Patch from Arthur O'Dwyer.
`__user_alloc_construct_impl` is used by <experimental/memory_resource>, but
this `__user_alloc_construct` is never used.
Also, `<experimental/memory_resource>` doesn't need a full definition of
`std::tuple`; just the forward declaration in `<__tuple>` will suffice.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D46806
llvm-svn: 334069
C++2a[container.requirements.general]p8 states that when move constructing
a container, the allocator is move constructed. Vector previously copy
constructed these allocators. This patch fixes that bug.
Additionally it cleans up some unnecessary allocator conversions
when copy constructing containers. Libc++ uses
__internal_allocator_traits::select_on_copy_construction to select
the correct allocator during copy construction, but it unnecessarily
converted the resulting allocator to the user specified allocator
type and back. After this patch list and forward_list no longer
do that.
Technically we're supposed to be using allocator_traits<allocator_type>::select_on_copy_construction,
but that should seemingly be addressed as a separate patch, if at all.
llvm-svn: 334053
These containers type-punned between pair<K, V> and pair<const K, V> as an
optimization. This commit instead provides access to the pair via a pair of
references that assign through to the underlying object. It's still undefined to
mutate a const object, but clang doesn't optimize on this for data members, so
this should be safe.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47607
llvm-svn: 333948
Summary:
C++11 onwards specs the non-member functions atomic_load and atomic_load_explicit as taking the atomic<T> by const (potentially volatile) pointer. C11, in its infinite wisdom, decided to drop the const, and C17 will fix this with DR459 (the current draft forgot to fix B.16, but that’s not the normative part).
This patch fixes the libc++ version of the __c11_atomic_load builtins defined for GCC's compatibility sake.
D47618 takes care of the clang side.
Discussion: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-May/058129.html
<rdar://problem/27426936>
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47613
llvm-svn: 333776
Summary:
The filesystem test was confused about access versus write / modification time. The spec says:
file_time_type last_write_time(const path& p, error_code& ec) noexcept;
Returns: The time of last data modification of p, determined as if by the value of the POSIX stat structure member st_mtime obtained as if by POSIX stat(). The signature with argument ec returns file_time_type::min() if an error occurs.
The test was looking at st_atime, not st_mtime, when comparing the result from last_write_time. That was probably due to using a pair instead of naming things nicely or using types. I opted to rename things so it's clearer.
This used to cause test bot failures.
<rdar://problem/40648859>
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, aemerson
Subscribers: christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47557
llvm-svn: 333723
r333467 updated the symbols exported by libc++.so/dylib by changing
the ODR usage of __uncaught_exception/__uncaught_exceptions. This
should not be a breaking change.
llvm-svn: 333481
Patch from Arthur O'Dwyer.
In the TS, `uses_allocator` construction for `pair` tried to use an allocator
type of `memory_resource*`, which is incorrect because `memory_resource*` is
not an allocator type. LWG 2969 fixed it to use `polymorphic_allocator` as the
allocator type instead.
https://wg21.link/lwg2969
(D47090 included this in `<memory_resource>`; at Eric's request, I've split
this out into its own patch applied to the existing
`<experimental/memory_resource>` instead.)
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D47109
llvm-svn: 333384
That's r333325, as well as follow-up "Fix GCC handling of ATOMIC_VAR_INIT"
r333327.
Marshall asked to revert:
Let's have a discussion about how to implement this so that it is more friendly
to people with installed code bases. We've had *extremely* loud responses to
unilaterally adding warnings - especially ones that can't be easily disabled -
to the libc++ code base in the past.
llvm-svn: 333351
r333325 from D47225 added warning checks, and the test was written to be C++11 correct by using ATOMIC_VAR_INIT (note that the committee fixed that recently...). It seems like GCC can't handle ATOMIC_VAR_INIT well because it generates 'type 'std::atomic<int>' cannot be initialized with an initializer list' on bot libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx03. Drop the ATOMIC_VAR_INITs since they weren't required to test the diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 333327
Summary:
The atomic non-member functions accept pointers to std::atomic / std::atomic_flag as well as to the non-atomic value. These are all dereferenced unconditionally when lowered, and therefore will fault if null. It's a tiny gotcha for new users, especially when they pass in NULL as expected value (instead of passing a pointer to a NULL value). We can therefore use the nonnull attribute to denote that:
- A warning should be generated if the argument is null
- It is undefined behavior if the argument is null (because a dereference will segfault)
This patch adds support for this attribute for clang and GCC, and sticks to the subset of the syntax both supports. In particular, work around this GCC oddity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60625
The attributes are documented:
- https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.0/gcc/Function-Attributes.html
- https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#nullability-attributes
I'm authoring a companion clang patch for the __c11_* and __atomic_* builtins, which currently only warn on a subset of the pointer parameters.
In all cases the check needs to be explicit and not use the empty nonnull list, because some of the overloads are for atomic<T*> and the values themselves are allowed to be null.
<rdar://problem/18473124>
Reviewers: arphaman, EricWF
Subscribers: aheejin, christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47225
llvm-svn: 333325
Some *_l functions were not available in some versions of Bionic. This CL
checks that the NDK version supports the functions, and if not, falls back
on the corresponding functions that don't take a locale.
Patch by Tom Anderson!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46558
llvm-svn: 332543
C11 defines `kill_dependency` as a macro in <stdatomic.h>. When you
include <atomic> after <stdatomic.h>, the macro clashes with
`std::kill_dependency` and causes multiple errors. Explicit error should
help in diagnosing those errors.
No change for working code that includes <atomic> before <stdatomic.h>.
rdar://problem/27435938
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF, mclow.lists, jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Subscribers: jfb, jkorous-apple, christof, bumblebritches57, JonChesterfield, smeenai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45470
llvm-svn: 332413
Checking for complete types is really rather tricky when you consider
the amount of specializations required to check a function type. This
specifically caused PR37407 where we incorrectly diagnosed
noexcept function types as incomplete (but there were plenty of other
cases that would cause this).
This patch removes the complete type checking for now. I'm going
to look into adding a clang builtin to correctly do this for us.
llvm-svn: 332040
Eric Fiselier