hanchenye-llvm-project

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Dan Gohman	40503396da	Eliminate more uses of llvm-as and llvm-dis. llvm-svn: 81290	2009-09-08 23:54:48 +00:00
Dan Gohman	a5b9645c4b	Split the Add, Sub, and Mul instruction opcodes into separate integer and floating-point opcodes, introducing FAdd, FSub, and FMul. For now, the AsmParser, BitcodeReader, and IRBuilder all preserve backwards compatability, and the Core LLVM APIs preserve backwards compatibility for IR producers. Most front-ends won't need to change immediately. This implements the first step of the plan outlined here: http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/IntegerOverflow.txt llvm-svn: 72897	2009-06-04 22:49:04 +00:00
Evan Cheng	f6768bd9cb	The coalescer does not coalesce a virtual register to a physical register if any of the physical register's sub-register live intervals overlaps with the virtual register. This is overly conservative. It prevents a extract_subreg from being coalesced away: v1024 = EDI // not killed = = EDI One possible solution is for the coalescer to examine the sub-register live intervals in the same manner as the physical register. Another possibility is to examine defs and uses (when needed) of sub-registers. Both solutions are too expensive. For now, look for "short virtual intervals" and scan instructions to look for conflict instead. This is a small win on x86-64. e.g. It shaves 403.gcc by ~80 instructions. llvm-svn: 61847	2009-01-07 02:08:57 +00:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Dan Gohman

40503396da

Eliminate more uses of llvm-as and llvm-dis.

llvm-svn: 81290

2009-09-08 23:54:48 +00:00

Dan Gohman

a5b9645c4b

Split the Add, Sub, and Mul instruction opcodes into separate

integer and floating-point opcodes, introducing
FAdd, FSub, and FMul.

For now, the AsmParser, BitcodeReader, and IRBuilder all preserve
backwards compatability, and the Core LLVM APIs preserve backwards
compatibility for IR producers. Most front-ends won't need to change
immediately.

This implements the first step of the plan outlined here:
http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/IntegerOverflow.txt

llvm-svn: 72897

2009-06-04 22:49:04 +00:00

Evan Cheng

f6768bd9cb

The coalescer does not coalesce a virtual register to a physical register if any of the physical register's sub-register live intervals overlaps with the virtual register. This is overly conservative. It prevents a extract_subreg from being coalesced away:

v1024 = EDI  // not killed
      =
      = EDI

One possible solution is for the coalescer to examine the sub-register live intervals in the same manner as the physical register. Another possibility is to examine defs and uses (when needed) of sub-registers. Both solutions are too expensive. For now, look for "short virtual intervals" and scan instructions to look for conflict instead.

This is a small win on x86-64. e.g. It shaves 403.gcc by ~80 instructions.

llvm-svn: 61847

2009-01-07 02:08:57 +00:00

3 Commits