expressions to have complete return types (or accessible destructors). If the
return type is required to be complete for some other reason (for instance, if
it is needed by overload resolution), then it will still be required to be
complete. This is apparently required in order to parse a MSVC11 header.
llvm-svn: 160924
Also, fix a subtle bug, which occurred due to lookupPrivateMethod
defined in DeclObjC.h not looking up the method inside parent's
categories.
Note, the code assumes that Class's parent object has the same methods
as what's in the Root class of a the hierarchy, which is a heuristic
that might not hold for hierarchies which do not descend from NSObject.
Would be great to fix this in the future.
llvm-svn: 160885
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
Rather than adding a ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack bit to essentially every
AST node, we tunnel the bit directly up to the surrounding lambda expression
when we reach a context where an unexpanded pack can not normally appear.
Thus any statement or declaration within a lambda can now potentially contain
an unexpanded parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 160705
A warning was added in r150128 for returning non-C compatible
user-defined types from functions with C linkage.
This makes the text more clear for the case when the type isn't
decidedly non-C compatible, but incomplete.
llvm-svn: 160681
variables that have static storage duration, it removes debug info on the
emitted initializer function but not all debug info about this variable.
llvm-svn: 160659
Make handler functions for thread safety attributes consistent with other attributes handler functions
by removing the bool parameter from some of the thread safety attributes handler functions and extracting
common checks out of different handler functions.
llvm-svn: 160635
structor class under ARC, that struct/class does not have a trivial
move constructor or move assignment operator. Fixes the rest of
<rdar://problem/11738725>.
llvm-svn: 160615
change once it's been assigned. It can change in two ways:
1) In a template instantiation, the context declaration should be the
instantiated declaration, not the declaration in the template.
2) If a lambda appears in the pattern of a variadic pack expansion, the
mangling number will depend on the pack length.
llvm-svn: 160614
While we still want to consider this a hard error (non-POD variadic args are
normally a DefaultError warning), delaying the diagnostic allows us to give
better error messages, which also match the usual non-POD errors more closely.
In addition, this change improves the diagnostic messages for format string
argument type mismatches by passing down the type of the callee, so we can
say "variadic method" or "variadic function" appropriately.
<rdar://problem/11825593>
llvm-svn: 160517
Previously, we would ask for the SourceLocation of an argument even if
it were NULL (i.e. if Sema resulted in an ExprError trying to build it).
<rdar://problem/11890818>
llvm-svn: 160515
Panzer. I've not been able to trigger a failure caused by this, so no test yet.
Also included is a small change from Paul Robinson to only consider the
FailureKind if the overload candidate did actually fail.
llvm-svn: 160470
be defined as deleted, take cv-qualifiers on class members into account when
looking up the copy or move constructor or assignment operator which will be
used for them.
llvm-svn: 160418
and a function template instantiation, if there's a parameter pack in the
declaration and one at the same place in the instantiation, don't assume that
the pack wasn't expanded -- it may have expanded to nothing. Instead, go ahead
and check whether the parameter pack was expandable. We can do this as a
side-effect of the work we'd need to do anyway, to find how many parameters
were produced.
llvm-svn: 160416
[temp.deduct.call]p4 under Objective-C++ ARC, make sure to adjust the
qualifiers to introduce the implicit strong lifetime when
needed. Fixes <rdar://problem/11825671>.
llvm-svn: 160412
Checks against nil often appear as guards in macros, and comparing
Objective-C literals to nil has well-defined behavior (if tautological).
On OS X, 'nil' has not been typed as 'id' since 10.6 (possibly earlier),
so the warning was already not firing, but other runtimes continue to use
((id)0) or some variant. This change accepts comparisons to any null pointer;
to keep it simple, it looks through all casts (not just casts to 'id').
PR13276
llvm-svn: 160379
Suggested by Ted, since string literal comparison is at least slightly more
sensible than comparison of runtime literals. (Ambiguous language on
developer.apple.com implies that strings are guaranteed to be uniqued within
a translation unit and possibly across a linked binary.)
llvm-svn: 160378
Recovering as if the user had actually called -isEqual: is a bit too far from
the semantics of the program as written, /even though/ it's probably what they
intended.
llvm-svn: 160377
* Treat compound assignment as a use, at Jordy's request.
* Always add compound assignments into the CFG, so we can correctly diagnose the use in 'return x += 1;'
llvm-svn: 160334
as an array of its base class TemplateArgument. Switch the const
TemplateArgument* parameters of InstantiatingTemplate's constructors to
ArrayRef<TemplateArgument> to prevent this from happening again in the future.
llvm-svn: 160245
struct __attribute__((visibility("hidden"))) zed {
};
struct __attribute__((visibility("hidden"))) zed;
Which is a bit silly and got a lot noisier now that we correctly handle
visibility pragmas. This patch fixes that and also has some extra quality
improvements:
* We now produce an error instead of a warning for
struct __attribute__((visibility("hidden"))) zed {
};
struct __attribute__((visibility("default"))) zed;
* The "after definition" warning now points to the new attribute that is
ignored instead of pointing to the declaration.
llvm-svn: 160227
Benjamin Kramer