Previously it would only accept a string as a GCC version if it had
either two components and no suffix, or three components with an
optional suffix.
Debian and ubuntu provided mingw compilers have lib/gcc/target entries
like "5.3-posix" and "5.3-win32". This doesn't try to make any specific
preference between them (other than lexical sorting of the suffix).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45505
llvm-svn: 330696
/usr/local/bin/ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: llvm::createAggressiveInstCombinerPass()
>>> referenced by cc1_main.cpp
>>> tools/clang/tools/driver/CMakeFiles/clang.dir/cc1_main.cpp.o:(_GLOBAL__sub_I_cc1_main.cpp)
And so on
The bot coverage is clearly missing.
llvm-svn: 330694
/usr/local/bin/ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: llvm::createAggressiveInstCombinerPass()
>>> referenced by cc1_main.cpp
>>> tools/clang/tools/driver/CMakeFiles/clang.dir/cc1_main.cpp.o:(_GLOBAL__sub_I_cc1_main.cpp)
And so on
The bot coverage is clearly missing.
llvm-svn: 330693
All attributes have a source range associated with it. However, implicit
attributes are added by the compiler, and not added because the user
wrote something in the input. So no token type should be set to
CXCursor_*Attr.
The problem was visible when a class gets marked by e.g.
MSInheritanceAttr, which has the full CXXRecordDecl's range as its
own range. The effect of marking that range as CXCursor_UnexposedAttr
was that all cursors for the record decl, including all child decls,
would become CXCursor_UnexposedAttr.
llvm-svn: 330692
Summary:
I am preparing a patch to the path function. While working on it, I
noticed that some of the areas are lacking test coverage (e.g. filename
and parent_path functions), so I add more tests to guard against
regressions there.
I have also found the failure messages hard to understand, so I rewrote
some existing test to give more actionable messages when they fail:
- for tests which run over multiple inputs, I use SCOPED_TRACE, to show
which of the inputs caused the actual failure.
- for comparisons of vectors, I use gmock's container matchers, which
will print out the full container contents (and the elements that
differ) when they fail to match.
Reviewers: zturner, espindola
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45941
llvm-svn: 330691
It doesn't make sense to non-deterministically choose between
`CopyPart(..)` and `InsertPart(..)` when it is known that
`InsertPart(..)` will fail.
This upstream's a change from JFS solver's fork of LibFuzzer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45693
llvm-svn: 330687
Add explicit dependency on ObjcopyTableGen
and rerun the tests on Windows.
I will double-check the build bots
and revert this commit if necessary.
llvm-svn: 330685
This encoding is recognized by the CPU, but the behavior is undefined. This makes the disassembler handle it correctly so we don't print bswapl with a 16-bit register.
llvm-svn: 330682
The unmasked versions already didn't have this restrction. I don't think gcc or icc limit these to 64-bit mode so we shouldn't either.
llvm-svn: 330681
This code path can very clearly be called in a context where we have
baselined all the cloned blocks to a particular loop and are trying to
handle nested subloops. There is no harm in this, so just relax the
assert. I've added a test case that will make sure we actually exercise
this code path.
llvm-svn: 330680
The test is apparently needed e.g. for check-cfi on Windows where we get
'C:/b/slave/sanitizer-windows/build/./bin/clang.exe': command not found
without it. Try to fix the problem that was fixed by r330672 by also checking
for isabs() instead.
llvm-svn: 330673
lit's util.which() would check if the passed-in path existed directly,
and if so return it as-is. This is never the case when running llvm's, clang's,
or lld's tests normally. But when running `./llvm-lit path/to/clang/test`
with a cwd of llvm-build/bin, this if would detect that clang exists at path
'clang' and return 'clang' as the discovered clang binary -- and then lit would
use the " clang " -> "*** Do not use 'clang' in tests, use '%clang'. ***"
substitution to replace that with a broken test. By removing this early
return, lit ends up with the usual absolute path and everything works even
in this uncommon case.
llvm-svn: 330672
(notionally Scalar.h is part of libLLVMScalarOpts, so it shouldn't be
included by InstCombine which doesn't/shouldn't need to depend on
ScalarOpts)
llvm-svn: 330669
I was reminded today that this patch got reverted in r301885. I can no
longer reproduce the failure that caused the revert locally (...almost
one year later), and the patch applied pretty cleanly, so I guess we'll
see if the bots still get angry about it.
The original breakage was InstSimplify complaining (in "assertion
failed" form) about getting passed some crazy IR when running `ninja
check-sanitizer`. I'm unable to find traces of what, exactly, said crazy
IR was. I suppose we'll find out pretty soon if that's still the case.
:)
Original commit:
Author: gbiv
Date: Mon May 1 18:12:08 2017
New Revision: 301880
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=301880&view=rev
Log:
[InstSimplify] Handle selects of GEPs with 0 offset
In particular (since it wouldn't fit nicely in the summary):
(select (icmp eq V 0) P (getelementptr P V)) -> (getelementptr P V)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31435
llvm-svn: 330667
As we're becoming stricter w/ respect to not allowing vregs having LLTs
and regclasses assigned both mid-globalisel pipeline, the number of
extra copies grows, some of which separate G_UNMERGE's from their
corresponding G_MERGE's, becoming a performance concern.
It's worth mentioning that we're already looking through copies while
combining legalization artifacts for every kind of artifact but
G_UNMERGE.
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, volkan, javed.absar
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45644
llvm-svn: 330660
This makes it return the right result in a couple of edge cases. The
wide versions always do the comparison on the underlying wchar_t type.
llvm-svn: 330656
There are 3 changes:
* Renamed genertor.pass.cpp to generator.pass.cpp
* Removed nothing_to_do.pass.cpp
* Mark GCC 4.9 as UNSUPPORTED for the test files that have negative
narrowing conversion SFINAE test (see GCC PR63723).
llvm-svn: 330655
If a loop with child loops becomes our new inner loop after
interchanging, we only need to update LoopInfo for the blocks defined in
the old outer loop. BBs in child loops will stay there.
Reviewers: efriedma, karthikthecool, mcrosier
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45970
llvm-svn: 330653
A small but substantial minority of libFuzzer-based fuzzers run code that
does not play well with fork in global constructors or LLVMFuzzerInitialize.
This patch allows these fuzzers to use afl_driver by allowing them to
opt-out of using AFL's deferred forkserver which deferres calling fork until
after this code.
Patch By: metzman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45744
llvm-svn: 330652
Summary:
It seems there isn't much enthusiasm for `-wtest` D45685.
This is more conservative version, which i had in the very first
revision of D44883, but that 'erroneously' got removed because of the review.
**Based on some [irc] discussions, it must really be documented that
we want all the new diagnostics to have their own flags, to ease
rollouts, transitions, etc.**
Please do note that i'm only adding `-Wno-self-assign-overloaded`,
but not `-Wno-self-assign-field-overloaded`, because i'm honestly
not aware of any false-positives from the `-field` variant,
but i can just as easily add it if wanted.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44883#1068561
Reviewers: dblaikie, aaron.ballman, thakis, rjmccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, chandlerc, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45766
llvm-svn: 330651
Sander de Smalen