assert(a || b && "bad");
since this is safe. This way we avoid a big source of such warnings which in this case are practically useless.
Note that we don't handle *all* cases where precedence wouldn't matter because of constants since
this is a bit costly to check, and IMO clarifying precedence with parentheses is good for
readability in general.
llvm-svn: 119533
that adds parentheses from the main diagnostic down to a new
note. This way, when the fix-it represents a choice between two
options, each of the options is associted with a note. There is no
default option in such cases. For example:
/Users/dgregor/t.c:2:9: warning: & has lower precedence than ==; ==
will be
evaluated first [-Wparentheses]
if (x & y == 0) {
^~~~~~~~
/Users/dgregor/t.c:2:9: note: place parentheses around the &
expression to
evaluate it first
if (x & y == 0) {
^
( )
/Users/dgregor/t.c:2:9: note: place parentheses around the ==
expression to
silence this warning
if (x & y == 0) {
^
( )
llvm-svn: 101249
suggestions follow recovery. Additionally, add a note to these
diagnostics which suggests a fix-it for changing the behavior to what
the user probably meant. Examples:
t.cpp:2:9: warning: & has lower precedence than ==; == will be evaluated first
[-Wparentheses]
if (i & j == k) {
^~~~~~~~
( )
t.cpp:2:9: note: place parentheses around the & expression to evaluate it first
if (i & j == k) {
^
( )
t.cpp:14:9: warning: using the result of an assignment as a condition
without
parentheses [-Wparentheses]
if (i = f()) {
~~^~~~~
( )
t.cpp:14:9: note: use '==' to turn this assignment into an equality
comparison
if (i = f()) {
^
==
llvm-svn: 92975
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Argyrios Kyrtzidis