warnings (warning or lack there of) as well since
blocks are another pattern for envoking other
designated initializers. // rdar://16323233
llvm-svn: 204081
In instrumentation-based profiling, we need a set of data structures to
represent the counters. Previously, these were built up during static
initialization. Now, they're shoved into a specially-named section so
that they show up as an array.
As a consequence of the reorganizing symbols, instrumentation data
structures for linkonce functions are now correctly coalesced.
This is the first step in a larger project to minimize runtime overhead
and dependencies in instrumentation-based profilng. The larger picture
includes removing all initialization overhead and making the dependency
on libc optional.
<rdar://problem/15943240>
llvm-svn: 204080
What's going on in the test case (without the patch applied) is this:
When the header is parsed, decltype(B()) is canonicalized to decltype(Y()),
because that was the first parsed equivalent decltype expression. Hence, the
TemplateSpecializationType for Id<decltype(B())> ends up with
SubstTemplateTypeParmType(T, decltype(Y())) as the AliasedType member.
When the PCH file is included and the AST reader reads Id<decltype(B())>, it
sees decltype(B()) before decltype(Y()). So, this time decltype(B()) ends up
being the canonical type for both decltypes, which leads to an assert violation
when the reader calls getSubstTemplateTypeParmType with the non-canonical
decltype(Y()) as the replacement type.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3073
llvm-svn: 204005
Also relax unreachable 'break' and 'return' to not check for being
preceded by a call to 'noreturn'. That turns out to not be so
interesting in practice.
llvm-svn: 204000
Recent work on -Wunreachable-code has focused on suppressing uninteresting
unreachable code that center around "configuration values", but
there are still some set of cases that are sometimes interesting
or uninteresting depending on the codebase. For example, a dead
"break" statement may not be interesting for a particular codebase,
potentially because it is auto-generated or simply because code
is written defensively.
To address these workflow differences, -Wunreachable-code is now
broken into several diagnostic groups:
-Wunreachable-code: intended to be a reasonable "default" for
most users.
and then other groups that turn on more aggressive checking:
-Wunreachable-code-break: warn about dead break statements
-Wunreachable-code-trivial-return: warn about dead return statements
that return "trivial" values (e.g., return 0). Other return
statements that return non-trivial values are still reported
under -Wunreachable-code (this is an area subject to more refinement).
-Wunreachable-code-aggressive: supergroup that enables all these
groups.
The goal is to eventually make -Wunreachable-code good enough to
either be in -Wall or on-by-default, thus finessing these warnings
into different groups helps achieve maximum signal for more users.
TODO: the tests need to be updated to reflect this extra control
via diagnostic flags.
llvm-svn: 203994
'init' methods which are unavailable. Subclasses of NSObject
have to implement such methods as a common pattern to prevent
user's own implementation. // rdar://16305460
llvm-svn: 203984
complete. We hook into this check from a couple of other places (modules,
debug info) so it's not OK to elide the check if the type was already
complete.
llvm-svn: 203978
(for an integer too large for any signed type) from Warning to ExtWarn -- it's
ill-formed in C++11 and C99 onwards, and UB during translation in C89 and
C++98. Add diagnostic groups for two relevant diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 203974
'init' methods which are unavailable. Subclasses of NSObject
have to implement such methods as a common pattern to prevent
user's own implementation. // rdar://16305460
llvm-svn: 203966
* Explicitly say that we conform to the two N/A bullets that required no
compiler changes.
* Remove a library feature from our features list.
llvm-svn: 203964
Summary:
Gracefully fail to evaluate a constant expression if its type is
unknown, rather than failing an assertion trying to access the type.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: chandlerc, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3075
llvm-svn: 203950
Richard Smith