This allows explicitly specifying the intended target architecture,
for tests that aren't supposed to be executed, and that don't
require MSVC headers or libraries to be available.
(These tests already implicitly assumed to be built for x86; one
didn't specify anything, assuming x86_64, while the other specified
--arch=32, which only picks the 32 bit variant of the default target
architecture).
Join two comment lines in disassembly.cpp, to keep row numbers
checked in the test unchanged.
This fixes running check-lldb on arm linux.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69031
llvm-svn: 375156
Summary:
When we have a artificial constructor DIE, we currently create from that a global function with the name of that class.
That ends up causing a bunch of funny errors such as "must use 'struct' tag to refer to type 'Foo' in this scope" when
doing `Foo f`. Also causes that constructing a class via `Foo()` actually just calls that global function.
The fix is that when we have an artificial method decl, we always treat it as handled even if we don't create a CXXMethodDecl
for it (which we never do for artificial methods at the moment).
Fixes rdar://55757491 and probably some other radars.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, shafik
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jingham, shafik, labath, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68130
llvm-svn: 375151
Summary: `platform process list -v` on windows doesn't show all the process arguments, making this test useless for that platform
Reviewers: stella.stamenova
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69114
llvm-svn: 375144
POSIX says FILE is a typedef to a structure containing information about
a file. The structure is unspecified, i.e. it may be an incomplete type, as is the case on musl
(`struct _IO_FILE` is an implementation detail that is not exposed).
`LLDB_RECORD_METHOD(..., (FILE *), ...)` transitively uses sizeof(FILE)
and requires the structure to be complete. Change it to
LLDB_RECORD_DUMMY to fix the build failure on musl (regression of
D57475).
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, labath, lawrence_danna
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68872
llvm-svn: 375072
Make it possible to pass a build and install RPATH to
add_lldb_executable instead of having to call lldb_setup_rpaths after
the fact.
This fixes a real issue where setting an install RPATH with
lldb_setup_rpaths would only affect the symroot installation component.
Given that lldb_setup_rpaths sets a target property I would expect this
to be orthogonal to installation components. Regardless, it makes sense
to integrate this functionality in add_lldb_exectable.
llvm-svn: 375068
Now that the VFS knows how to deal with virtual working directories, we
can set the current working directory to the one we recorded during
reproducer capture. This ensures that relative paths are resolved
correctly during replay.
llvm-svn: 375064
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D68549, the actual issue
here seems to be that the BumpPtrAllocator is growing far too slow
because of the 256 different StringPools used as the backend for ConstString.
At the same time the original patch made ConstString allocate memory in
256MiB slabs for the same reason, meaning that the RSS usage of LLDB increased
by a few hundred MiB for all users without bringing any noticeable speedup
for most of them.
llvm-svn: 375062
This patch extends the reproducer to capture the debugger's current
working directory. This information will be used later to set the
current working directory of the VFS.
llvm-svn: 375059
Summary:
ScriptInterpreterPython needs to save and restore sys.stdout and
friends when LLDB runs a python script.
It currently does this using FILE*, which is not optimal. If
whatever was in sys.stdout can not be represented as a FILE*, then
it will not be restored correctly when the script is finished.
It also means that if the debugger's own output stream is not
representable as a file, ScriptInterpreterPython will not be able
to redirect python's output correctly.
This patch updates ScriptInterpreterPython to represent files with
lldb_private::File, and to represent whatever the user had in
sys.stdout as simply a PythonObject.
This will make lldb interoperate better with other scripts or programs
that need to manipulate sys.stdout.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68962
llvm-svn: 374964
Summary:
This is another attempt of D67993.
This change removed hard coded relative paths. This way we can generate correct result when get_python_lib() returns a different path, or LLDB_PYTHON_RELATIVE_PATH is specified directly.
By moving things out of python, we are also able to correctly process more cross compile situations. E.g. .pyd vs .so for Windows.
Subscribers: lldb-commits, mgorny
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68858
llvm-svn: 374953
Summary:
This patch removes FILE* and replaces it with SBFile and FileSP the
SWIG interface for `SBStream.i`. And this is the last one. With
this change, nothing in the python API will can access a FILE* method
on the C++ side.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68960
llvm-svn: 374924
Summary:
This patch eliminates a bunch of boilerplate from
PythonDataObjects, as well as the use of virtual methods.
In my opinion it also makes the Reset logic a lot more
clear and easy to follow. The price is yet another
template. I think it's worth it.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath, zturner
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68918
llvm-svn: 374916
Summary:
This patch converts the swig wrappers for SetInputFileHandle() and friends
to emulate the old behavior using SetInputFile().
This will clear the way for deleting the FILE* typemaps altogether.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68856
llvm-svn: 374912
Summary:
This makes SBFile::GetFile public and adds a SWIG typemap to convert
the result back into a python native file.
If the underlying File itself came from a python file, it is returned
identically. Otherwise a new python file object is created using
the file descriptor.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68737
llvm-svn: 374911
This matches all other architectures listed in the same file.
This fixes debugging aarch64 executables with lldb-server, which
otherwise fails, with log messages like these:
Target::SetArchitecture changing architecture to aarch64 (aarch64-pc-windows-msvc)
Target::SetArchitecture Trying to select executable file architecture aarch64 (aarch64-pc-windows-msvc)
ArchSpec::SetArchitecture sets the vendor to llvm::Triple::PC
for any coff/win32 combination, and if this doesn't match the triple
set by the PECOFF module, things doesn't seem to work with when
using lldb-server.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68939
llvm-svn: 374867
- use a full triple instead of just the architecture (makes the test
pass on non-apple hosts)
- skip the test if the ARM llvm target is not built
llvm-svn: 374863
By default `platform process list` only shows the processes of the current user that lldb-server can parse.
There are several problems:
- apk programs don't have an executable file. They instead use a package name as identifier. We should show them instead.
- each apk also runs under a different user. That's how android works
- because of the user permission, some files like /proc/<pid>/{environ,exe} can't be read.
This results in a very small process list.
This is a local run on my machine
```
(lldb) platform process list
2 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
23291 3177 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
23301 23291 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
```
However, I have 700 processes running at this time.
By implementing a few fallbacks for android, I've expanded this list to 202, filtering out kernel processes, which would presumably appear in this list if the device was rooted.
```
(lldb) platform process list
202 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
...
12647 3208 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
12649 12647 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
12653 982 com.samsung.faceservice
13185 982 com.samsung.vvm
15899 982 com.samsung.android.spay
16220 982 com.sec.spp.push
17126 982 com.sec.spp.push:RemoteDlcProcess
19772 983 com.android.chrome
20209 982 com.samsung.cmh:CMH
20380 982 com.google.android.inputmethod.latin
20879 982 com.samsung.android.oneconnect:Receiver
21212 983 com.tencent.mm
24459 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android wpa_supplicant
25974 982 com.samsung.android.contacts
26293 982 com.samsung.android.messaging
28714 982 com.samsung.android.dialer
31605 982 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32256 982 com.bezobidny
```
Something to notice is that the architecture is unkonwn for all apks. And that's fine, because run-as would be required to gather this information and that would make this entire functionality massively slow.
There are still several improvements to make here, like displaying actual user names, which I'll try to do in a following diff.
Note: Regarding overall apk debugging support from lldb. I'm planning on having lldb spawn lldb-server by itself with the correct user, so that everything works well. The initial lldb-server used for connecting to the remote platform can be reused for such purpose. Furthermore, eventually lldb could also launch that initial lldb-server on its own.
Differential Revision: D68289
llvm-svn: 374853
oops! I cherry-picked rL374820 thinking it was completely
independent of D68737, but it wasn't. It makes an incidental
use of SBFile::GetFile, which is introduced there, so I broke the
build.
The docs say you can commit without review for "obvious". I think
this qualifies. If this kind of fix isn't considered obvious, let
me know and I'll revert instead.
Fixes: rL374820
llvm-svn: 374825
Summary:
This patch replaces the FILE* python bindings for SBInstruction and
SBInstructionList and replaces them with the new, safe SBFile and FileSP
bindings.
I also re-enable `Test_Disassemble_VST1_64`, because now we can use
the file bindings as an additional test of the disassembler, and we
can use the disassembler test as a test of the file bindings.
The bugs referred to in the comments appear to have been fixed. The
radar is closed now and the bugzilla bug does not reproduce with the
instructions given.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68890
llvm-svn: 374820
Summary:
This patch re-types everywhere that passes a File::OpenOptions
as a uint32_t so it actually uses File::OpenOptions.
It also converts some OpenOptions related functions that fail
by returning 0 or NULL into llvm::Expected
split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D68737
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68853
llvm-svn: 374817
Summary:
This patch adds FileSP and SBFile versions of the API methods
ReportEventState and HandleProcessEvent. It points the SWIG
wrappers at these instead of the ones that use FILE* streams.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68546
llvm-svn: 374816
Summary:
The build directory name is based on the test method name, so having
two test methods with the same name in the same test file is a
problem, even if they're in different test classes.
On linux and darwin this conflict can go unnoticed, but windows
has different filesystem semantics and it will fail when one
process tries to delete files still held open by another.
The problem is fixed just by changing the name of one of the test
methods.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath, stella.stamenova
Reviewed By: stella.stamenova
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68951
llvm-svn: 374803
The DWARFExpression is parsing the location lists in about five places.
Of those, only one actually had proper support for base address
selection entries.
Since r374600, llvm has started to produce location expressions with
base address selection entries more aggresively, which caused some tests
to fail.
This patch adds support for these entries to the places which had it
missing, fixing the failing tests. It also adds a targeted test for the
two of the three fixes, which should continue testing this functionality
even if the llvm output changes. I am not aware of a way to write a
targeted test for the third fix (DWARFExpression::Evaluate).
llvm-svn: 374769
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374631
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374626
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374622
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374620
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374609
Martin Storsjo