and separates lexical name lookup from qualified name lookup. In
particular:
* Make DeclContext the central data structure for storing and
looking up declarations within existing declarations, e.g., members
of structs/unions/classes, enumerators in C++0x enums, members of
C++ namespaces, and (later) members of Objective-C
interfaces/implementations. DeclContext uses a lazily-constructed
data structure optimized for fast lookup (array for small contexts,
hash table for larger contexts).
* Implement C++ qualified name lookup in terms of lookup into
DeclContext.
* Implement C++ unqualified name lookup in terms of
qualified+unqualified name lookup (since unqualified lookup is not
purely lexical in C++!)
* Limit the use of the chains of declarations stored in
IdentifierInfo to those names declared lexically.
* Eliminate CXXFieldDecl, collapsing its behavior into
FieldDecl. (FieldDecl is now a ScopedDecl).
* Make RecordDecl into a DeclContext and eliminates its
Members/NumMembers fields (since one can just iterate through the
DeclContext to get the fields).
llvm-svn: 60878
"else" clause, e.g.,
if (int X = foo()) {
} else {
if (X) { // warning: X is always zero in this context
}
}
Fixes rdar://6425550 and lets me think about something other than
DeclContext.
llvm-svn: 60858
This is a follow-up to fixing <rdar://problem/6213955> clang ObjC rewriter: rewriter doesn't appear to support @property and @synthesize.
llvm-svn: 60700
code were working correctly, it would be a no-op, but it's not really a
proper fix. That said, I don't really want to touch the enum code at
the moment because I don't understand it very well, and this seems to
be a relatively visible regression.
llvm-svn: 60680
template<typename T> void f(T x) {
g(x); // g is a dependent name, so don't even bother to look it up
g(); // error: g is not a dependent name
}
Note that when we see "g(", we build a CXXDependentNameExpr. However,
if none of the call arguments are type-dependent, we will force the
resolution of the name "g" and replace the CXXDependentNameExpr with
its result.
GCC actually produces a nice error message when you make this
mistake, and even offers to compile your code with -fpermissive. I'll
do the former next, but I don't plan to do the latter.
llvm-svn: 60618
expressions, and value-dependent expressions. This permits us to parse
some template definitions.
This is not a complete solution; we're missing type- and
value-dependent computations for most of the expression types, and
we're missing checks for dependent types and type-dependent
expressions throughout Sema.
llvm-svn: 60615
property. It also checks for duplicate use of the same ivar
in two different iproperty implementations. It also caught
an error for a test case used in CodeGen :).
llvm-svn: 60610
parameters, with some semantic analysis:
- Template parameters are introduced into template parameter scope
- Complain about template parameter shadowing (except in Microsoft mode)
Note that we leak template parameter declarations like crazy, a
problem we'll remedy once we actually create proper declarations for
templates.
Next up: dependent types and value-dependent/type-dependent
expressions.
llvm-svn: 60597
the containing block. Introduce a new getCurFunctionOrMethodDecl
method to check to see if we're in a function or objc method.
Minor cleanups to other related places. This fixes rdar://6405429.
llvm-svn: 60564
specific targets default them to on. Default blocks to on on 10.6 and later.
Add a -fblocks option that allows the user to override the target's default.
Use -fblocks in the various testcases that use blocks.
llvm-svn: 60563
Douglas Gregor