Summary:
This patch makes it possible for clang-tidy clients to provide
different options for different translation units. The option, which doesn't
make sense to be file-dependent, was moved to a separate ClangTidyGlobalOptions
struct. Added parsing of ClangTidyOptions.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3979
llvm-svn: 210260
Summary:
This is going to be used for a clang-tidy-diff script to display
warnings in changed lines only. The option uses JSON, as its value is not
intended to be entered manually.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3873
llvm-svn: 209450
Summary:
Handle various forms of existing namespace closing comments, fix
existing comments with wrong namespace name, ignore short namespaces.
The state of this check now seems to be enough to enable it by default to gather
user feedback ;)
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3825
llvm-svn: 209141
Summary:
Make checks filtering more intuitive and easy to use. Remove
-disable-checks and change the format of -checks= to a comma-separated list of
globs with optional '-' prefix to denote exclusion. The -checks= option is now
cumulative, so it modifies defaults, not overrides them. Each glob adds or
removes to the current set of checks, so the filter can be refined or overriden
by adding globs.
Example:
The default value for -checks= is
'*,-clang-analyzer-alpha*,-llvm-include-order,-llvm-namespace-comment,-google-*',
which allows all checks except for the ones named clang-analyzer-alpha* and
others specified with the leading '-'. To allow all google-* checks one can
write:
clang-tidy -checks=google-* ...
If one needs only google-* checks, we first need to remove everything (-*):
clang-tidy -checks=-*,google-*
etc.
I'm not sure if we need to change something here, so I didn't touch the docs
yet.
Reviewers: klimek, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3770
llvm-svn: 208883
array. This simplifies usage of ClangTidyContext a bit and seems to be more
consistent.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3685
llvm-svn: 208407
defined in a macro.
Summary:
We shouldn't suggest replacements in macros anyway, as we can't see all
usages of the macro and ensure the replacement is safe for all of them.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3611
llvm-svn: 207987
Summary:
The Google C++ Style Guide doesn't require copy constructors to be
declared explicit, but some people do this by mistake. Make this check detect
and fix such cases.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3541
llvm-svn: 207531
Summary:
Add new 'let' command to bind arbitrary values into constants.
These constants can then be used in the matcher expressions.
Reviewers: pcc
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3383
llvm-svn: 206984
Summary:
This patch implements filtering of clang-tidy diagnostic messages by
the check name, so that "clang-tidy -checks=^llvm-" won't output any clang
warnings, for example. This is also helpful to run specific static-analyzer
checks: static analyzer always needs core checks to be enabled, but the user may
be interested only in the checks he asked for.
This patch also exposes warning option names for built-in diagnostics. We need
to have a namespace for these names to avoid collisions and to allow convenient
filtering, so I prefix them with "-W". I'm not sure it's the best thing to do,
and maybe "W" or "clang-diagnostic-" or something like this would be better.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3121
llvm-svn: 204321
This checks that parameters named in comments that appear before arguments in
function and constructor calls match the parameter name used in the callee's
declaration. For example:
void f(int x, int y);
void g() {
f(/*y=*/0, /*z=*/0);
}
contains two violations of the policy, as the names 'x' and 'y' used in the
declaration do not match names 'y' and 'z' used at the call site.
I think there is significant value in being able to check/enforce this policy
as a way of guarding against accidental API misuse and silent breakages
caused by API changes.
Although this pattern appears somewhat frequently in the LLVM codebase,
this policy is not prescribed by the LLVM coding standards at the moment,
so it lives under 'misc'.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2914
llvm-svn: 204113
This removes all references to OwningPtr, which should be fairly
undisruptive to out-of-tree projects since they are unlikely to use
clang-tools-extra as a library instead of a set of tools.
llvm-svn: 203382
Summary:
I'm not absolutely sure this is 100% correct solution, but it seems to
do what I expect.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2756
llvm-svn: 201308
always produce as pretty of results as it does in LLVM and Clang, but
I don't mind and the value of having a single canonical ordering is very
high IMO.
Let me know if you spot really serious problems here.
llvm-svn: 198703
This is implemented in a way that the current static analyzer
architecture allows, in the future we might want to revisit this.
With this change static analyzer checks are available from clang-tidy
by specifying -checks=clang-analyzer-<name>.
This change also fixes the use of the compilation database to allow
clang-tidy to be used like any other clang tool.
llvm-svn: 194707
This tool is for interactive exploration of the Clang AST using AST matchers.
It currently allows the user to enter a matcher at an interactive prompt
and view the resulting bindings as diagnostics, AST pretty prints or AST
dumps. Example session:
$ cat foo.c
void foo(void) {}
$ clang-query foo.c --
clang-query> match functionDecl()
Match #1:
foo.c:1:1: note: "root" binds here
void foo(void) {}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 match.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2098
llvm-svn: 194227
Summary:
The clang-apply-replacements process is now invoked to apply
replacements between applying transforms. This resulted in a massive
simplification of the tool:
- FileOverrides class no longer needed.
- Change tracking and code formatting no longer needed.
- No more dependency on libclangApplyReplacements.
- Final syntax check is easier to do directly now than with a separate
header/source pair.
Replacement handling stuff abstracted into a new header/source pair to
de-clutter ClangModernize.cpp somewhat.
Tests updated.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1836
llvm-svn: 192032
The tool now supports a collection of arguments to turn on and provide settings
for the formatting of code affected by applying replacements:
* --format turns on formatting (default style is LLVM)
* --style controls code style settings
* --style-config allows one to explicitly indicate where a style config file
lives.
The libclangApplyReplacements interface has a new function to turn Replacements
into Ranges to be used with tooling::reformat().
llvm-svn: 191667
clang-modernize can now transform headers properly and the experimental
-headers option is no longer necessary.
Remember, at least -include is necessary for indicating which headers
are allowed to be changed.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1610
llvm-svn: 190158
There is no reason to expect this tool to be limited to C++11, it seems
very likely to be of on-going interest. It seems likely to be useful for
modernizing even as new libraries come out in TSes and other formats
than a complete standard. Fundamentally, we need something a bit more
general. After some discussion on the list, going with
'clang-modernize'.
I've tried to do a reasonably comprehensive job of fixing up the names,
but I may still have missed some. Feel free to poke me if you spot any
fallout here. Things I've tried reasonably hard to find and fix:
- cpp11-migrate -> clang-modernize
- Migrator -> Modernizer
- Clean up the introductory documentation that was C++11 specific.
I'll also point out that this tool continues to delight me. =] Also,
a huge thanks to those who have so carefully, thoroughly documented the
tool. The docs here are simply phenomenal. Every tool should be this
well documented. I hope I have updated the documentation reasonably
well, but I'm not very good at documentation, so review much
appreciated.
llvm-svn: 189960
Alexander Kornienko