No-one was using this, and it's not meaningful in general -- FrontendActions
can be run on inputs that don't have a corresponding source file. The current
frontend input can be obtained by asking the FrontendAction if any future
action actually needs it.
llvm-svn: 305045
Now FixedCompilationDatabase::loadFromCommandLine has no means to report
which error occurred if it fails to create compilation object. This is
a block for implementing D33013, because after that change driver will
refuse to create compilation if command line contains erroneous options.
This change adds additional argument to loadFromCommandLine, which is
assigned error message text if compilation object was not created. This is
the same way as other methods of CompilationDatabase report failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33272
llvm-svn: 303741
Summary: This is the first change as part of developing a clang-query based search and replace tool.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, ioeric, sbenza, jbangert
Reviewed By: ioeric, jbangert
Subscribers: sbenza, ioeric, cfe-commits
Patch by Julian Bangert!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29621
llvm-svn: 302624
The previous algorithm processed one character at a time, which is very
painful on a modern CPU. Replace it with xxHash64, which both already
exists in the codebase and is fairly fast.
Patch from Scott Smith!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32509
llvm-svn: 301487
Summary: ... which applies a set of `AtomicChange`s on code.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30777
llvm-svn: 298913
Summary:
An AtomicChange is used to create and group a set of source edits, e.g.
replacements or header insertions. Edits in an AtomicChange should be related,
e.g. replacements for the same type reference and the corresponding header
insertion/deletion.
An AtomicChange is uniquely identified by a key position and will either be
fully applied or not applied at all. The key position should be the location
of the key syntactical element that is being changed, e.g. the call to a
refactored method.
Next step: add a tool that applies AtomicChange.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: alexshap, cfe-commits, djasper, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27054
llvm-svn: 296616
Add a field indicating the associated check for every replacement to the YAML
report generated with the '-export-fixes' option. Update
clang-apply-replacements to handle the new format.
Patch by Alpha Abdoulaye!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26137
llvm-svn: 290892
copy constructors of classes with array members, instead using
ArrayInitLoopExpr to represent the initialization loop.
This exposed a bug in the static analyzer where it was unable to differentiate
between zero-initialized and unknown array values, which has also been fixed
here.
llvm-svn: 289618
While C(++) and ObjC are generally formatted the same way and can be
mixed, people might want to choose different styles based on the
language. This patch recognizes .m and .mm files as ObjC and also
implements a very crude detection of whether or not a .h file contains
ObjC code. This can be improved over time.
Also move most of the ObjC tests into their own test file to keep file
size maintainable.
llvm-svn: 289428
In bigger projects like an Operating System, the same source code is
often compiled in slightly different ways. This could be the difference
between PIC and non-PIC code for static vs dynamic libraries, it could
also be the difference between size optimised versions of tools for
ramdisk images. At the moment, the compilation database has no way to
distinguish such cases. As first step, add a field in the JSON format
for it and process it accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27138
llvm-svn: 288436
On Windows, Clang is mangling lambdas in default member initializers
incorrectly. See PR31197.
This is causing redness on the self-host bots. Work around the problem
locally so we aren't blind to further issues.
llvm-svn: 288089
Summary:
If the `FromDecl` is a class forward declaration, the reference is
still considered as referring to the original definition given the nature
of forward-declarations, so we can't do a raw name replacement in this case.
Reviewers: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27132
llvm-svn: 287929
Summary:
For example, this case was missed when looking for different but canonical
namespaces. UseContext in this case should be considered as in the canonical
namespace.
```
namespace a { namespace b { <FromContext> } }
namespace a { namespace b { namespace c { <UseContext> } } }
```
Added some commenting.
Reviewers: bkramer
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27125
llvm-svn: 287924
Summary:
The new error information contains the type of error (e.g. overlap or bad file path)
and the replacement(s) that is causing the error. This enables us to resolve some errors.
For example, for insertion at the same location conflict, we need to know the
existing replacement which conflicts with the new replacement in order to calculate
the new position to be insert before/after the existing replacement (for merging).
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer
Subscribers: djasper, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26853
llvm-svn: 287639
Summary:
The current version does not deduplicate equivalent file paths correctly.
For example, a relative path and an absolute path are considered inequivalent.
Comparing FileEnry addresses these issues.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: alexshap, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26288
llvm-svn: 286096
Summary:
The matcher
varDecl(hasDescendant(
callExpr(hasDeclaration(functionDecl(unless(isNoThrow()))))))
didn't match calls from default arguments because the expression
for a CXXDefaultArgExpr was not visited.
Reviewers: klimek, jdennett, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25992
llvm-svn: 285239
Summary:
If there are multiple <File, Replacements> pairs with the same file
path after removing dots, we only keep one pair (with path after dots being
removed) and discard the rest.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, hokein, bkramer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25565
llvm-svn: 284219
Summary:
Now two replacements are considered order-independent if applying them in
either order produces the same result. These include (but not restricted
to) replacements that:
- don't overlap (being directly adjacent is fine) and
- are overlapping deletions.
- are insertions at the same offset and applying them in either order
has the same effect, i.e. X + Y = Y + X if one inserts text X and the
other inserts text Y.
Discussion about this design can be found in D24717
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Subscribers: omtcyfz, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24800
llvm-svn: 282577
Summary:
Diff to r281457:
- added a test case `CalculateRangesOfInsertionAroundReplacement`.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24606
llvm-svn: 281891
Summary:
Extend `tooling::Replacements::add()` to support adding order-independent replacements.
Two replacements are considered order-independent if one of the following conditions is true:
- They do not overlap. (This is already supported.)
- One replacement is insertion, and the other is a replacement with
length > 0, and the insertion is adjecent to but not contained in the
other replacement. In this case, the replacement should always change
the original code instead of the inserted text.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24515
llvm-svn: 281457
r271042 changed the way the diagnostic arguments are parsed. It assumes that
the diagnostics options were already parsed by the "Driver".
For tools using clang::Tooling, the diagnostics argument were not parsed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23837
llvm-svn: 280118
This patch introduced the ability to decide at runtime whether to parse
JSON compilation database command lines using Gnu syntax or Windows
syntax. However, there were many existing unit tests written that
hardcoded Gnu-specific paths. These tests were now failing because
the auto-detection logic was choosing to parse them using Windows
rules.
This resubmission of the patch fixes this by introducing an enum
which defines the syntax mode, which defaults to auto-detect, but
for which the unit tests force Gnu style parsing.
Reviewed By: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23628
llvm-svn: 279120
Summary:
rL277342 made RecursiveASTVisitor visit lambda capture initialization
expressions (these are the Exprs in LambdaExpr::capture_inits()).
jdennett identified two issues with rL277342 (see comments there for details):
- It visits initialization expressions for implicit lambda captures, even if
shouldVisitImplicitCode() returns false.
- It visits initialization expressions for init captures twice (because these
were already traveresed in TraverseLambdaCapture() before rL277342)
This patch fixes these issues and moves the code for traversing initialization
expressions into TraverseLambdaCapture().
This patch also makes two changes required for the tests:
- It adds Lang_CXX14 to the Language enum in TestVisitor.
- It adds a parameter to ExpectedLocationVisitor::ExpectMatch() that specifies
the number of times a match is expected to be seen.
Reviewers: klimek, jdennett, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23204
llvm-svn: 278933
Previously, we would search through all replacements when inserting a
new one to check for overlaps. Instead, make use of the fact that we
already have a set of replacments without overlaps to find the potential
overlap with lower_bound.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23119
llvm-svn: 277597
Summary:
Lambda capture initializations are part of the explicit source code and
therefore should be visited by default but, so far, RecursiveASTVisitor does not
visit them.
This appears to be an oversight. Because the lambda body needs custom handling
(calling TraverseLambdaBody()), the DEF_TRAVERSE_STMT for LambdaExpr sets
ShouldVisitChildren to false but then neglects to visit the lambda capture
initializations. This patch adds code to visit the expressions associated with
lambda capture initializations.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22566
llvm-svn: 277342
Summary:
- Implement clang::tooling::Replacements as a class to provide interfaces to
control how replacements for a single file are combined and provide guarantee
on the order of replacements being applied.
- tooling::Replacements only contains replacements for the same file now.
Use std::map<std::string, tooling::Replacements> to represent multi-file
replacements.
- Error handling for the interface change will be improved in followup patches.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21748
llvm-svn: 277335
Summary:
Lambda capture initializations are part of the explicit source code and therefore should be visited by default but, so far, RecursiveASTVisitor does not visit them.
This appears to be an oversight. Because the lambda body needs custom handling (calling TraverseLambdaBody()), the DEF_TRAVERSE_STMT for LambdaExpr sets ShouldVisitChildren to false but then neglects to visit the lambda capture initializations. This patch adds code to visit the expressions associated with lambda capture initializations.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22566
llvm-svn: 276755
Summary:
[Tooling] skip anonymous namespaces when checking if typeLoc
references a type decl from a different canonical namespace.
Reviewers: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22808
llvm-svn: 276754
Summary:
return llvm::Expected<> to carry error status and error information.
This is the first step towards introducing "Error" into tooling::Replacements.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Subscribers: ioeric, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21601
llvm-svn: 275062
Summary:
Added calculateRangesAfterReplaments() to calculate original ranges as well as
newly affacted ranges in the new code.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21547
llvm-svn: 273290
- In functions with try { } catch { }, only the try block would be
skipped, not the catch blocks
- The template functions would still be parsed.
- The initializers within a constructor would still be parsed.
- The inline functions within class would still be stored, only to be
discared later.
- Invalid code with try would assert (as in "int foo() try assert_here")
This attempt to do even less while skipping function bodies.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20821
llvm-svn: 272963
Galina Kistanova