This lets us avoid a few copies that are otherwise hard to get rid of.
The way this is done is, the custom-inserter looks at the following
instruction for another CMOV, and replaces both at the same time.
A previous version used a new CMOV2 opcode, but the custom inserter
is expected to be able to return a different basic block anyway, which
means it's OK - though far from ideal - to alter that block's contents.
Explicitly document that, in case it ever makes a difference.
Alternatives welcome!
Follow-up to r231045.
rdar://19767934
Closes http://reviews.llvm.org/D8019
llvm-svn: 231046
Fold and/or of setcc's to double CMOV:
(CMOV F, T, ((cc1 | cc2) != 0)) -> (CMOV (CMOV F, T, cc1), T, cc2)
(CMOV F, T, ((cc1 & cc2) != 0)) -> (CMOV (CMOV T, F, !cc1), F, !cc2)
When we can't use the CMOV instruction, it might increase branch
mispredicts. When we can, or when there is no mispredict, this
improves throughput and reduces register pressure.
These can't be catched by generic combines, because the pattern can
appear when legalizing some instructions (such as fcmp une).
rdar://19767934
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7634
llvm-svn: 231045
Summary:
When the RHS of a conditional move node is zero, we can utilize the $zero
register by inverting the conditional move instruction and by swapping the
order of its True/False operands.
Reviewers: dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7945
llvm-svn: 230956
With initializer lists there is a really neat idiomatic way to write
this, 'ArrayRef.equals({1, 2, 3, 4, 5})'. Remove the equal method which
always had a hard limit on the number of arguments. I considered
rewriting it with variadic templates but that's not really a good fit
for a function with homogeneous arguments.
'ArrayRef == {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}' would've been even more awesome, but C++11
doesn't allow init lists with binary operators.
llvm-svn: 230907
All of the cases were just appending from random access iterators to a
vector. Using insert/append can grow the vector to the perfect size
directly and moves the growing out of the loop. No intended functionalty
change.
llvm-svn: 230845
Straightforward patch to emit an alignment directive when emitting a
TOC entry. The test case was generated from the test in PR22711 that
demonstrated a misaligned .toc section. The object code is run
through llvm-readobj to verify that the correct alignment has been
applied to the .toc section.
Thanks to Ulrich Weigand for running down where the fix was needed.
llvm-svn: 230801
Summary:
Until now, we did this (among other things) based on whether or not the
target was Windows. This is clearly wrong, not just for Win64 ABI functions
on non-Windows, but for System V ABI functions on Windows, too. In this
change, we make this decision based on the ABI the calling convention
specifies instead.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7953
llvm-svn: 230793
When using Altivec, we can use vector loads and stores for aligned memcpy and
friends. Starting with the P7 and VXS, we have reasonable unaligned vector
stores. Starting with the P8, we have fast unaligned loads too.
For QPX, we use vector loads are stores, but only for aligned memory accesses.
llvm-svn: 230788
vectors. This lets us fix the rest of the v16 lowering problems when
pshufb is clearly better.
We might still be able to improve some of the lowerings by enabling the
other combine-based rewriting to fire for non-128-bit vectors, but this
at least should remove any regressions from using the fancy v16i16
lowering strategy.
llvm-svn: 230753
repeated 128-bit lane shuffles of wider vector types and use it to lower
256-bit v16i16 vector shuffles where applicable.
This should let us perfectly lowering the pattern of pshuflw and pshufhw
even for AVX2 256-bit patterns.
I've not added AVX-512 support, but it should be trivial for someone
working on that to wire up.
Note that currently this generates bad, long shuffle chains because we
don't combine 256-bit target shuffles. The subsequent patches will fix
that.
llvm-svn: 230751
Summary:
We identify the cases where the operand to an ADDE node is a constant
zero. In such cases, we can avoid generating an extra ADDu instruction
disguised as an identity move alias (ie. addu $r, $r, 0 --> move $r, $r).
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7906
llvm-svn: 230742
Summary:
This change causes us to actually save non-volatile registers in a Win64
ABI function that calls a System V ABI function, and vice-versa.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7919
llvm-svn: 230714
uses of TM->getSubtargetImpl and propagate to all calls.
This could be a debugging regression in places where we had a
TargetMachine and/or MachineFunction but don't have it as part
of the MachineInstr. Fixing this would require passing a
MachineFunction/Function down through the print operator, but
none of the existing uses in tree seem to do this.
llvm-svn: 230710
a lookup, pass that in rather than use a naked call to getSubtargetImpl.
This involved passing down and around either a TargetMachine or
TargetRegisterInfo. Update all callers/definitions around the targets
and SelectionDAG.
llvm-svn: 230699
blend as legal.
We made the same mistake in two different places. Whenever we are custom
lowering a v32i8 blend we need to check whether we are custom lowering
it only for constant conditions that can be shuffled, or whether we
actually have AVX2 and full dynamic blending support on bytes. Both are
fixed, with comments added to make it clear what is going on and a new
test case.
llvm-svn: 230695
dynamic blends.
This makes it much more clear what is going on. The case we're handling
is that of dynamic conditions, and we're bailing when the nature of the
vector types and subtarget preclude lowering the dynamic condition
vselect as an actual blend.
No functionality changed here, but this will make a subsequent bug-fix
to this code much more clear.
llvm-svn: 230690
Eric Christopher