Immutable DILineInfo doesn't bring any benefits and complicates
code. Also, use std::string instead of SmallString<16> for file
and function names - their length can vary significantly.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 206654
While unnamed relocations are already cached in side tables in
ELFObjectWriter::RecordRelocation, symbols still need their fragments
updated to refer to the newly compressed fragment (even if that fragment
isn't big enough to fit the offset). Even though we only create
temporary symbols in debug info sections this comes up in 32 bit builds
where even temporary symbols in mergeable sections (such as debug_str)
have to be emitted as named symbols.
I tried a few other ways to do this but they all didn't work for various
reasons:
1) Canonicalize the MCSymbolData in RecordRelocation, nulling out the
Fragment (so it didn't have to be updated by CompressDebugSection). This
doesn't work because some code relies on symbols having fragments to
indicate that they're defined, I think.
2) Canonicalize the MCSymbolData in RecordRelocation to be "first
fragment + absolute offset" so it would be cheaper to just test and
update the fragment in CompressDebugSections. This doesn't work because
the offset computed in RecordRelocation isn't that of the symbol's
fragment, it's the passed in fragment (I haven't figured out what that
fragment is - perhaps it's the location where the relocation is to be
written). And if the fragment offset has to be computed only for this
use we might as well just do it when we need to, in
CompressDebugSection.
I also added an assert to help catch this a bit more clearly, even
though it is UB. The test case improvements would either assert fail
and/or valgrind vail without the fix, even if they wouldn't necessarily
fail the FileCheck output.
llvm-svn: 206653
Summary:
This port includes the rudimentary latencies that were provided for
the Cortex-A53 Machine Model in the AArch64 backend. It also changes
the SchedAlias for COPY in the Cyclone model to an explicit
WriteRes mapping to avoid conflicts in other subtargets.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3427
Patch by Dave Estes <cestes@codeaurora.org>!
llvm-svn: 206652
This pass was removed in r184459.
Also added note that the InstCombine pass does library call
simplification.
Patch slightly modified from one by Daniel Liew
<daniel.liew@imperial.ac.uk>!
llvm-svn: 206650
This changes the on-disk hash to get the type to use for offsets from
the Info type, so that clients can be more flexible with the size of
table they support.
llvm-svn: 206643
This changes the on-disk hash to get the size of a hash value from the
Info type, so that clients can be more flexible with the types of hash
they use.
llvm-svn: 206642
When address ranges for compile unit are specified in compile unit DIE
itself, there is no need to collect ranges from children subprogram DIEs.
This change speeds up llvm-symbolizer on Clang-produced binaries with
full debug info. For instance, symbolizing a first address in a 1Gb binary
is now 2x faster (1s vs. 2s).
llvm-svn: 206641
For a 256-bit BUILD_VECTOR consisting mostly of shuffles of 256-bit vectors,
both the BUILD_VECTOR and its operands may need to be legalized in multiple
steps. Consider:
(v8f32 (BUILD_VECTOR (extract_vector_elt (v8f32 %vreg0,) Constant<1>),
(extract_vector_elt %vreg0, Constant<2>),
(extract_vector_elt %vreg0, Constant<3>),
(extract_vector_elt %vreg0, Constant<4>),
(extract_vector_elt %vreg0, Constant<5>),
(extract_vector_elt %vreg0, Constant<6>),
(extract_vector_elt %vreg0, Constant<7>),
%vreg1))
a. We can't build a 256-bit vector efficiently so, we need to split it into
two 128-bit vecs and combine them with VINSERTX128.
b. Operands like (extract_vector_elt (v8f32 %vreg0), Constant<7>) needs to be
split into a VEXTRACTX128 and a further extract_vector_elt from the
resulting 128-bit vector.
c. The extract_vector_elt from b. is lowered into a shuffle to the first
element and a movss.
Depending on the order in which we legalize the BUILD_VECTOR and its
operands[1], buildFromShuffleMostly may be faced with:
(v4f32 (BUILD_VECTOR (extract_vector_elt
(vector_shuffle<1,u,u,u> (extract_subvector %vreg0, Constant<4>), undef),
Constant<0>),
(extract_vector_elt
(vector_shuffle<2,u,u,u> (extract_subvector %vreg0, Constant<4>), undef),
Constant<0>),
(extract_vector_elt
(vector_shuffle<3,u,u,u> (extract_subvector %vreg0, Constant<4>), undef),
Constant<0>),
%vreg1))
In order to figure out the underlying vector and their identity we need to see
through the shuffles.
[1] Note that the order in which operations and their operands are legalized is
only guaranteed in the first iteration of LegalizeDAG.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16296956>
llvm-svn: 206634
This reverts commit r206622 and the MSVC fixup in r206626.
Apparently the remotely failing tests are still failing, despite my
attempt to fix the nondeterminism in r206621.
llvm-svn: 206628
Add a helper method to get address ranges specified in a DIE
(either by DW_AT_low_pc/DW_AT_high_pc, or by DW_AT_ranges). Use it
to untangle and simplify the code.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 206624
This reverts commit r206556, effectively reapplying commit r206548 and
its fixups in r206549 and r206550.
In an intervening commit I've added target triples to the tests that
were failing remotely [1] (but passing locally). I'm hoping the mystery
is solved? I'll revert this again if the tests are still failing
remotely.
[1]: http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-x64-msvc-RA-centos6/builds/1816
llvm-svn: 206622
These tests were failing on some buildbots after r206548 (reverted in
r206556), but passing locally.
They were missing target triples, so maybe that's the problem?
llvm-svn: 206621
Doesn't make sense to restrict this to BumpPtrAllocator. While there
replace an explicit loop with std::equal. Some standard libraries know
how to compile this down to a ::memcmp call if possible.
llvm-svn: 206615
This flag replaces inline instrumentation for checks and origin stores with
calls into MSan runtime library. This is a workaround for PR17409.
Disabled by default.
llvm-svn: 206585
Reality is that we're never going to copy one of these. Supporting this
was becoming a nightmare because nothing even causes it to compile most
of the time. Lots of subtle errors built up that wouldn't have been
caught by any "normal" testing.
Also, make the move assignment actually work rather than the bogus swap
implementation that would just infloop if used. As part of that, factor
out the graph pointer updates into a helper to share between move
construction and move assignment.
llvm-svn: 206583
implementation of the SpecificBumpPtrAllocator -- we have to actually
move the subobject. =] Noticed when using this code more directly.
llvm-svn: 206582
LazyCallGraph. This is the start of the whole point of this different
abstraction, but it is just the initial bits. Here is a run-down of
what's going on here. I'm planning to incorporate some (or all) of this
into comments going forward, hopefully with better editing and wording.
=]
The crux of the problem with the traditional way of building SCCs is
that they are ephemeral. The new pass manager however really needs the
ability to associate analysis passes and results of analysis passes with
SCCs in order to expose these analysis passes to the SCC passes. Making
this work is kind-of the whole point of the new pass manager. =]
So, when we're building SCCs for the call graph, we actually want to
build persistent nodes that stick around and can be reasoned about
later. We'd also like the ability to walk the SCC graph in more complex
ways than just the traditional postorder traversal of the current CGSCC
walk. That means that in addition to being persistent, the SCCs need to
be connected into a useful graph structure.
However, we still want the SCCs to be formed lazily where possible.
These constraints are quite hard to satisfy with the SCC iterator. Also,
using that would bypass our ability to actually add data to the nodes of
the call graph to facilite implementing the Tarjan walk. So I've
re-implemented things in a more direct and embedded way. This
immediately makes it easy to get the persistence and connectivity
correct, and it also allows leveraging the existing nodes to simplify
the algorithm. I've worked somewhat to make this implementation more
closely follow the traditional paper's nomenclature and strategy,
although it is still a bit obtuse because it isn't recursive, using
an explicit stack and a tail call instead, and it is interruptable,
resuming each time we need another SCC.
The other tricky bit here, and what actually took almost all the time
and trials and errors I spent building this, is exactly *what* graph
structure to build for the SCCs. The naive thing to build is the call
graph in its newly acyclic form. I wrote about 4 versions of this which
did precisely this. Inevitably, when I experimented with them across
various use cases, they became incredibly awkward. It was all
implementable, but it felt like a complete wrong fit. Square peg, round
hole. There were two overriding aspects that pushed me in a different
direction:
1) We want to discover the SCC graph in a postorder fashion. That means
the root node will be the *last* node we find. Using the call-SCC DAG
as the graph structure of the SCCs results in an orphaned graph until
we discover a root.
2) We will eventually want to walk the SCC graph in parallel, exploring
distinct sub-graphs independently, and synchronizing at merge points.
This again is not helped by the call-SCC DAG structure.
The structure which, quite surprisingly, ended up being completely
natural to use is the *inverse* of the call-SCC DAG. We add the leaf
SCCs to the graph as "roots", and have edges to the caller SCCs. Once
I switched to building this structure, everything just fell into place
elegantly.
Aside from general cleanups (there are FIXMEs and too few comments
overall) that are still needed, the other missing piece of this is
support for iterating across levels of the SCC graph. These will become
useful for implementing #2, but they aren't an immediate priority.
Once SCCs are in good shape, I'll be working on adding mutation support
for incremental updates and adding the pass manager that this analysis
enables.
llvm-svn: 206581
This commit was attributed to a different person from the person who
posted the patch to the list, and the person who posted it the list
claimed when they did that they were not the author, but that the author
was yet a third person. I don't know what is going on here, but
reverting until the attribution is clear and the author has explicitly
contributed the patch.
Also, the review hasn't really involved any of the MC maintainers and
that seems questionable too.
llvm-svn: 206576
Code mostly copied from AArch64, just tidied up a trifle and plumbed
into the ARM64 way of doing things.
This also enables the AArch64 tests which inspired the previous
untested commits.
llvm-svn: 206574
A vector extract followed by a dup can become a single instruction even if the
types don't match. AArch64 handled this in ISelLowering, but a few reasonably
simple patterns can take care of it in TableGen, so that's where I've put it.
llvm-svn: 206573
ARM64 was scalarizing some vector comparisons which don't quite map to
AArch64's compare and mask instructions. AArch64's approach of sacrificing a
little efficiency to emulate them with the limited set available was better, so
I ported it across.
More "inspired by" than copy/paste since the backend's internal expectations
were a bit different, but the tests were invaluable.
llvm-svn: 206570
I enhanced it a little in the process. The decision shouldn't really be beased
on whether a BUILD_VECTOR is a splat: any set of constants will do the job
provided they're related in the correct way.
Also, the BUILD_VECTOR could be any operand of the incoming AND nodes, so it's
best to check for all 4 possibilities rather than assuming it'll be the RHS.
llvm-svn: 206569
It's not actually used to handle C or C++ ABI rules on ARM64, but could well be
emitted by other language front-ends, so it's as well to have a sensible
implementation.
llvm-svn: 206568
Alexey Samsonov