Use it to safely handle less-than-or-equals-to exit conditions in loops. These
also occur when the loop exit branch is exit on true because SCEV inverses the
icmp predicate.
Use it again to handle non-zero strides, but only with an unsigned comparison
in the exit condition.
llvm-svn: 59528
If this patch causes a performance regression for anyone, please let me know,
and it can be fixed in a different way with much more effort.
llvm-svn: 59384
- Recognize expressions like "x > -1 ? x : 0" as min/max and turn them
into expressions like "x < 0 ? 0 : x", which is easily recognizable
as a min/max operation.
- Refrain from folding expression like "y/2 < 1" to "y < 2" when the
comparison is being used as part of a min or max idiom, like
"y/2 < 1 ? 1 : y/2". In that case, the division has another use, so
folding doesn't eliminate it, and obfuscates the min/max, making it
harder to recognize as a min/max operation.
These benefit ScalarEvolution, CodeGen, and anything else that wants to
recognize integer min and max.
llvm-svn: 56246
its callers to emit a space character before calling it when a
space is needed.
This fixes several spurious whitespace issues in
ScalarEvolution's debug dumps. See the test changes for
examples.
This also fixes odd space-after-tab indentation in the output
for switch statements, and changes calls from being printed like
this:
call void @foo( i32 %x )
to this:
call void @foo(i32 %x)
llvm-svn: 56196
continue past the first conditional branch when looking for a
relevant test. This helps it avoid using MAX expressions in
loop trip counts in more cases.
llvm-svn: 54697
version uses a new algorithm for evaluating the binomial coefficients
which is significantly more efficient for AddRecs of more than 2 terms
(see the comments in the code for details on how the algorithm works).
It also fixes some bugs: it removes the arbitrary length restriction for
AddRecs, it fixes the silent generation of incorrect code for AddRecs
which require a wide calculation width, and it fixes an issue where we
were incorrectly truncating the iteration count too far when evaluating
an AddRec expression narrower than the induction variable.
There are still a few related issues I know of: I think there's
still an issue with the SCEVExpander expansion of AddRec in terms of
the width of the induction variable used. The hack to avoid generating
too-wide integers shouldn't be necessary; instead, the callers should be
considering the cost of the expansion before expanding it (in addition
to not expanding too-wide integers, we might not want to expand
expressions that are really expensive, especially when optimizing for
size; calculating an length-17 32-bit AddRec currently generates about 250
instructions of straight-line code on X86). Also, for long 32-bit
AddRecs on X86, CodeGen really sucks at scheduling the code. I'm planning on
filing follow-up PRs for these issues.
llvm-svn: 54332
time applying to the implicit comparison in smin expressions. The
correct way to transform an inequality into the opposite
inequality, either signed or unsigned, is with a not expression.
I looked through the SCEV code, and I don't think there are any more
occurrences of this issue.
llvm-svn: 54194
SGT exit condition. Essentially, the correct way to flip an inequality
in 2's complement is the not operator, not the negation operator.
That said, the difference only affects cases involving INT_MIN.
Also, enhance the pre-test search logic to be a bit smarter about
inequalities flipped with a not operator, so it can eliminate the smax
from the iteration count for simple loops.
llvm-svn: 54184
bail after 256-bits to avoid producing code that the backends can't handle.
Previously, we capped it at 64-bits, preferring to miscompile in those cases.
This change also reverts much of r52248 because the invariants the code was
expecting are now being met.
llvm-svn: 53812
with code that was expecting different bit widths for different values.
Make getTruncateOrZeroExtend a method on ScalarEvolution, and use it.
llvm-svn: 52248
manually performing the comparison. This allows the special
case to work correctly even in the case where someone is
experimenting with a different comparison function :-).
llvm-svn: 49670
Nick Lewycky