Summary:
This changes ReleaseNotes.txt to have the first sentence of the full
documentation from linuxkernel-must-use-errs.rst.
This addresses a comment from the review of rL367071 in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59963.
Reviewers: Eugene.Zelenko
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65343
llvm-svn: 367333
LoopInfo can be easily preserved by passing it to the functions that
modify the CFG (SplitCriticalEdge and MergeBlockIntoPredecessor.
SplitCriticalEdge also preserves LoopSimplify and LCSSA form when when passing in
LoopInfo. The test case shows that we preserve LoopSimplify and
LoopInfo. Adding addPreservedID(LCSSAID) did not preserve LCSSA for some
reason.
Also I am not sure if it is possible to preserve those in the new pass
manager, as they aren't analysis passes.
Reviewers: reames, hfinkel, davide, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65137
llvm-svn: 367332
Now that the Xcode project is removed, I want to focus on dotest as a
test framework, and remove its driver capabilities for which we already
rely on llvm's lit. Removing multiprocessing is the first step in that
direction.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65311
llvm-svn: 367331
The default mode is separate, where the metadata is serialized
separately from the remarks.
Another mode is the standalone mode, where the metadata is serialized
before the remarks, on the same stream.
llvm-svn: 367328
Summary:
This patch extends the use of the OptimizationRemarkEmitter to provide
information about loops that are not fused, and loops that are not eligible for
fusion. In particular, it uses the OptimizationRemarkAnalysis to identify loops
that are not eligible for fusion and the OptimizationRemarkMissed to identify
loops that cannot be fused.
It also reuses the statistics to provide the messages used in the
OptimizationRemarks. This provides common message strings between the
optimization remarks and the statistics.
I would like feedback on this approach, in general. If people are OK with this,
I will flesh out additional remarks in subsequent commits.
Subscribers: hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63844
llvm-svn: 367327
Empty condition strings are considerde always true. This removes a lot
of clutter from the generated matcher tables.
This shrinks the source size of AMDGPUGenDAGISel.inc from 7.3M to
6.1M.
llvm-svn: 367326
Addresses number of comment made on D64652 after commiting:
- Reorders function decls in the TargetLoweringObjectFileXCOFF class.
- Fix comment in MCSectionXCOFF to include description of external reference
csects.
- Convert several llvm_unreachables to report_fatal_error
- Convert several dyn_casts to casts as they are expected not to fail.
- Avoid copying DataLayout object.
llvm-svn: 367324
In `CodeGenFunction::EmitAArch64BuiltinExpr()`, bulk move all of the aarch64 MSVC-builtin cases to an earlier point in the function (the `// Handle non-overloaded intrinsics first` switch block) in order to avoid an unreachable in `GetNeonType()`. The NEON type-overloading logic is not appropriate for the Windows builtins.
Fixes https://llvm.org/pr42775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65403
llvm-svn: 367323
Summary:
I have stumbled into this by accident while preparing to extend backend `x s% C ==/!= 0` handling.
While we did happen to handle this fold in most of the cases,
the folding is indirect - we fold `x u% y` to `x & (y-1)` (iff `y` is power-of-two),
or first turn `x s% -y` to `x u% y`; that does handle most of the cases.
But we can't turn `x s% INT_MIN` to `x u% -INT_MIN`,
and thus we end up being stuck with `(x s% INT_MIN) == 0`.
There is no such restriction for the more general fold:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/IIeS
To be noted, the fold does not enforce that `y` is a constant,
so it may indeed increase instruction count.
This is consistent with what `x u% y`->`x & (y-1)` already does.
I think it makes sense, it's at most one (simple) extra instruction,
while `rem`ainder is really much more un-simple (and likely **very** costly).
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, nikic, xbolva00, craig.topper
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65046
llvm-svn: 367322
Instead of displaying a help message, it was issuing an error message:
AttributeError: 'Namespace' object has no attribute 'func'
https://bugs.python.org/issue16308 has more information on the bug.
llvm-svn: 367320
[cpp.predefined]p2:
__STDCPP_THREADS__
Defined, and has the value integer literal 1, if and only if a program
can have more than one thread of execution .
Also define it only if it's not defined already, since it's supposed
to be defined by the compiler.
Also move it from thread to __config (which requires setting it only
if _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREADS is not defined).
Part of PR33230. The intent is to eventually make the compiler define
this instead.
llvm-svn: 367316
These tests have been disabled on Linux and Windows due to failing
there. I think that could be down to a race condition between stdout
and stderr, so I have disabled output to stdout.
For the moment, only re-enable on linux, because I don't have a windows
machine to test on.
llvm-svn: 367311
Initially Inputs/alloc-symtab.o was added in D42222.
It contains an allocatable .symtab section. Today
we are able to create such sections using yaml2obj.
Later people started using this input for no solid reason in their tests.
Now multiple of tests are using it.
(And those tests do not need such a specific case actually).
In this patch I removed this binary and rewrote the few tests.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65278
llvm-svn: 367310
Summary:
Tab completing inside the multiline expression command can cause LLDB to crash. The easiest way
to do this is to go inside a frame with at least one local variable and then try to complete:
(lldb) expr
1. a[tab]
Reason for this was some mixup when we calculate the cursor position. Obviously we should calculate
the offset inside the string by doing 'end - start', but we are doing 'start - end' (which causes the offset to
become -1 which will lead to some out-of-bounds reading).
Fixes rdar://51754005
I don't see any way to test this as the *multiline* expression completion is completely untested at the moment
and I don't think we have any existing code for testing infrastructure for it.
Reviewers: shafik, davide, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, davide, clayborg, labath
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64995
llvm-svn: 367308
PR42819 showed an issue that we couldn't handle the case where we demanded a 'sub-sub-vector' of the SUBV_BROADCAST 'sub-vector' source.
This patch recognizes these cases and extracts the sub-sub-vector instead of trying to broadcast to a type smaller than the 'sub-vector' source.
llvm-svn: 367306
make check-all currently fails on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11 when building with GCC 9:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
_ZN11__sanitizer14internal_lseekEimi SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_libc_test.cc.i386.o
_ZN11__sanitizer23MapWritableFileToMemoryEPvmim SANITIZER_TEST_OBJECTS.sanitizer_libc_test.cc.i386.o
ld: fatal: symbol referencing errors
clang-9: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
make[3]: *** [projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/CMakeFiles/TSanitizer-i386-Test.dir/build.make:92: projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/Sanitizer-i386-Test] Error 1
While e.g. __sanitizer::internal_lseek is defined in sanitizer_solaris.cc, g++ 9
predefines _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 while clang++ currently does not.
This patch resolves this inconsistency by following the gcc lead, which allows
make check-all to finish successfully.
There's one caveat: gcc defines _LARGEFILE_SOURCE and _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE for C++ only, while clang has long been doing it for
all languages. I'd like to keep it this way because those macros do is to make
declarations of fseek/ftello (_LARGEFILE_SOURCE) resp. the 64-bit versions
of largefile functions (*64 with _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE) visible additionally.
However, _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 changes all affected functions to be largefile-aware.
I'd like to restrict this to C++, just like gcc does.
To avoid a similar inconsistence with host compilers that don't predefine _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
(e.g. clang < 9, gcc < 9), this needs a compantion patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D64483.
Tested on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64482
llvm-svn: 367305
This is the compantion patch to https://reviews.llvm.org/D64482, needed to ensure
that builds with host compilers that don't yet predefine _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 on
Solaris succeed by always making the host and freshly built clang consistent.
Tested on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64483
llvm-svn: 367304
Summary:
This fixes a case where we show diagnostics on arbitrary lines, in an
internal codebase.
Open for ideas on unittesting this.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64863
llvm-svn: 367303
Summary: The lldb build system made good progress in the last months, but documentation was still lacking behind. Here's a patch to catch up.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jingham, labath, stella.stamenova, teemperor, jryans, kastiglione, xiaobai, compnerd, zturner
Reviewed By: labath, stella.stamenova, jryans
Subscribers: clayborg, amccarth, friss, lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65330
llvm-svn: 367302
The Arm C Language Extensions for SVE document specifies that
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE should be set when the compiler supports SVE and
implements all the extensions described in the document.
This is currently not yet the case, so the feature should be disabled
until the compiler can provide all the extensions as described.
Reviewers: c-rhodes, rengolin, rovka, ktkachov
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65404
llvm-svn: 367301
This time, the warning pointed to an actual problem, because the
coff_opt_header structure contained a std::vector. I guess this happened
to work because the all-zero state was a valid representation of an
empty vector, but its not a good idea to rely on that.
I remove the memset, and have the structure clear its members in the
constructor instead.
llvm-svn: 367299
Summary:
The last bit of functionality in SymbolVendor passthrough functions is
the locking the module mutex. While it may be nice doing the locking in
a central place, we weren't really succesful in doing that right now,
because some SymbolFile function could still be called without going
through the SymbolVendor. This meant in SymbolFileDWARF (the only
battle-tested symbol file implementation) roughly a half of the
functions was taking additional locks and another half was asserting
that the lock is already held. By making the SymbolFile responsible for
locking, we can at least make the situation in SymbolFileDWARF more
consistent.
Reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere, jingham, jdoerfert
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65329
llvm-svn: 367298
The code is now in a good enough state to pass the bunch of tests that
I have run (after fixing the bugs), so let's enable it by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65277
llvm-svn: 367297
Revert the hardware loop upon finding a LoopEnd that doesn't target
the loop header, instead of asserting a failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65268
llvm-svn: 367296
Two SPARC builtins tests are currently FAILing due to codegen bugs:
Builtins-sparc-sunos :: divtc3_test.c
Builtins-sparcv9-sunos :: compiler_rt_logbl_test.c
Builtins-sparcv9-sunos :: divtc3_test.c
I'd like to XFAIL them to reduce testsuite noise.
Done as follows, tested on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 and x86_64-pc-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64796
llvm-svn: 367295
As discussed in the review, that fold is only valid for positive
divisors, so while we can negate negative divisors,
we have to special-case INT_MIN.
llvm-svn: 367294
AddressSanitizer-*-sunos :: TestCases/intercept-rethrow-exception.cc currently FAILs
on Solaris. This happens because std::rethrow_exception cannot be intercepted, as
detailed in Bug 42703.
To account for this and reduce testsuite noise, this patch XFAILs the test.
Tested on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65056
llvm-svn: 367293
Summary:
Patch removes SVE and SVE2 features from ARMTargetParser as these
features are not supported on ARM.
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65385
llvm-svn: 367292
Compare the directory paths returned by lldb-vscode against realpaths
rather than apparent paths. This matches lldb-vscode behavior
and therefore fixes test failures when one of the parent directories
of the source tree is a symlink.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65432
llvm-svn: 367291
test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C/miniGMG broke:
Only PHI nodes may reference their own value!
%sub33 = srem i32 %sub33, %ranks_in_i
This reverts commit r367288.
llvm-svn: 367289
Summary:
While `-div-rem-pairs` pass can decompose rem in div+rem pair when div-rem pair
is unsupported by target, nothing performs the opposite fold.
We can't do that in InstCombine or DAGCombine since neither of those has access to TTI.
So it makes most sense to teach `-div-rem-pairs` about it.
If we matched rem in expanded form, we know we will be able to place div-rem pair
next to each other so we won't regress the situation.
Also, we shouldn't decompose rem if we matched already-decomposed form.
This is surprisingly straight-forward otherwise.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42673
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma, ZaMaZaN4iK, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: bogner, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65298
llvm-svn: 367288
The test was not previously run due to decorator bug (fixed in r366903).
It is not a regression and is probably related to the other failing
test, so just disable it.
llvm-svn: 367285
I removed all uses of AlignedCharArray since the minimum MSVC version can handle
alignas on char arrays correctly. We can therefore remove AlignedCharArray.
This patch also updates AlignedCharArrayUnion to use C++11.
llvm-svn: 367282
Francis Visoiu Mistrih