to execute the debugger command. This will result in a more semantic assert message than just the
command failed message like before:
AssertionError: False is not True : Command 'thread list' returns successfully
And now, we will have:
AssertionError: False is not True : Process state is stopped due to breakpoint
llvm-svn: 117569
the breakpoint associated with the (filename, line_number) combo when an arrow is pointing to
a source position using Emacs Grand Unified Debugger library to interact with lldb.
The current implmentation is insufficient in that it only asks the breakpoint whether it is
associated with a breakpoint resolver with FileLine type and whether it matches the (filename, line_number)
combo. There are other breakpoint resolver types whose breakpoint locations can potentially
match the (filename, line_number) combo.
The BreakpointResolver, BreakpointResolverName, BreakpointResolverAddress, and BreakpointResolverFileLine
classes have extra static classof methods to support LLVM style type inquiry through isa, cast, and dyn_cast.
The Breakpoint class has an API method bool GetMatchingFileLine(...) which is invoked from CommandObjectBreak.cpp
to implement the "breakpoint clear" command.
llvm-svn: 117562
timers to be dumped whenever the ASTUnit is destroyed. Instead, just
print the time elapsed for each operation after we perform the
operation.
llvm-svn: 117550
in the scope checker. With that done, turn an indirect goto into a
protected scope into a hard error; otherwise IR generation has to start
worrying about declarations not dominating their scopes, as exemplified
in PR8473.
If this really affects anyone, I can probably adjust this to only hard-error
on possible indirect gotos into VLA scopes rather than arbitrary scopes.
But we'll see how people cope with the aggressive change on the marginal
feature.
llvm-svn: 117539
Thanks to Yuri Gribov and Vladimir Kirillov!
*BSD(s) have environ(7) in CRT startup and cannot resolve "environ" at linking llvm.so.
environ(7) is used inlib/System/Unix/Program.inc.
llvm-svn: 117528
is that we need more information to decide the exact conditions for whether
one ObjCObjectPointer is an acceptable return/parameter override for another,
so we're going to disable that entire class of warning for now. The
"forward developement" warning category, -Wmethod-signatures, can receive
unrestricted feature work, and when we're happy with how it acts, we'll
turn it on by default.
This is a pretty conservative change, and nobody's totally content with it.
llvm-svn: 117524
- For now, loads of [r, r] addressing mode is the same as the
[r, r lsl/lsr/asr #] variants. ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatency() should
identify the former case and reduce the output latency by 1.
- Also identify [r, r << 2] case. This special form of shifter addressing mode
is "free".
llvm-svn: 117519
Johnny Chen