Summary:
The new API appends an image search path to the
target's path mapping list.
Reviewers: aprantl, clayborg, labath
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: ki.stfu, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49739
llvm-svn: 339175
These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used
from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves
overall code layering (although it still does not break any particular
dependency completely).
The XCode project will need to be updated after this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740
llvm-svn: 339127
In the lldb-bench/arithmetic benchmark, 1.7% of the total running time
is spent zero-initializing a std::vector that has already been zeroed.
llvm-svn: 339051
In this patch I add support for ARM and ARM64 break pad files. There are two flavors of ARM: Apple where FP is R7, and non Apple where FP is R11. Added minimal tests that load up ARM64 and the two flavors or ARM core files with a single thread and known register values in each register. Each register is checked for the exact value.
This is a fixed version of: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49750
The changes from D49750 are:
Don't init the m_arch in the Initialize call as a system info isn't required. This keeps the thread list, module list and other tests from failing
Added -Wextended-offsetof to Xcode project so we catch use extended usages of offsetof before submission
Fixed any extended offset of warnings
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50336
llvm-svn: 339032
Summary: `IsEmpty()` and `operator bool() == false` have equal semantics. Usage in Mangled::GetDemangledName() was incorrect. What it actually wants is a check for null-string. Split this off of D50071 and added a test to clarify usage.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Subscribers: erik.pilkington, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50327
llvm-svn: 339014
I noticed a suspicious failure:
[ RUN ] VMRange.CollectionContains
llvm/src/tools/lldb/unittests/Utility/VMRangeTest.cpp:146: Failure
Value of: VMRange::ContainsRange(collection, VMRange(0x100, 0x104))
Actual: false
Expected: true
Looking at the code, it is a very real bug:
class RangeInRangeUnaryPredicate {
public:
RangeInRangeUnaryPredicate(VMRange range) : _range(range) {} // note that _range binds to a temporary!
bool operator()(const VMRange &range) const {
return range.Contains(_range);
}
const VMRange &_range;
};
This change fixes the bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50290
llvm-svn: 338949
Summary:
This wrapper will allow us in the future to reuse LLVM methods from within the
Stream class.
Currently no test as this is intended to be an internal class that shouldn't have any
NFC. The test for this change will be the follow up patch that migrates LLDB's
LEB128 implementation to the one from LLVM.
This change also adds custom move/assignment methods to Stream, as LLVM
raw_ostream doesn't support these. As our internal stream has anyway no state,
we can just keep the same stream object around.
Reviewers: davide, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: xiaobai, labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50161
llvm-svn: 338901
This reverts commit r338734 (and subsequent fixups in r338772 and
r338746), because it breaks some minidump unit tests and introduces a
lot of compiler warnings.
llvm-svn: 338828
In this patch I add support for ARM and ARM64 break pad files. There are two flavors of ARM: Apple where FP is R7, and non Apple where FP is R11. Added minimal tests that load up ARM64 and the two flavors or ARM core files with a single thread and known register values in each register. Each register is checked for the exact value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49750
llvm-svn: 338734
Summary:
This patch allows LLDB's Stream class to count the bytes it has written to so far.
There are two major motivations for this patch:
The first one is that this will allow us to get rid of all the handwritten byte counting code
we have in LLDB so far. Examples for this are pretty much all functions in LLDB that
take a Stream to write to and return a size_t, which usually represents the bytes written.
By moving to this centralized byte counting mechanism, we hopefully can avoid some
tricky errors that happen when some code forgets to count the written bytes while
writing something to a stream.
The second motivation is that this is needed for the migration away from LLDB's `Stream`
and towards LLVM's `raw_ostream`. My current plan is to start offering a fake raw_ostream
class that just forwards to a LLDB Stream.
However, for this raw_ostream wrapper we need to fulfill the raw_ostream interface with
LLDB's Stream, which currently lacks the ability to count the bytes written so far (which
raw_ostream exposes by it's `tell()` method). By adding this functionality it is trivial to start
rolling out our raw_ostream wrapper (and then eventually completely move to raw_ostream).
Also, once this fake raw_ostream is available, we can start replacing our own code writing
to LLDB's Stream by LLVM code writing to raw_ostream. The best example for this is the
LEB128 encoding we currently ship, which can be replaced with by LLVM's version which
accepts an raw_ostream.
From the point of view of the pure source changes this test does, we essentially just renamed
the Write implementation in Stream to `WriteImpl` while the `Write` method everyone is using
to write its raw bytes is now just forwarding and counting the written bytes.
Reviewers: labath, davide
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50159
llvm-svn: 338733
Summary:
This patch adds syntax highlighting support to LLDB. When enabled (and lldb is allowed
to use colors), printed source code is annotated with the ANSI color escape sequences.
So far we have only one highlighter which is based on Clang and is responsible for all
languages that are supported by Clang. It essentially just runs the raw lexer over the input
and then surrounds the specific tokens with the configured escape sequences.
Reviewers: zturner, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: labath, teemperor, llvm-commits, mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49334
llvm-svn: 338662
Clarify how StackFrameList works by documenting its methods. Also,
delete some dead code and insert some TODOs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50087
llvm-svn: 338590
Splitting GetOnlyConcreteFramesUpTo will make it easier to implement
support for synthetic tail call frames in backtraces. This is just a
prep change, no functionality is affected.
llvm-svn: 338588
Summary: No one is using this method, and it also doesn't really make a lot of sense to have it around.
Reviewers: davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50026
llvm-svn: 338345
Summary:
We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we
calculated so far. This leads to a few problems:
Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results
by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency,
but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially
the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess
things up right now.
Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with
this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be.
Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently
giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler.
This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to:
1. A handler can suggest a completion.
2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have.
Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but
getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch.
Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers.
The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we
don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only
been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch
as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself.
Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322
llvm-svn: 338151
Summary: This class doesn't seem to be used anywhere, so we might as well remove the code.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49755
llvm-svn: 337855
Summary:
The dump function was the only part of this class which depended on
high-level functionality. This was due to the DumpDataExtractor
function, which uses info from a running target to control dump format
(although, RegisterValue doesn't really use the high-level part of
DumpDataExtractor).
This patch follows the same approach done for the DataExtractor class,
and extracts the dumping code into a separate function/file. This file
can stay in the higher level code, while the RegisterValue class and
anything that does not depend in dumping can stay go to lower layers.
The XCode project will need to be updated after this patch.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48351
llvm-svn: 337832
Summary:
This patch fixes a few problems with the FormatAnsiTerminalCodes function:
* It does an infinite loop on an unknown color value.
* It crashes when the color value is at the end of the string.
* It deletes the first character behind the color token.
Also added a few tests that reproduce those problems (and test some other corner cases).
Reviewers: davide, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49307
llvm-svn: 337189
The synthetic child providers for these classes had a type expression that matched
pointers & references to the type, but the Front End only worked on the actual object.
I fixed this by adding a way for the Synthetic Child FrontEnd provider to request dereference,
and then had these formatters use that mode.
<rdar://problem/40849836>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49279
llvm-svn: 337035
Summary: Should fix the builds (and prevent future builds from failing when people try to reduce includes).
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49311
llvm-svn: 337032
Summary:
As suggested in D48796, this patch replaces even more internal calls that were using the old
completion API style with a single CompletionRequest. In some cases we also pass an option
vector/index, but as we don't always have this information, it currently is not part of the
CompletionRequest class.
The constructor of the CompletionRequest is now also more sensible. You only pass the
user input, cursor position and your list of matches to the request and the rest will be
inferred (using the same code we used before to calculate this). You also have to pass these
match window parameters to it, even though they are unused right now.
The patch shouldn't change any behavior.
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48976
llvm-svn: 337031
Summary:
This patch gets rid of the C-string parameter in the RawCommandObject::DoExecute function,
making the code simpler and less memory unsafe.
There seems to be a assumption in some command objects that this parameter could be a nullptr,
but from what I can see the rest of the API doesn't actually allow this (and other command
objects and related code pieces dereference this parameter without any checks).
Especially CommandObjectRegexCommand has error handling code for a nullptr that is now gone.
Reviewers: davide, jingham, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49207
llvm-svn: 336955
Summary: The current documentation does not include the error parameter.
Reviewers: jingham, asmith
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49251
llvm-svn: 336948
Summary:
This patch adds the possibility to specify an exit code when calling quit.
We accept any int, even though it depends on the user what happens if the int is
out of the range of what the operating system supports as exit codes.
Fixes rdar://problem/38452312
Reviewers: davide, jingham, clayborg
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: clayborg, jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48659
llvm-svn: 336824
Summary:
A subset of the LLDB commands follows this command line interface style:
<command name> [arguments] -- <string suffix>
The parsing code for this interface has been so far been duplicated into the different
command objects which makes it hard to maintain and reuse elsewhere.
This patches improves the situation by adding a OptionsWithRaw class that centralizes
the parsing logic and allows easier testing. The different commands now just call this class to
extract the arguments and the raw suffix from the provided user input.
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49106
llvm-svn: 336723
Summary: Add LLDB_API to SBAddress's operator== to fix lldb-mi build on Windows.
Patch by Aleksandr Urakov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49006
llvm-svn: 336494
Summary:
It seems we both have the HAVE_LIBCOMPRESSION define in the config header
and in the source files definitions of some files. This causes that the
Config.h header emits the following warning when we compile the Host module:
```
In file included from <module-includes>:21:
In file included from /Users/teemperor/llvm/llvm/tools/lldb/include/lldb/Host/MainLoop.h:13:
tools/lldb/include/lldb/Host/Config.h:33:9: warning: 'HAVE_LIBCOMPRESSION' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
^
<command line>:1:9: note: previous definition is here
^
```
It's not really clear why the define is in both places (the commit message
just says it fixes some unspecified bug), but we can easily work around this
by just guarding our define in Config.h.
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48977
llvm-svn: 336377
Summary: The new API allows to find a list of compile units related to target/module.
Reviewers: aprantl, clayborg
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48801
llvm-svn: 336200
Summary:
This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single
CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest
contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes
the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command
possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args).
This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as
minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has.
Some Q&A:
Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API?
A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the
smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future.
The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully
saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch.
Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods
(like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class?
A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch.
Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern?
A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have
to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions
from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change.
Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches?
A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch).
Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command?
A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested
request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory
propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the
behavior too much).
Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing
them together in one in/out parameter?
A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just
a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what
is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters).
Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment?
A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think
they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just
takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user.
Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796
llvm-svn: 336146
Summary:
The data structure is optimized for the case where the UUID size is <=
20 bytes (standard length emitted by the GNU linkers), but larger sizes
are also possible.
I've modified the string conversion function to support the new sizes as
well. For standard UUIDs it maintains the traditional formatting
(4-2-2-2-6). If a UUID is shorter, we just cut this sequence short, and
for longer UUIDs it will just repeat the last 6-byte block as long as
necessary.
I've also modified ObjectFileELF to take advantage of the new UUIDs and
avoid manually padding the UUID to 16 bytes. While there, I also made
sure the computed UUID does not depend on host endianness.
Reviewers: clayborg, lemo, sas, davide, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48633
llvm-svn: 335963
This provides an efficient (at least on Posix platforms) way to offload to the
target process the search & loading of a library when all we have are the
library name and a set of potential candidate locations.
<rdar://problem/40905971>
llvm-svn: 335912
This change allows to make AddressClass strongly typed enum and not to have issues with old versions of SWIG that don't support enum classes.
llvm-svn: 335710
Summary:
During the previous attempt to generalize the UUID class, it was
suggested that we represent invalid UUIDs as length zero (previously, we
used an all-zero UUID for that). This meant that some valid build-ids
could not be represented (it's possible however unlikely that a checksum of
some file would be zero) and complicated adding support for variable
length build-ids (should a 16-byte empty UUID compare equal to a 20-byte
empty UUID?).
This patch resolves these issues by introducing a canonical
representation for an invalid UUID. The slight complication here is that
some clients (MachO) actually use the all-zero notation to mean "no UUID
has been set". To keep this use case working (while making it very
explicit about which construction semantices are wanted), replaced the
UUID constructors and the SetBytes functions with named factory methods.
- "fromData" creates a UUID from the given data, and it treats all bytes
equally.
- "fromOptionalData" first checks the data contents - if all bytes are
zero, it treats this as an invalid/empty UUID.
Reviewers: clayborg, sas, lemo, davide, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48479
llvm-svn: 335612
If we have a function with signature f(addr_t, AddressClass), it is easy to muddle up the order of arguments without any warnings from compiler. 'enum class' prevents passing integer in place of AddressClass and vice versa.
llvm-svn: 335599
Instead of a separate GetBytes + GetByteSize methods I introduce a
single GetBytes method returning an ArrayRef.
This is NFC cleanup now, but it should make handling arbitrarily-sized
UUIDs cleaner, should we choose to go that way. I also took the
opportunity to add some unit tests for this class.
llvm-svn: 335244
Vedant Kumar