were overspecified when inheriting sub-subregisters, for instance:
R0Q:subreg_even32 = R0Q:subreg_32bit = R0Q:subreg_even:subreg_32bit.
This meant that composeSubRegIndices(subreg_even, subreg_32bit) was ambiguous.
llvm-svn: 105063
A Register with subregisters must also provide SubRegIndices for adressing the
subregisters. TableGen automatically inherits indices for sub-subregisters to
minimize typing.
CompositeIndices may be specified for the weirder cases such as the XMM sub_sd
index that returns the same register, and ARM NEON Q registers where both D
subregs have ssub_0 and ssub_1 sub-subregs.
It is now required that all subregisters are named by an index, and a future
patch will also require inherited subregisters to be named. This is necessary to
allow composite subregister indices to be reduced to a single index.
llvm-svn: 104704
A Register with subregisters must also provide SubRegIndices for adressing the
subregisters. TableGen automatically inherits indices for sub-subregisters to
minimize typing.
CompositeIndices may be specified for the weirder cases such as the XMM sub_sd
index that returns the same register, and ARM NEON Q registers where both D
subregs have ssub_0 and ssub_1 sub-subregs.
It is now required that all subregisters are named by an index, and a future
patch will also require inherited subregisters to be named. This is necessary to
allow composite subregister indices to be reduced to a single index.
llvm-svn: 104654
structure that represents a mapping without any dependencies on SubRegIndex
numbering.
This brings us closer to being able to remove the explicit SubRegIndex
numbering, and it is now possible to specify any mapping without inventing
*_INVALID register classes.
llvm-svn: 104563
Anton Korobeynikov