We need to relax constraints on invariant loads so that they do not
create fake RAW dependences. So, we do not consider invariant loads as
scalar dependences in a region.
During these changes, it turned out that we do not consider `llvm::Value`
replacements correctly within `PPCGCodeGeneration` and `ISLNodeBuilder`.
The replacements dictated by `ValueMap` were not being followed in all
places. This was fixed in this commit. There is no clean way to decouple
this change because this bug only seems to arise when the relaxed
version of invariant load hoisting was enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35120
llvm-svn: 307907
This test fails, if polly is not linked into LLVM's tools. Our
lit site-config already deals with this by not adding the -load
option, if polly is linked into LLVM's tools.
llvm-svn: 306395
This reduces the compilation time of one reduced test case from Android from
16 seconds to 100 mseconds (we bail out), without negatively impacting any
other test case we currently have.
We still saw occasionally compilation timeouts on the AOSP buildbot. Hopefully,
those will go away with this change.
llvm-svn: 306235
r303971 added an assertion that SCEV addition involving an AddRec
and a SCEVUnknown must involve a dominance relation: either the
SCEVUnknown value dominates the AddRec's loop, or the AddRec's
loop header dominates the SCEVUnknown. This is generally fine
for most usage of SCEV because it isn't possible to write an
expression in IR which would violate it, but it's a bit inconvenient
here for polly.
To solve the issue, just avoid creating a SCEV expression which
triggers the asssertion.
I'm not really happy with this solution, but I don't have any better
ideas.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33464.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34259
llvm-svn: 305864
In r304074 we introduce a patch to accept results from side effect free
functions into SCEV modeling. This causes rejection of cases where the
call is happening outside the SCoP. This patch checks if the call is
outside the Region and treats the results as a parameter (SCEVType::PARAM)
to the SCoP instead of returning SCEVType::INVALID.
Patch by Sameer Abu Asal.
llvm-svn: 305423
Ignored intrinsics are ignored at code generation, therefore do not
need to be part of the instruction list.
Specifically, llvm.lifetime.* intrinisics are removed before code
generation, referencing them would cause a use-after-free error.
Contributed-by: Nandini Singhal <cs15mtech01004@iith.ac.in>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33768
llvm-svn: 304483
Such instructions are generates on-demand by the CodeGenerator and thus
do not need representation in a statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33642
llvm-svn: 304151
Certain affine memory accesses which we model today might contain products of
parameters which we might combined into a new parameter to be able to create an
affine expression that represents these memory accesses. Especially in the
context of OpenCL, this approach looses information as memory accesses such as
A[get_global_id(0) * N + get_global_id(1)] are assumed to be linear. We
correctly recover their multi-dimensional structure by assuming that parameters
that are the result of a function call at IR level likely are not parameters,
but indeed induction variables. The resulting access is now
A[get_global_id(0)][get_global_id(1)] for an array A[][N].
llvm-svn: 304075
Side-effect free function calls with only constant parameters can be easily
re-generated and consequently do not prevent us from modeling a SCEV. This
change allows array subscripts to reference function calls such as
'get_global_id()' as used in OpenCL.
We use the function name plus the constant operands to name the parameter. This
is possible as the function name is required and is not dropped in release
builds the same way names of llvm::Values are dropped. We also provide more
readable names for common OpenCL functions, to make it easy to understand the
polyhedral model we generate.
llvm-svn: 304074
Summary: This patch outputs all the list of instructions in BlockStmts.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, grosser, bollu
Subscribers: bollu, llvm-commits, pollydev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33163
llvm-svn: 304062
Summary:
My goal is to make the newly added `AllowWholeFunctions` options more usable/powerful.
The changes to ScopBuilder.cpp are exclusively checks to prevent `Region.getExit()` from being dereferenced, since Top Level Regions (TLRs) don't have an exit block.
In ScopDetection's `isValidCFG`, I removed a check that disallowed ReturnInstructions to have return values. This might of course have been intentional, so I would welcome your feedback on this and maybe a small explanation why return values are forbidden. Maybe it can be done but needs more changes elsewhere?
The remaining changes in ScopDetection are simply to consider the AllowWholeFunctions option in more places, i.e. allow TLRs when it is set and once again avoid derefererncing `getExit()` if it doesn't exist.
Finally, in ScopHelper.cpp I extended `polly::isErrorBlock` to handle regions without exit blocks as well: The original check was if a given BasicBlock dominates all predecessors of the exit block. Therefore I do the same for TLRs by regarding all BasicBlocks terminating with a ReturnInst as predecessors of a "virtual" function exit block.
Patch by: Lukas Boehm
Reviewers: philip.pfaffe, grosser, Meinersbur
Reviewed By: grosser
Subscribers: pollydev, llvm-commits, bollu
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33411
llvm-svn: 303790
This speeds up scop modeling for scops with many redundent existentially
quantified constraints. For the attached test case, this change reduces
scop modeling time from minutes (hours?) to 0.15 seconds.
This change resolves a compilation timeout on the AOSP build.
Thanks Eli for reporting _and_ reducing the test case!
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 303600
- We use the outermost dimension of arrays since we need this
information to generate GPU transfers.
- In general, if we do not know the outermost dimension of the array
(because the indexing expression is non-affine, for example) then we
simply cannot generate transfer code.
- However, for Fortran arrays, we can use the Fortran array
representation which stores the dimensions of all arrays.
- This patch uses the Fortran array representation to generate code that
computes the outermost dimension size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32967
llvm-svn: 303429
Summary:
- Rename global / local naming convention that did not make much sense
to Visible / Invisible, where the visible refers to whether the ALLOCATE
call to the Fortran array is present in the current module or not.
- This match now works on both cross fortran module globals and on
parameters to functions since neither of them are necessarily allocated
at the point of their usage.
- Add testcase that matches against both a load and a store against
function parameters.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33190
llvm-svn: 303356
- This breaks the previous assumption that Fortran Arrays are `GlobalValue`.
- The names of functions were getting unwieldy. So, I renamed the
Fortran related functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33075
llvm-svn: 303040
- Move the testcases to ScopInfo/ since the processing takes place in
ScopBuilder.
- Cleanup testcases, run -polly-canonicalize on them, find minimal set
of opt parameters.
llvm-svn: 302886
Summary:
In case two arrays share base pointers in the same invariant load equivalence
class, we canonicalize all memory accesses to the first of these arrays
(according to their order in the equivalence class).
This enables us to optimize kernels such as boost::ublas by ensuring that
different references to the C array are interpreted as accesses to the same
array. Before this change the runtime alias check for ublas would fail, as it
would assume models of the C array with differing (but identically valued) base
pointers would reference distinct regions of memory whereas the referenced
memory regions were indeed identical.
As part of this change we remove most of the MemoryAccess::get*BaseAddr
interface. We removed already all references to get*BaseAddr in previous
commits to ensure that no code relies on matching base pointers between
memory accesses and scop arrays -- except for three remaining uses where we
need the original base pointer. We document for these situations that
MemoryAccess::getOriginalBaseAddr may return a base pointer that is distinct
to the base pointer of the scop array referenced by this memory access.
Reviewers: sebpop, Meinersbur, zinob, gareevroman, pollydev, huihuiz, efriedma, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: etherzhhb
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28518
llvm-svn: 302636
SCoPs with unfeasible runtime context are thrown away and therefore
do not need their uses verified.
The added test case requires a complexity limit to exceed.
Normally, error statements are removed from the SCoP and for that
reason are skipped during the verification. If there is a unfeasible
runtime context (here: because of the complexity limit being reached),
the removal of error statements and other SCoP construction steps are
skipped to not waste time. Error statements are not modeled in SCoPs
and therefore have no requirements on whether the scalars used in
them are available.
llvm-svn: 302234
Since r294891, in MemoryAccess::computeBoundsOnAccessRelation(), we skip
manually bounding the access relation in case the parameter of the load
instruction is already a wrapped set. Later on we assume that the lower
bound on the set is always smaller or equal to the upper bound on the
set. Bug 32715 manages to construct a sign wrapped set, in which case
the assertion does not necessarily hold. Fix this by handling a sign
wrapped set similar to a normal wrapped set, that is skipping the
computation.
Contributed-by: Maximilian Falkenstein <falkensm@student.ethz.ch>
Reviewers: grosser
Subscribers: pollydev, llvm-commits
Tags: #Polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32893
llvm-svn: 302231
LLVM-IR names are commonly available in debug builds, but often not in release
builds. Hence, using LLVM-IR names to identify statements or memory reference
results makes the behavior of Polly depend on the compile mode. This is
undesirable. Hence, we now just number the statements instead of using LLVM-IR
names to identify them (this issue has previously been brought up by Zino
Benaissa).
However, as LLVM-IR names help in making test cases more readable, we add an
option '-polly-use-llvm-names' to still use LLVM-IR names. This flag is by
default set in the polly tests to make test cases more readable.
This change reduces the time in ScopInfo from 32 seconds to 2 seconds for the
following test case provided by Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org> (already
used in one of the previous commits):
struct X { int x; };
void a();
#define SIG (int x, X **y, X **z)
typedef void (*fn)SIG;
#define FN { for (int i = 0; i < x; ++i) { (*y)[i].x += (*z)[i].x; } a(); }
#define FN5 FN FN FN FN FN
#define FN25 FN5 FN5 FN5 FN5
#define FN125 FN25 FN25 FN25 FN25 FN25
#define FN250 FN125 FN125
#define FN1250 FN250 FN250 FN250 FN250 FN250
void x SIG { FN1250 }
For a larger benchmark I have on-hand (10000 loops), this reduces the time for
running -polly-scops from 5 minutes to 4 minutes, a reduction by 20%.
The reason for this large speedup is that our previous use of printAsOperand
had a quadratic cost, as for each printed and unnamed operand the full function
was scanned to find the instruction number that identifies the operand.
We do not need to adjust the way memory reference ids are constructured, as
they do not use LLVM values.
Reviewed by: efriedma
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32789
llvm-svn: 302072
This makes it easier to read and possibly even modify the test cases, as there
is no need to keep the variable increment in steps of one. More importantly, by
using explicit variable names we do not need to rely on the implicit numbering
of statements when dumping the scop information.
This makes it easier to read and possibly even modify the test cases.
Furthermore, by using explicit variables we do not need to rely on the implicit
numbering of statements when dumping the scop information. In a future commit,
this implicit numbering will likely not be used any more to refer to LLVM-IR
values as it is very expensive to construct.
llvm-svn: 301689
Trivial fix for two testcases. When Polly isn't linked into opt,
independent of whether it's built in-tree or not, these testcases forget
to load the appropriate library.
Contributed-by: Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31596
llvm-svn: 299357
In case LLVM pointers are annotated with !dereferencable attributes/metadata
or LLVM can look at the allocation from which a pointer is derived, we can know
that dereferencing pointers is safe and can be done unconditionally. We use this
information to proof certain pointers as save to hoist and then hoist them
unconditionally.
llvm-svn: 297375
Only when load-hoisted we can be sure the base pointer is invariant
during the SCoP's execution. Most of the time it would be added to
the required hoists for the alias checks anyway, except with
-polly-ignore-aliasing, -polly-use-runtime-alias-checks=0 or if
AliasAnalysis is already sure it doesn't alias with anything
(for instance if there is no other pointer to alias with).
Two more parts in Polly assume that this load-hoisting took place:
- setNewAccessRelation() which contains an assert which tests this.
- BlockGenerator which would use to the base ptr from the original
code if not load-hoisted (if the access expression is regenerated)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30694
llvm-svn: 297195
There is no point in optimizing unreachable code, hence our test cases should
always return.
This commit is part of a series that makes Polly more robust on the presence of
unreachables.
llvm-svn: 297158
These test cases should work in combination with
https://reviews.llvm.org/D12676, but became outdated over time. Update them
in preparation of discussions with Daniel Berlin on how to represent unreachable
in the post-dominator tree.
llvm-svn: 297157
There is no point in optimizing unreachable code, hence our test cases should
always return.
This commit is part of a series that makes Polly more robust on the presence of
unreachables.
llvm-svn: 297150
There is no point in optimizing unreachable code, hence our test cases should
always return.
This commit is part of a series that makes Polly more robust on the presence of
unreachables.
llvm-svn: 297147
r296992 made ScalarEvolution's CompareValueComplexity less aggressive,
and that broke the polly test being fixed in this change. This change
explicitly bumps CompareValueComplexity in said test case to make it
pass.
Can someone from the polly team please can give me an idea on if this
case is important enough to have
scalar-evolution-max-value-compare-depth be 3 by default?
llvm-svn: 296994
These loads cannot be savely hoisted as the condition guarding the
non-affine region cannot be duplicated to also protect the hoisted load
later on. Today they are dropped in ScopInfo. By checking for this early, we
do not even try to model them and possibly can still optimize smaller regions
not containing this specific required-invariant load.
llvm-svn: 296744
Multi-disjunct access maps can easily result in inbound assumptions which
explode in case of many memory accesses and many parameters. This change reduces
compilation time of some larger kernel from over 15 minutes to less than 16
seconds.
Interesting is the test case test/ScopInfo/multidim_param_in_subscript.ll
which has a memory access
[n] -> { Stmt_for_body3[i0, i1] -> MemRef_A[i0, -1 + n - i1] }
which requires folding, but where only a single disjunct remains. We can still
model this test case even when only using limited memory folding.
For people only reading commit messages, here the comment that explains what
memory folding is:
To recover memory accesses with array size parameters in the subscript
expression we post-process the delinearization results.
We would normally recover from an access A[exp0(i) * N + exp1(i)] into an
array A[][N] the 2D access A[exp0(i)][exp1(i)]. However, another valid
delinearization is A[exp0(i) - 1][exp1(i) + N] which - depending on the
range of exp1(i) - may be preferrable. Specifically, for cases where we
know exp1(i) is negative, we want to choose the latter expression.
As we commonly do not have any information about the range of exp1(i),
we do not choose one of the two options, but instead create a piecewise
access function that adds the (-1, N) offsets as soon as exp1(i) becomes
negative. For a 2D array such an access function is created by applying
the piecewise map:
[i,j] -> [i, j] : j >= 0
[i,j] -> [i-1, j+N] : j < 0
After this patch we generate only the first case, except for situations where
we can proove the first case to be invalid and can consequently select the
second without introducing disjuncts.
llvm-svn: 296679
Without this simplification for a loop nest:
void foo(long n1_a, long n1_b, long n1_c, long n1_d,
long p1_b, long p1_c, long p1_d,
float A_1[][p1_b][p1_c][p1_d]) {
for (long i = 0; i < n1_a; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < n1_b; j++)
for (long k = 0; k < n1_c; k++)
for (long l = 0; l < n1_d; l++)
A_1[i][j][k][l] += i + j + k + l;
}
the assumption:
n1_a <= 0 or (n1_a > 0 and n1_b <= 0) or
(n1_a > 0 and n1_b > 0 and n1_c <= 0) or
(n1_a > 0 and n1_b > 0 and n1_c > 0 and n1_d <= 0) or
(n1_a > 0 and n1_b > 0 and n1_c > 0 and n1_d > 0 and
p1_b >= n1_b and p1_c >= n1_c and p1_d >= n1_d)
is taken rather than the simpler assumption:
p9_b >= n9_b and p9_c >= n9_c and p9_d >= n9_d.
The former is less strict, as it allows arbitrary values of p1_* in case, the
loop is not executed at all. However, in practice these precise constraints
explode when combined across different accesses and loops. For now it seems
to make more sense to take less precise, but more scalable constraints by
default. In case we find a practical example where more precise constraints
are needed, we can think about allowing such precise constraints in specific
situations where they help.
This change speeds up the new test case from taking very long (waited at least
a minute, but it probably takes a lot more) to below a second.
llvm-svn: 296456
Instead of counting the number of read-only accesses, we now count the number of
distinct read-only array references when checking if a run-time alias check
may be too complex. The run-time alias check is quadratic in the number of
base pointers, not the number of accesses.
Before this change we accidentally skipped SPEC's lbm test case.
llvm-svn: 295567
Trying to fold such kind of dimensions will result in a division by zero,
which crashes the compiler. As such arrays are likely to invalidate the
scop anyhow (but are not illegal in LLVM-IR), there is no point in trying
to optimize the array layout. Hence, we just avoid the folding of
constant dimensions of size zero.
llvm-svn: 295415
Before this change wrapping range metadata resulted in exponential growth of
the context, which made context construction of large scops very slow. Instead,
we now just do not model the range information precisely, in case the number
of disjuncts in the context has already reached a certain limit.
llvm-svn: 295360
Commit r230230 introduced the use of range metadata to derive bounds for
parameters, instead of just looking at the type of the parameter. As part of
this commit support for wrapping ranges was added, where the lower bound of a
parameter is larger than the upper bound:
{ 255 < p || p < 0 }
However, at the same time, for wrapping ranges support for adding bounds given
by the size of the containing type has acidentally been dropped. As a result,
the range of the parameters was not guaranteed to be bounded any more. This
change makes sure we always add the bounds given by the size of the type and
then additionally add bounds based on signed wrapping, if available. For a
parameter p with a type size of 32 bit, the valid range is then:
{ -2147483648 <= p <= 2147483647 and (255 < p or p < 0) }
llvm-svn: 295349
When deriving the range of valid values of a scalar evolution expression might
be a range [12, 8), where the upper bound is smaller than the lower bound and
where the range is expected to possibly wrap around. We theoretically could
model such a range as a union of two non-wrapping ranges, but do not do this
as of yet. Instead, we just do not derive any bounds. Before this change,
we could have obtained bounds where the maximal possible value is strictly
smaller than the minimal possible value, which is incorrect and also caused
assertions during scop modeling.
llvm-svn: 294891
Before this change we created an additional reload in the copy of the incoming
block of a PHI node to reload the incoming value, even though the necessary
value has already been made available by the normally generated scalar loads.
In this change, we drop the code that generates this redundant reload and
instead just reuse the scalar value already available.
Besides making the generated code slightly cleaner, this change also makes sure
that scalar loads go through the normal logic, which means they can be remapped
(e.g. to array slots) and corresponding code is generated to load from the
remapped location. Without this change, the original scalar load at the
beginning of the non-affine region would have been remapped, but the redundant
scalar load would continue to load from the old PHI slot location.
It might be possible to further simplify the code in addOperandToPHI,
but this would not only mean to pull out getNewValue, but to also change the
insertion point update logic. As this did not work when trying it the first
time, this change is likely not trivial. To not introduce bugs last minute, we
postpone further simplications to a subsequent commit.
We also document the current behavior a little bit better.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28892
llvm-svn: 292486
This allows us to delinearize code such as the one below, where the array
sizes are A[][2 * n] as there are n times two elements in the innermost
dimension. Alternatively, we could try to generate another dimension for the
struct in the innermost dimension, but as the struct has constant size,
recovering this dimension is easy.
struct com {
double Real;
double Img;
};
void foo(long n, struct com A[][n]) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < 1000; j++)
A[i][j].Real += A[i][j].Img;
}
int main() {
struct com A[100][1000];
foo(1000, A);
llvm-svn: 288489
Siddharth Bhat