type/expression/template argument/etc. is instantiation-dependent if
it somehow involves a template parameter, even if it doesn't meet the
requirements for the more common kinds of dependence (dependent type,
type-dependent expression, value-dependent expression).
When we see an instantiation-dependent type, we know we always need to
perform substitution into that instantiation-dependent type. This
keeps us from short-circuiting evaluation in places where we
shouldn't, and lets us properly implement C++0x [temp.type]p2.
In theory, this would also allow us to properly mangle
instantiation-dependent-but-not-dependent decltype types per the
Itanium C++ ABI, but we aren't quite there because we still mangle
based on the canonical type in cases like, e.g.,
template<unsigned> struct A { };
template<typename T>
void f(A<sizeof(sizeof(decltype(T() + T())))>) { }
template void f<int>(A<sizeof(sizeof(int))>);
and therefore get the wrong answer.
llvm-svn: 134225
member function, i.e. something of the form 'x.f' where 'f' is a non-static
member function. Diagnose this in the general case. Some of the new diagnostics
are probably worse than the old ones, but we now get this right much more
universally, and there's certainly room for improvement in the diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 130239
a couple of operator overloads which form interesting expressions in the
AST.
I added test cases for both bugs with the c-index-test's token
annotation feature. Also, thanks to John McCall for confirming that this
is the correct solution.
llvm-svn: 128768
from how we process ordinary function calls, had a tremendous about of redundancy, and relied
strictly on inlining behavior (which was incomplete) to provide semantics instead of falling
back to the conservative analysis we use for C functions. This is a significant step into
making C++ analyzer support more useful.
llvm-svn: 128557
Change the interface to expose the new information and deal with the enormous fallout.
Introduce the new ExceptionSpecificationType value EST_DynamicNone to more easily deal with empty throw specifications.
Update the tests for noexcept and fix the various bugs uncovered, such as lack of tentative parsing support.
llvm-svn: 127537
UnresolvedLookupExpr and UnresolvedMemberExpr.
Also, improve the computation that checks whether the base of a member
expression (either unresolved or dependent-scoped) is implicit. The
previous check didn't cover all of the cases we use in our
representation, which threw off source-location information for these
expressions (which, in turn, caused some breakage in libclang's token
annotation).
llvm-svn: 126681
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr, and clean up instantiation of
nested-name-specifiers with dependent template specialization types in
the process.
llvm-svn: 126663
logic from CXXMemberCallExpr and by making it check for
CXXOperatorCallExpr in order to defer. This is not really an awesome solution,
but I don't have a better idea.
llvm-svn: 126114
there were only three virtual methods of any significance.
The primary way to grab child iterators now is with
Stmt::child_range children();
Stmt::const_child_range children() const;
where a child_range is just a std::pair of iterators suitable for
being llvm::tie'd to some locals. I've left the old child_begin()
and child_end() accessors in place, but it's probably a substantial
penalty to grab the iterators individually now, since the
switch-based dispatch is kindof inherently slower than vtable
dispatch. Grabbing them together is probably a slight win over the
status quo, although of course we could've achieved that with vtables, too.
I also reclassified SwitchCase (correctly) as an abstract Stmt
class, which (as the first such class that wasn't an Expr subclass)
required some fiddling in a few places.
There are somewhat gross metaprogramming hooks in place to ensure
that new statements/expressions continue to implement
getSourceRange() and children(). I had to work around a recent clang
bug; dgregor actually fixed it already, but I didn't want to
introduce a selfhosting dependency on ToT.
llvm-svn: 125183
deallocation function has a two-argument form. Store the result of this
check in new[] and delete[] nodes.
Fixes rdar://problem/8913519
llvm-svn: 124373
that captures the substitution of a non-type template argument pack
for a non-type template parameter pack within a pack expansion that
cannot be fully expanded. This follows the approach taken by
SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType.
llvm-svn: 123506
template argument (described by an expression, of course). For
example:
template<int...> struct int_tuple { };
template<int ...Values>
struct square {
typedef int_tuple<(Values*Values)...> type;
};
It also lays the foundation for pack expansions in an initializer-list.
llvm-svn: 122751
whether the expression contains an unexpanded parameter pack, in the
same vein as the changes to the Type hierarchy. Compute this bit
within all of the Expr subclasses.
This change required a bunch of reshuffling of dependency
calculations, mainly to consolidate them inside the constructors and
to fuse multiple loops that iterate over arguments to determine type
dependence, value dependence, and (now) containment of unexpanded
parameter packs.
Again, testing is painfully sparse, because all of the diagnostics
will change and it is more important to test the to-be-written visitor
that collects unexpanded parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 121831
class to be passed around. The line between argument and return types and
everything else is kindof vague, but I think it's justifiable.
llvm-svn: 121752
store it on the expression node. Also store an "object kind",
which distinguishes ordinary "addressed" l-values (like
variable references and pointer dereferences) and bitfield,
@property, and vector-component l-values.
Currently we're not using these for much, but I aim to switch
pretty much everything calculating l-valueness over to them.
For now they shouldn't necessarily be trusted.
llvm-svn: 119685
in more situations. In particular, for code like
template<class T> void Fn() { T* x; delete x; }
getDestroyedType() will now return T rather than T*, as it would
before this change. On the other hand, for code like this:
template<class T> void Fn() { T x; delete x; }
getDestroyedType() will return an empty QualType(), since it doesn't
know what the actual destroyed type would be. Previously, it would
return T.
OKed by rjmccall
llvm-svn: 119334
ensuring that they cover all of their child nodes. There's still a
clang_getCursor()-related issue with CXXFunctionalCastExprs with
CXXConstructExprs as children (see FIXME in the test case); I'll look
at that separately.
llvm-svn: 118132
This adds them where missing, and traces them through PCH. We fix at least one
bug in the extents found by the Index library, and make a lot of refactoring
tools which care about the exact formulation of a constructor call easier to
write. Also some minor cleanups to more consistently follow the friend pattern
instead of the setter pattern when rebuilding a serialized AST.
Patch originally by Samuel Benzaquen.
llvm-svn: 117254
Here's example code:
---
template<class T> class MyClass {
struct S { };
S* NewS() { return new S; }
void DeleteS() { delete NewS(); }
};
---
CXXDeleteExpr::getDestroyedType() on the 'delete NewS()' expression
would crash before this change. Now it returns a dependent type
object. Solution suggested by dgregor.
llvm-svn: 116891
"used", at the time that the default argument itself is used, also
mark destructors that will be called by this expression. This fixes a
regression that I introduced in r113700, which broke WebKit, and fixes
<rdar://problem/8427926>.
llvm-svn: 113883
David Blaikie