Current LLDB (that is without DWZ support) crashes accessing Fedora debug info:
READ of size 8 at 0x60200000ffc8 thread T0
#0 in DWARFDebugInfoEntry::BuildAddressRangeTable(SymbolFileDWARF*, DWARFCompileUnit const*, DWARFDebugAranges*) const tools/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFDebugInfoEntry.cpp:1336
Greg Clayton: We will need a warning to be emitted in
SymbolFileDWARF::CalculateAbilities() stating we won't parse the DWARF due to
"unsupported DW_FORM value of 0x1f20".
Patch has been mostly written by Greg Clayton.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35622
llvm-svn: 309581
Summary:
Clang recently started to emit base address entries into the
.debug_ranges section to reduce the number of relocations needed. Lets
make sure LLDB can read them.
llvm-svn: 309554
This reapplies https://reviews.llvm.org/D35740 with a tweak to find
the section by name rather than type. Section types don't distinguish
between regular sections and their DWO counterparts.
llvm-svn: 308905
The DWO handling code can get confused by clang modules which also use
skeleton CUs to point to the object file with the full debug
info. This patch detects whether an object is a "real" DWO or a clang
module and prevents LLDB from interpreting clang modules as DWO. This
fixes the regression in TestWithModuleDebugging.
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=33875
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35740
llvm-svn: 308850
Cast to `const uint8_t *` instead of `uint8_t *` to avoid the warning
from GCC.
EmulationStateARM.cpp:206:34: warning: cast from type 'const void*' to type 'uint8_t* {aka unsigned char*}' casts away qualifiers [-Wcast-qual]
Cast to `const uint32_t *` and the explicitly cast away the const-ness
of the value. This seems pretty sketchy as the `DataExtractor` holds a
const reference to the data. However, this is no worse than before.
ObjectFilePECOFF.cpp:540:78: warning: cast from type 'const uint8_t* {aka const unsigned char*}' to type 'uint32_t* {aka unsigned int*}' casts away qualifiers [-Wcast-qual]
llvm-svn: 308489
Summary:
It defined a couple of types (condition_t) which we don't use anymore,
as we have c++11 goodies now. I remove these definitions.
Also it unnecessarily included a couple of headers which weren't
necessary for it's operation. I remove these, and place the includes in
the relevant files (usually .cpp, usually in Host code) which use them.
This allows us to reduce namespace pollution in most of the lldb files
which don't need the OS-specific definitions.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham
Subscribers: ki.stfu, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35113
llvm-svn: 308304
Summary:
The usage of shared_from_this forces us to separate construction and
initialization phases, because shared_from_this() is not available in
the constructor (or destructor). The shared semantics are not necessary,
as we always have a clear owner of the native process class
(GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLDB object). Even if we need shared
semantics in the future (which I think we should strongly avoid),
reverting this will not be necessary -- the owners can still easily
store the native process object in a shared pointer if they really want
to -- this just prevents the knowledge of that from leaking into the
class implementation.
After this a NativeThread object will hold a reference to the parent
process (instead of a weak_ptr) -- having a process instance always
available allows us to simplify some logic in this class (some of it was
already simplified because we were asserting that the process is
available, but this makes it obvious).
Reviewers: krytarowski, eugene, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35123
llvm-svn: 308282
Summary:
This patch adds support for sending strings along with
error codes in the reply packets. The implementation is
based on the feedback recieved in the lldb-dev mailing
list. The patch also adds an extra packet for the client
to query if the server has the capability to provide
strings along with error replys.
Reviewers: labath, jingham, sas, lldb-commits, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34945
llvm-svn: 307768
Summary:
Testing the value of type_code against the closed enum TypeCodes
provides statically verifiable completeness of testing. However, one
branch assigns to type_code by casting directly from a masked integer
value. This is currently handled by adding a default: case after
checking each TypeCodes instance. This patch introduces a bool variable
containing the "default" state value, allowing the switch to be
exhaustive, protect against future instances not being handled in the
switch, and preserves the original logic.
This addresses the warning:
warning: default label in switch which covers all enumeration values
[-Wcovered-switch-default]
As an issue of maintainability, the bitmask on line 524 handles the
current values of TypeCodes enum, but this will be invalid if the enum
is extended. This patch does not address this, and a more closed
conversion from cfinfoa -> TypeCodes would help protect against this.
Reviewers: spyffe, lhames, sas
Reviewed By: sas
Subscribers: sas, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35036
llvm-svn: 307712
In NativeProcessLinux::MonitorSIGTRAP we were asserting that the si_code
value is one of the codes we know about. However, that list was very
incomplete -- for example, we were not handling SI_TKILL/SI_USER,
generated by raise(SIGTRAP). A cursory examination show there are at
least a dozen codes like these that an app can generate, and more can be
added at any point.
So, instead of trying to play catchup, I change the default behavior to
treat an unknown si_code like an ordinary signal. The only reason we
needed to inspect si_code in the first place is because
watchpoint/breakpoints are notified as SIGTRAP, but we already know
about those, and us starting to use a new debug event is far less likely
than somebody introducing a new non-debug event.
I add a test case to TestRaise to verify we are handling raise(SIGTRAP)
in an application properly.
llvm-svn: 307644
Summary:
On linux on ppc64le some of the enums in AuxVector have the same name
as macros defined in the system.
Reviewers: mikesart, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: joerg, gut, krytarowski, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35065
Patch by Bruno Rosa <bruno.rosa@eldorado.org.br>
llvm-svn: 307632
blocks of memory, and if the final bytes of that block look like a long
x86 instruction, it can cause the llvm disassembler to read past the end
of the buffer. Use the maximum allowed instruction length that we pass
to the llvm disassembler as a way to limit this to the size of the buffer.
An example of how to trigger this is when lldb does a function call, it
puts a breakpoint on the beginning of main() and uses that as the return
address from the function call. When we stop at that location, lldb may
try to find the first frame up the stack. Because this is on the first
instruction of a function, it will get the word-size value at the stack
pointer and assume that this was the caller's pc value. But this is random
stack memory and could point to anything - an object in memory, something
in the data section, whatever. And if we have a symbol for that thing,
we'll try to disassemble it.
This was leading to infrequent crashes in customer scenarios; figured out
what was happening with address sanitizer.
<rdar://problem/30463256>
llvm-svn: 307454
Summary:
This replaces the static functions used for creating
NativeProcessProtocol instances with a factory pattern, and modernizes
the interface of the new class in the process -- I use llvm::Expected
instead of the Status+value combo. I also move some of the common code
(like the Delegate registration into the base class). The new
arrangement has multiple benefits:
- it removes the NativeProcess*** dependency from Process/gdb-remote
(which for example means that liblldb no longer pulls in this code).
- it enables unit testing of the GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS class
(by providing a mock Native Process).
- serves as another example on how to use the llvm::Expected class (I
couldn't get rid of the Initialize-type functions completely here
because of the use of shared_from_this, but that's the next thing on
my list here)
Tests still pass on Linux and I've made sure NetBSD compiles after this.
Reviewers: zturner, eugene, krytarowski
Subscribers: srhines, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33778
llvm-svn: 307390
Summary:
On older android targets, we needed a dlopen rename workaround to get
"process load" working. Since API 26 this is not required as the targets
have a proper libdl so with the function names one would expect.
To make this work I've had to remove the const qualifier from the
GetLibdlFunctionDeclarations function (as now the declarations can
depend on the connected target). Since I was already modifying the
prototype (and the lower levels were already converted to StringRef) I
took the oportunity to convert this function as well.
llvm-svn: 307160
Summary:
The std::move was preventing copy ellision when compiled with
clang, the patch fixes the warning along with rearranging code
to remove unused variables warnings on Linux machines with
older perf_event interface.
Reviewers: labath, ted
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34946
llvm-svn: 307030
NSSetM has two in-memory representations depending on what Foundation version is in use.
This patch separates the two.
rdar://33057292
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34821
llvm-svn: 306773
Summary:
The classes have no dependencies, and they are used both by lldb and
lldb-server, so it makes sense for them to live in the lowest layers.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34746
llvm-svn: 306682
Summary:
The instruction pattern:
and $-16, %esp
sub $imm, %esp
...
lea imm(%ebp), %esp
appears when the compiler is realigning the stack (for example in
main(), or almost everywhere with -mstackrealign switch). The "and"
instruction is very difficult to model, but that's not necessary, as
these frames are always %ebp-based (the compiler also needs a way to
restore the original %esp). Therefore the plans we were generating for
these function were almost correct already. The only place we were doing
it wrong were the last instructions of the epilogue (usually just
"ret"), where we had to revert to %esp-based unwinding, as the %ebp had
been popped already.
This was wrong because our "distance of esp from cfa" counter had picked
up the "sub" instruction (and incremented the counter) but it had not
seen that the register was reset by the "lea" instruction.
This patch fixes that shortcoming, and adds a test for handling
functions like this.
I have not been able to tickle the compiler into producing a 64-bit
function with this pattern, but I don't see a reason why it couldn't
produce it, if it chose to, so I add a x86_64 test as well.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34750
llvm-svn: 306666
some methods in the ABI need a Process to do their work.
Instead of passing it in as a one-off argument to those
methods, this patch puts it in the base class and the methods
can retrieve if it needed.
Note that ABI's are sometimes built without a Process
(e.g. SBTarget::GetStackRedZoneSize) so it's entirely
possible that the process weak pointer will not be
able to reconsistitue into a strong pointer.
<rdar://problem/32526754>
llvm-svn: 306633
Summary:
instead of using a boolean to differentiate between the two section
types, use an enum to make the intent clearer.
I also remove the RegisterKind argument from the constructor, as this
can be deduced from the Type argument.
Reviewers: clayborg, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34681
llvm-svn: 306521
Summary:
This patch implements support for Intel(R) Processor Trace
in lldb server. The changes have support for
starting/stopping and reading the trace data. The code
is only available on Linux versions where the perf
attributes for aux buffers are available.
The patch also consists of Unit tests for testing the
core buffer reading function.
Reviewers: lldb-commits, labath, clayborg, zturner, tberghammer
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33674
llvm-svn: 306516
Summary:
It had a dependency on StringConvert and file reading code, which is not
in Utility. I've replaced that code by equivalent llvm operations.
I've added a unit test to demonstrate that parsing a file still works.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham
Subscribers: kubamracek, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34625
llvm-svn: 306394
Summary:
The new UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer plugin was breaking file path length
limits, because it's (fairly long name) appears multiple times in the
path. Cmake ends up putting the object file at path
tools/lldb/source/Plugins/InstrumentationRuntime/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer/CMakeFiles/lldbPluginInstrumentationRuntimeUndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.dir/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizerRuntime.cpp.obj
which is 191 characters long and very dangerously close to the 260
character path limit on windows systems (also, just the include line for
that file was breaking the 80 character line limit).
This renames the sanitizer plugins to use shorter names (asan, ubsan,
tsan). I think this will still be quite understandable to everyone as
those are the names everyone uses to refer to them anyway.
Reviewers: zturner, kubamracek, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34553
llvm-svn: 306278
Summary: Reported by coverity, I don't know how to provide a test.
Reviewers: zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits, emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34550
llvm-svn: 306134
Summary:
This is basically a revert of D16107 and parts of D10800, which were
trying to get vdso loading working. They did this by implementing a
generic load-an-elf-file from memory approach, which is not correct,
since we cannot assume that an elf file is loaded in memory in full (it
usually isn't, as there's no need to load section headers for example).
This meant that we would read garbage instead of section sizes, and if
that garbage happened to be a large number, we would crash while trying
to allocate a buffer to accomodate the hypothetical section.
Instead of this, I add a bit of custom code to load the vdso to
DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD (which already needed to handle the vdso
specially). I determine the size of the memory to read using
Process::GetMemoryRegionInfo, which is information coming from the OS,
and cannot be forged by a malicious/misbehaving application.
Reviewers: eugene, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, ravitheja, tberghammer, emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34352
llvm-svn: 305780
Summary:
A number of places were trying to decode the result of wait(). Add a simple
utility function that does that and a struct that encapsulates the
decoded result. Then also provide a pretty-printer for that class.
Reviewers: zturner, krytarowski, eugene
Subscribers: lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33998
llvm-svn: 305689
Summary:
The motivation for this is to make sure the first row of the plan
compares equal to the first row of a generic debug_frame unwind plan.
Right now, the code in FuncUnwinders::GetUnwindPlanAtNonCallSite
considers them unequal because they specify the return address in a
different way (SetReturnAddressRegister(LR) vs. an explicit PC=LR rule).
This means that FuncUnwinders would always choose the debug_frame unwind
plan, which is not correct, as that one is usually not correct at all
locations.
Right now this is basically a noop because we don't have parse any
debug_frame plans, but it fixes some test failures when merging D33504
in.
I have to say I don't understand the full implications of the switch to
SetReturnAddressRegister() way of doing things, but given that all of
our other unwind plans (eh_frame, instruction profiling) do it this way,
it sounds like the right thing to do.
Reviewers: tberghammer, jasonmolenda, omjavaid
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34199
llvm-svn: 305687
Jan Kratochvil