This adds a copy of the demangler in libcxxabi.
The code also has no dependencies on anything else in LLVM. To enforce
that I added it as another library. That way a BUILD_SHARED_LIBS will
fail if anyone adds an use of StringRef for example.
The no llvm dependency combined with the fact that this has to build
on linux, OS X and Windows required a few changes to the code. In
particular:
No constexpr.
No alignas
On OS X at least this library has only one global symbol:
__ZN4llvm16itanium_demangleEPKcPcPmPi
My current plan is:
Commit something like this
Change lld to use it
Change lldb to use it as the fallback
Add a few #ifdefs so that exactly the same file can be used in
libcxxabi to export abi::__cxa_demangle.
Once the fast demangler in lldb can handle any names this
implementation can be replaced with it and we will have the one true
demangler.
llvm-svn: 280732
llvm-lib is intended to be a lib.exe compatible utility that also
understands bitcode. The implementation lives in a library so that
lld can use it to implement /lib.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10297
llvm-svn: 239434
This will provide the analogous replacements for the PassManagerBuilder
and other code long term. This code is extracted from the opt tool
currently, and I plan to extend it as I build up support for using the
new pass manager in Clang and other places.
Mailing this out for review in part to let folks comment on the terrible names
here. A brief word about why I chose the names I did.
The library is called "Passes" to try and make it clear that it is a high-level
utility and where *all* of the passes come together and are registered in
a common library. I didn't want it to be *limited* to a registry though, the
registry is just one component.
The class is a "PassBuilder" but this name I'm less happy with. It doesn't
build passes in any traditional sense and isn't a Builder-style API at all. The
class is a PassRegisterer or PassAdder, but neither of those really make a lot
of sense. This class is responsible for constructing passes for registry in an
analysis manager or for population of a pass pipeline. If anyone has a better
name, I would love to hear it. The other candidate I looked at was
PassRegistrar, but that doesn't really fit either. There is no register of all
the passes in use, and so I think continuing the "registry" analog outside of
the registry of pass *names* and *types* is a mistake. The objects themselves
are just objects with the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8054
llvm-svn: 231556
Summary:
A simple genetic in-process coverage-guided fuzz testing library.
I've used this fuzzer to test clang-format
(it found 12+ bugs, thanks djasper@ for the fixes!)
and it may also help us test other parts of LLVM.
So why not keep it in the LLVM repository?
I plan to add the cmake build rules later (in a separate patch, if that's ok)
and also add a clang-format-fuzzer target.
See README.txt for details.
Test Plan: Tests will follow separately.
Reviewers: djasper, chandlerc, rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: majnemer, ygribov, dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7184
llvm-svn: 227252
This introduces the ProfileData library and updates llvm-profdata to
use this library for reading profiles. InstrProfReader is an abstract
base class that will be subclassed for both the raw instrprof data
from compiler-rt and the efficient instrprof format that will be used
for PGO.
llvm-svn: 204482
Chandler voiced some concern with checking this in without some
discussion first. Reverting for now.
This reverts r203703, r203704, r203708, and 203709.
llvm-svn: 203723
This provides a library to work with the instrumentation based
profiling format that is used by clang's -fprofile-instr-* options and
by the llvm-profdata tool. This is a binary format, rather than the
textual one that's currently in use.
The tests are in the subsequent commits that use this.
llvm-svn: 203703
This library will be used by clang-query. I can imagine LLDB becoming another
client of this library, so I think LLVM is a sensible place for it to live.
It wraps libedit, and adds tab completion support.
The code is loosely based on the line editor bits in LLDB, with a few
improvements:
- Polymorphism for retrieving the list of tab completions, based on
the concept pattern from the new pass manager.
- Tab completion doesn't corrupt terminal output if the input covers
multiple lines. Unfortunately this can only be done in a truly horrible
way, as far as I can tell. But since the alternative is to implement our
own line editor (which I don't think LLVM should be in the business of
doing, at least for now) I think it may be acceptable.
- Includes a fallback for the case where the user doesn't have libedit
installed.
Note that this uses C stdio, mainly because libedit also uses C stdio.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2200
llvm-svn: 200595
its own library. These functions are bridging between the bitcode reader
and the ll parser which are in different libraries. Previously we didn't
have any good library to do this, and instead played fast and loose with
a "header only" set of interfaces in the Support library. This really
doesn't work well as evidenced by the recent attempt to add timing logic
to the these routines.
As part of this, make them normal functions rather than weird inline
functions, and sink the implementation into the library. Also clean up
the header to be nice and minimal.
This requires updating lots of build system dependencies to specify that
the IRReader library is needed, and several source files to not
implicitly rely upon the header file to transitively include all manner
of other headers.
If you are using IRReader.h, this commit will break you (the header
moved) and you'll need to also update your library usage to include
'irreader'. I will commit the corresponding change to Clang momentarily.
llvm-svn: 177971
Aside from moving the actual files, this patch only updates the build
system and the source file comments under lib/... that are relevant.
I'll be updating other docs and other files in smaller subsequnet
commits.
While I've tried to test this, but it is entirely possible that there
will still be some build system fallout.
Also, note that I've not changed the library name itself: libLLVMCore.a
is still the library name. I'd be interested in others' opinions about
whether we should rename this as well (I think we should, just not sure
what it might break)
llvm-svn: 171359
This introduces a new library to LLVM: libDebugInfo. It will provide debug information
parsing to LLVM. Much of the design and some of the code is taken from the LLDB project.
It also contains an llvm-dwarfdump tool that can dump the abbrevs and DIEs from an
object file. It can be used to write tests for DWARF input and output easily.
llvm-svn: 139627
Rafael Espindola