DataFlowSanitizer is a generalised dynamic data flow analysis.
Unlike other Sanitizer tools, this tool is not designed to detect a
specific class of bugs on its own. Instead, it provides a generic
dynamic data flow analysis framework to be used by clients to help
detect application-specific issues within their own code.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D965
llvm-svn: 187923
- Immediates can be shown as hex (either Intel or MASM style)
- See TestSettings.py for usage examples
- Verified to cause no regressions on Linux x86_64 (Ubuntu 12.10)
Patch by Richard Mitton!
llvm-svn: 187921
The problem was that an enum without closing semicolon could be associated as a forward enum
in an erroneous declaration, leading to the identifier being associated with the enum decl but
without a declaration actually referencing it.
This resulted in not having it serialized before serializing the identifier that is associated with.
Also prevent the ASTUnit from querying the serialized DeclID for an invalid top-level decl; it may not
have been serialized.
rdar://14539667
llvm-svn: 187914
This allows llvm-tblgen to link successfully when compiling with clang.
Both MSBuild and CMake will automatically add advapi32 as part of a set
of other dlls comprising the win32 API to the link line, but CMake
doesn't do that when compiling with clang. Until someone adds that info
to cmake upstream, this seems like a reasonable work around.
llvm-svn: 187907
In particular, left braces after an enum declaration now occur on their
own line. Further, when short ifs/whiles are allowed these no longer
cause the left brace to be on the same line as the if/while when a
brace is included.
Patch by Thomas Gibson-Robinson.
llvm-svn: 187901
Before this patch we would align
long long int big[1024];
to 4 bytes on 32 bit systems. The problem is that we were only looking
at the element type when getLargeArrayMinWidth returned non zero.
llvm-svn: 187897
This field is just IsDefaulted && !IsDeleted; in all places it's used,
a simple check for isDefaulted() is superior anyway, and we were forgetting
to set it in a few cases.
Also eliminate CXXDestructorDecl::IsImplicitlyDefined, for the same reasons.
No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 187891
If there's a race between a memory access and a free() call in the client program,
it can be reported as a use-after-free (if the access occurs after the free()) or an ordinary race
(if free() occurs after the access).
We've decided to use a single "race:" prefix for both cases instead of introducing a "use-after-free:" one,
because in many cases this allows us to keep a single suppression for both the use-after-free and free-after-use.
This may be misleading if the use-after-free occurs in a non-racy way (e.g. in a single-threaded program).
But normally such bugs shall not be suppressed.
llvm-svn: 187885
This follows the same lines as the integer code. In the end it seemed
easier to have a second 4-bit mask in TSFlags to specify the compare-like
CC values. That eats one more TSFlags bit than adding a CCHasUnordered
would have done, but it feels more concise.
llvm-svn: 187883
r187874 seems to have been missed by the build bot infrastructure, and
the subsequent commits to compiler-rt don't seem to be queuing up new
build requsets. Hopefully this will.
As it happens, having the space here is the more common formatting. =]
llvm-svn: 187879
using it to detect whether or not a terminal supports colors. This
replaces a particularly egregious hack that merely compared the TERM
environment variable to "dumb". That doesn't really translate to
a reasonable experience for users that have actually ensured their
terminal's capabilities are accurately reflected.
This makes testing a terminal for color support somewhat more expensive,
but it is called very rarely anyways. The important fast path when the
output is being piped somewhere is already in place.
The global lock may seem excessive, but the spec for calling into curses
is *terrible*. The whole library is terrible, and I spent quite a bit of
time looking for a better way of doing this before convincing myself
that this was the fundamentally correct way to behave. The damage of the
curses library is very narrowly confined, and we continue to use raw
escape codes for actually manipulating the colors which is a much sane
system than directly using curses here (IMO).
If this causes trouble for folks, please let me know. I've tested it on
Linux and will watch the bots carefully. I've also worked to account for
the variances of curses interfaces that I could finde documentation for,
but that may not have been sufficient.
llvm-svn: 187874
Peter Collingbourne