add a hook where
we can provide more detailed information later.
llvm-svn: 150611
I have on that's #if 0'ed out, and I don't know why it's failing to
delete the constructor. I'd appreciate if someone familiar with access
control could look into ShouldDeleteDefaultConstructor - thanks.
llvm-svn: 131486
Richard Smith