-no-exec-stack. This was due to it not deriving from the correct
asm info base class and missing the override for the exec
stack section query. Added another line to the noexec test
line to make sure this doesn't regress.
llvm-svn: 227074
clang currently calls MarkVTableUsed() for classes that get their virtual
methods called or that participate in a dynamic_cast. This is unnecessary,
since CodeGen only emits vtables when it generates constructor, destructor, and
vtt code. (*)
Note that Sema::MarkVTableUsed() doesn't cause the emission of a vtable.
Its main user-visible effect is that it instantiates virtual member functions
of template classes, to make sure that if codegen decides to write a vtable
all the entries in the vtable are defined.
While this shouldn't change the behavior of codegen (other than being faster),
it does make clang more permissive: virtual methods of templates (in particular
destructors) end up being instantiated less often. In particular, classes that
have members that are smart pointers to incomplete types will now get their
implicit virtual destructor instantiated less frequently. For example, this
used to not compile but does now compile:
template <typename T> struct OwnPtr {
~OwnPtr() { static_assert((sizeof(T) > 0), "TypeMustBeComplete"); }
};
class ScriptLoader;
struct Base { virtual ~Base(); };
struct Sub : public Base {
virtual void someFun() const {}
OwnPtr<ScriptLoader> m_loader;
};
void f(Sub *s) { s->someFun(); }
The more permissive behavior matches both gcc (where this is not often
observable, since in practice most things with virtual methods have a key
function, and Sema::DefineUsedVTables() skips vtables for classes with key
functions) and cl (which is my motivation for this change) – this fixes
PR20337. See this issue and the review thread for some discussions about
optimizations.
This is similar to r213109 in spirit. r225761 was a prerequisite for this
change.
Various tests relied on "a->f()" marking a's vtable as used (in the sema
sense), switch these to just construct a on the stack. This forces
instantiation of the implicit constructor, which will mark the vtable as used.
(*) The exception is -fapple-kext mode: In this mode, qualified calls to
virtual functions (`a->Base::f()`) still go through the vtable, and since the
vtable pointer off this doesn't point to Base's vtable, this needs to reference
Base's vtable directly. To keep this working, keep referencing the vtable for
virtual calls in apple kext mode.
llvm-svn: 227073
They are referenced from the vtable. (This worked fine, but I couldn't find
an existing test for this. Maybe I didn't look hard enough.)
llvm-svn: 227072
I broke this locally while working on PR20337 and no test caught that. Now
there's coverage for this, and a comment explaining why this is needed.
llvm-svn: 227068
This patch allows clang to have llvm reserve the x18
platform register on AArch64. FreeBSD will use this in the kernel for
per-cpu data but has no need to reserve this register in userland so
will need this flag to reserve it.
This uses llvm r226664 to allow this register to be reserved.
Patch by Andrew Turner.
llvm-svn: 227062
This is initial patch to support MIPS64 object files linking.
The patch just makes some classes more generalized, and rejects
attempts to interlinking O32 and N64 ABI object files.
I try to reuse the current MIPS target related classes as much as
possible because O32 and N64 MIPS ABI are tightly related and share
almost the same set of relocations, GOT, flags etc.
llvm-svn: 227058
physical register that is described in a DBG_VALUE.
In the testcase the DBG_VALUE describing "p5" becomes unavailable
because the register its address is in is clobbered and we (currently)
aren't smart enough to realize that the value is rematerialized immediately
after the DBG_VALUE and/or is actually a stack slot.
llvm-svn: 227056
It appears we have different behavior with and without -mcpu=pwr8 even
with ppc64le defaulting to POWER8. The failure appears as follows:
/home/bb/cmake-llvm-x86_64-linux/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc64le-aggregates.ll:268:14: error: expected string not found in input
; CHECK-DAG: lfs 1, 0([[REG]])
^
<stdin>:497:11: note: scanning from here
ld 3, .LC1@toc@l(3)
^
<stdin>:497:11: note: with variable "REG" equal to "3"
ld 3, .LC1@toc@l(3)
^
<stdin>:514:2: note: possible intended match here
lfs 1, 0(4)
^
Reverting this particular test case change. Nemanja, please have a look
at the reason for the failure.
llvm-svn: 227055
The support is currently limited as we only allow them in the input but do
not emit them in the transformed SCoP due to the possible semantic changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5225
llvm-svn: 227054
Test by Nemanja Ivanovic.
Since ppc64le implies POWER8 as a minimum, it makes sense that the
same features are included. Since the pwr8 processor model will likely
be getting new features until the implementation is complete, I
created a new list to add these updates to. This will include them in
both pwr8 and ppc64le.
Furthermore, it seems that it would make sense to compose the feature
lists for other processor models (pwr3 and up). Per discussion in the
review, I will make this change in a subsequent patch.
In order to test the changes, I've added an additional run step to
test cases that specify -march=ppc64le -mcpu=pwr8 to omit the -mcpu
option. Since the feature lists are the same, the behaviour should be
unchanged.
llvm-svn: 227053
The `Elf_Rel_Impl::setSymbolAndType` method now has the third argument
`IsMips64EL` (like complement methods `getSymbol` and `getType`). While
we do not support linking of MIPS64 ELF object file just pass `false`
to the `setSymbolAndType`.
llvm-svn: 227045
MIPS64 ELF file has a very specific relocation record format. Each
record might specify up to three relocation operations. So the `r_info`
field in fact consists of three relocation type sub-fields and optional
code of "special" symbols.
http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/manuals/4000/007-4658-001/pdf/007-4658-001.pdf
page 40
The patch implements support of the MIPS64 relocation record format in
yaml2obj/obj2yaml tools by introducing new optional Relocation fields:
Type2, Type3, and SpecSym. These fields are recognized only if the
object/YAML file relates to the MIPS64 target.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7136
llvm-svn: 227044
- Added KSHIFTB/D/Q for skx
- Added KORTESTB/D/Q for skx
- Fixed store operation for v8i1 type for KNL
- Store size of v8i1, v4i1 and v2i1 are changed to 8 bits
llvm-svn: 227043
lit.cfg has never supported running .C files, so these tests were never
executed by check-clang. Rename them to .cpp so that they run as part of
the test suite, and minorly tweak two of them that look like they were broken
when checked in to actually pass.
llvm-svn: 227029
This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the
LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example.
There were essentially 3 options for this:
* The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this
commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce
around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression,
etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be
where the actual addition occurred)).
* The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and
certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that
progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for
independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders,
etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y
and z after the respective loads.
The problem with this is that the user would still have to think
fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being
evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan
backtrace.
* The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what
you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going
'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in
lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+
were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will
point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of
its operands.
(actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons,
but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex
assignments and other plain operators right)
llvm-svn: 227027
that library consumers access the instcombine pass directly, they also
(transitively) access the worklist. Also, it would need to be used
directly in order to have a useful utility if we ever want that.
This should fix some warnings since I moved this code. Sorry for the
trouble.
llvm-svn: 227025
Eric Christopher