Without this fix cancellation status for parallel, sections and for persists
across construct boundaries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31419
llvm-svn: 299434
Fix other cases of 'const StringRef' creeping back in at the same time.
This should fix the llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win buildbot.
llvm-svn: 299433
This patch is a part one of two reviews, one for the clang and the other for LLVM.
The patch deletes the back-end intrinsics and adds support for them in the auto upgrade.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31393
llvm-svn: 299432
This patch is a part two of two reviews, one for the clang and the other for LLVM.
In this patch, I covered the clang side, by introducing the intrinsic to the front end.
This is done by creating a generic replacement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31394a
llvm-svn: 299431
Summary:
Lift the restrictions that prevented the tree walking introduced in the
previous change and add support for patterns like:
(G_ADD (G_MUL (G_SEXT $src1), (G_SEXT $src2)), $src3) -> SMADDWrrr $dst, $src1, $src2, $src3
Also adds support for G_SEXT and G_ZEXT to support these cases.
One particular aspect of this that I should draw attention to is that I've
tried to be overly conservative in determining the safety of matches that
involve non-adjacent instructions and multiple basic blocks. This is intended
to be used as a cheap initial check and we may add a more expensive check in
the future. The current rules are:
* Reject if any instruction may load/store (we'd need to check for intervening
memory operations.
* Reject if any instruction has implicit operands.
* Reject if any instruction has unmodelled side-effects.
See isObviouslySafeToFold().
Reviewers: t.p.northover, javed.absar, qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, ab, rovka
Reviewed By: ab
Subscribers: igorb, dberris, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30539
llvm-svn: 299430
= Change of WAR, WAW generation: =
- `buildFlow(Sink, MustSource, MaySource, Sink)` treates any flow of the form
`sink <- may source <- must source` as a *may* dependence.
- we used to call:
```lang=cpp, name=old-flow-call.cpp
Flow = buildFlow(MustWrite, MustWrite, Read, Schedule);
WAW = isl_union_flow_get_must_dependence(Flow);
WAR = isl_union_flow_get_may_dependence(Flow);
```
- This caused some WAW dependences to be treated as WAR dependences.
- Incorrect semantics.
- Now, we call WAR and WAW correctly.
== Correct WAW: ==
```lang=cpp, name=new-waw-call.cpp
Flow = buildFlow(Write, MustWrite, MayWrite, Schedule);
WAW = isl_union_flow_get_may_dependence(Flow);
isl_union_flow_free(Flow);
```
== Correct WAR: ==
```lang=cpp, name=new-war-call.cpp
Flow = buildFlow(Write, Read, MustaWrite, Schedule);
WAR = isl_union_flow_get_must_dependence(Flow);
isl_union_flow_free(Flow);
```
- We want the "shortest" WAR possible (exact dependences).
- We mark all the *must-writes* as may-source, reads as must-souce.
- Then, we ask for *must* dependence.
- This removes all the reads that flow through a *must-write*
before reaching a sink.
- Note that we only block ealier writes with *must-writes*. This is
intuitively correct, as we do not want may-writes to block
must-writes.
- Leaves us with direct (R -> W).
- This affects reduction generation since RED is built using WAW and WAR.
= New StrictWAW for Reductions: =
- We used to call:
```lang=cpp,name=old-waw-war-call.cpp
Flow = buildFlow(MustWrite, MustWrite, Read, Schedule);
WAW = isl_union_flow_get_must_dependence(Flow);
WAR = isl_union_flow_get_may_dependence(Flow);
```
- This *is* the right model of WAW we need for reductions, just not in general.
- Reductions need to track only *strict* WAW, without any interfering reductions.
= Explanation: Why the new WAR dependences in tests are correct: =
- We no longer set WAR = WAR - WAW
- Hence, we will have WAR dependences that were originally removed.
- These may look incorrect, but in fact make sense.
== Code: ==
```lang=llvm, name=new-war-dependence.ll
; void manyreductions(long *A) {
; for (long i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
; for (long j = 0; j < 1024; j++)
; S0: *A += 42;
;
; for (long i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
; for (long j = 0; j < 1024; j++)
; S1: *A += 42;
;
```
=== WAR dependence: ===
{ S0[1023, 1023] -> S1[0, 0] }
- Between `S0[1023, 1023]` and `S1[0, 0]`, we will have the dependences:
```lang=cpp, name=dependence-incorrect, counterexample
S0[1023, 1023]:
*-- tmp = *A (load0)--*
WAR 2 add = tmp + 42 |
*-> *A = add (store0) |
WAR 1
S1[0, 0]: |
tmp = *A (load1) |
add = tmp + 42 |
A = add (store1)<-*
```
- One may assume that WAR2 *hides* WAR1 (since store0 happens before
store1). However, within a statement, Polly has no idea about the
ordering of loads and stores.
- Hence, according to Polly, the code may have looked like this:
```lang=cpp, name=dependence-correct
S0[1023, 1023]:
A = add (store0)
tmp = A (load0) ---*
add = A + 42 |
WAR 1
S1[0, 0]: |
tmp = A (load1) |
add = A + 42 |
A = add (store1) <-*
```
- So, Polly generates (correct) WAR dependences. It does not make sense
to remove these dependences, since they are correct with respect to
Polly's model.
Reviewers: grosser, Meinersbur
tags: #polly
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31386
llvm-svn: 299429
This patch teaches the hazard scheduler how to handle empty blocks
when search for the next real instruction when dealing with forbidden
slots.
Reviewers: slthakur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31293
llvm-svn: 299427
PSADBW pattern currently supports the 32 bit IR pattern and only GLT (greather than) comparison.
The patch extends the pattern to catch also 64 bit IR pattern and includes all other comparison types (not only GLT).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31577
llvm-svn: 299425
Summary:
A couple of the utilities used to analyze or build IR make explicit use of the legacy PM on their interface, to access analysis results. This patch removes the legacy PM from the interface, and just passes the required results directly.
This shouldn't introduce any function changes, although the API technically allowed to obtain two different analysis results before, one passed by reference and one through the PM. I don't believe that was ever intended, however.
Reviewers: grosser, Meinersbur
Reviewed By: grosser
Subscribers: nemanjai, pollydev, llvm-commits
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31653
llvm-svn: 299423
As with the changes made in r297645, we do not want a potentially long link to
be run, if it will ultimately fail because the map file is not writable. This
change reuses the same functionality as the output file path check. See
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30449 for further justification and explanations.
Reviewers: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31603
llvm-svn: 299420
Summary:
The patch adds a new feature for renaming qualified symbol references.
Unlike orginal clang-rename behavior, when renaming a qualified symbol to a new
qualified symbol (e.g "A::Foo" => "B::Bar"), this new rename behavior will
consider the prefix qualifiers of the symbol, and calculate the new prefix
qualifiers. It aims to add as few additional qualifiers as possible.
As this is an early version (only supports renaming classes), I don't change
current clang-rename interfaces at the moment, and would like to keep its
(command-line tool) behavior. So I added new interfaces for the prototype.
In the long run, these interfaces should be unified.
No functionality changes in original clang-rename command-line tool.
This patch also contains a few bug fixes of clang-rename which are discovered by
the new unittest:
* fix a potential nullptr accessment when class declaration doesn't have definition.
* add USRs of nested declartaions in "getNamedDeclFor".
Reviewers: ioeric
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31176
llvm-svn: 299419
The existing names for the ARM and Thumb Thunks highlight their current
use as interworking Thunks. These Thunks can also be used for range
extension Thunks where there is no state change. This change makes the name
more generic so it is suitable for range extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31605
llvm-svn: 299418
Otherwise, yamlize in YAMLTraits.h might be wrongly defined.
This makes some AMDGPU tests fail when LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30508
llvm-svn: 299415
look showed that the target's arch has no core / byte order and so when
AuxVector::AuxVector calls into a dataextractor and sets the byte size to 0,
it asserts. e.g.
m_arch = {
m_triple = (Data = "x86_64--linux", Arch = x86_64, SubArch = NoSubArch, Vendor = UnknownVendor, OS = Linux, Environment = UnknownEnvironment, ObjectFormat = ELF)
m_core = kCore_invalid
m_byte_order = eByteOrderInvalid
m_flags = 0x00000000
m_distribution_id = <no value available>
}
<rdar://problem/31380097>
llvm-svn: 299408
Summary:
The TypeTableBuilder provides stable storage for type records. We don't
need to copy all of the bytes into a flat vector before adding it to the
TpiStreamBuilder.
This makes addTypeRecord take an ArrayRef<uint8_t> and a hash code to go
with it, which seems like a simplification.
Reviewers: ruiu, zturner, inglorion
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31634
llvm-svn: 299406
Summary:
MASM can produce type streams that are not topologically sorted. It can
even produce type streams with circular references, but those are not
common in practice.
Reviewers: inglorion, ruiu
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31629
llvm-svn: 299403
Summary:
Add a hook for simplification of shufflevector's with the following rules:
- Constant folding - NFC, as it was already being done by the default handler.
- If only one of the operands is constant, constant fold the shuffle if the
mask does not select elements from the variable operand - to show the hook is firing and affecting the test-cases.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, sanjoy, nlopes, majnemer
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31525
llvm-svn: 299393
Dont emit Mapping symbols for sections that contain only data.
Summary:
Dont emit mapping symbols for sections that contain only data.
Reviewers: rengolin, weimingz, kparzysz, t.p.northover, peter.smith
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Patched by Shankar Easwaran <shankare@codeaurora.org>
Subscribers: alekseyshl, t.p.northover, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30724
llvm-svn: 299392
Previous error message style:
error: /home/alice/src/bar.c:12: relocation R_X86_64_PLT32 cannot refer to absolute symbol 'answer' defined in /home/alice/src/foo.o
New error message style:
error: relocation R_X86_64_PLT32 cannot refer to absolute symbol: foo
>>> defined in /home/alice/src/foo.o
>>> referenced by bar.c:12 (/home/alice/src/bar.c:12)
>>> /home/alice/src/bar.o:(.text+0x1)
llvm-svn: 299390
It can be costly to transfer from the gprs to the xmm registers and can prevent loads merging.
This patch splits vXi16/vXi32/vXi64 BUILD_VECTORS that use the same operand in multiple elements into a BUILD_VECTOR with only a single insertion of each of those elements and then performs an unary shuffle to duplicate the values.
There are a couple of minor regressions this patch unearths due to some missing MOVDDUP/BROADCAST folds that I will address in a future patch.
Note: Now that vector shuffle lowering and combining is pretty good we should be reusing that instead of duplicating so much in LowerBUILD_VECTOR - this is the first of several patches to address this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31373
llvm-svn: 299387
It turns out that SimplifyDemandedInstructionBits will get called earlier and remove bits from C1 first. Effectively doing (X & (C1&C2)) | C2. So by the time it got to this check there could be no common bits.
I think the DAGCombiner has the same check but its check can be executed because it handles demanded bits later. I'll look at it next.
llvm-svn: 299384
The x86_64 ABI requires that the stack is 16 byte aligned on function calls. Thus, the 8-byte error code, which is pushed by the CPU for certain exceptions, leads to a misaligned stack. This results in bugs such as Bug 26413, where misaligned movaps instructions are generated.
This commit fixes the misalignment by adjusting the stack pointer in these cases. The adjustment is done at the beginning of the prologue generation by subtracting another 8 bytes from the stack pointer. These additional bytes are popped again in the function epilogue.
Fixes Bug 26413
Patch by Philipp Oppermann.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30049
llvm-svn: 299383
Summary:
Certain implicitly generated coroutine statements, such as the calls to 'return_value()' or `return_void()` or `get_return_object_on_allocation_failure()`, cannot be built until the promise type is no longer dependent. This means they are not built until after the coroutine body statement has been transformed.
This patch fixes an issue where these statements would never be built for coroutine templates.
It also fixes a small issue where diagnostics about `get_return_object_on_allocation_failure()` were incorrectly suppressed.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31487
llvm-svn: 299380
Olga Malysheva