properties (direct or indirect) setter/getter (or declared
methods as well) are seen by the method implementation type
matching logic before declaration of method in super class
is seen. This fixes the warning coming out of that method mismatch.
// rdar://14650159
llvm-svn: 188438
when result type of protocol property and getter method
differ by fixing a more serious problem. When a forward
protocol declaration comes between its definition and
its use in class protocol list, the forward protocol
ast was being used in building the protocol list.
// rdar://12522752
llvm-svn: 179108
The warning this inhibits, -Wobjc-root-class, is opt-in for now. However, all clang unit tests that would trigger
the warning have been updated to use -Wno-objc-root-class. <rdar://problem/7446698>
llvm-svn: 154187
is that we need more information to decide the exact conditions for whether
one ObjCObjectPointer is an acceptable return/parameter override for another,
so we're going to disable that entire class of warning for now. The
"forward developement" warning category, -Wmethod-signatures, can receive
unrestricted feature work, and when we're happy with how it acts, we'll
turn it on by default.
This is a pretty conservative change, and nobody's totally content with it.
llvm-svn: 117524
covariant/contravariant overrides and implementations, but do so under
control of a new flag (-Wno-objc-covariant-overrides, which yes does cover
contravariance too).
*At least* the covariance cases will probably be enabled by default shortly,
but that's not totally uncontroversial.
llvm-svn: 117346
Fariborz Jahanian