I noticed this missed bswap optimization in the CGP memcmp() expansion,
and then I saw that we don't have the fold in InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34763
llvm-svn: 306980
We are combining shuffles to bit shifts before unary permutes, which means we can't fold loads plus the destination register is destructive
llvm-svn: 306978
We are combining shuffles to bit shifts before unary permutes, which means we can't fold loads plus the destination register is destructive
The 32-bit shuffles are a bit tricky and will be dealt with in a later patch
llvm-svn: 306977
We are combining shuffles to bit shifts before unary permutes, which means we can't fold loads plus the destination register is destructive
llvm-svn: 306976
this patch updates the cost of addq\subq (add\subtract of vectors of 64bits)
based on the performance numbers of SLM arch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33983
llvm-svn: 306974
This is NFC after rerunning the "update_llc_test_checks.py" tool on the CodeGen X86 tests in order to submit a patch.
Minor differences due to added "End of Function" lines.
Reviewers: zvi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34933
llvm-svn: 306973
Summary: Support G_GLOBAL_VALUE operation. For now most of the PIC configurations not implemented yet.
Reviewers: zvi, guyblank
Reviewed By: guyblank
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34738
Conflicts:
test/CodeGen/X86/GlobalISel/regbankselect-X86_64.mir
llvm-svn: 306972
Summary:
Support vector type G_UNMERGE_VALUES selection.
For now G_UNMERGE_VALUES marked as legal for any type, so nothing to do in legalizer.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, zvi, guyblank
Reviewed By: guyblank
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, guyblank, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33665
llvm-svn: 306971
Summary:
I came across this while thinking about what would happen if one of the operands in this xor pattern was itself a inverted (A & ~B) ^ (~A & B)-> (A^B).
The patterns here assume that the (~a | ~b) will be demorganed to ~(a & b) first. Though I wonder if there's a multiple use case that would prevent the demorgan.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34870
llvm-svn: 306967
-fslp-vectorize-aggressive and -fno-slp-vectorize-aggressive flags back
under this group and test for the warning. Document the future removal
in the ReleaseNotes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34926
llvm-svn: 306965
In C mode clang fails to merge the textually included definition with the one imported from a module. The C lookup rules fail to find the imported definition because its linkage is internal in non C++ mode.
This patch reinstates some of the ODR merging rules for typedefs of anonymous tags for languages other than C++.
Patch by Raphael Isemann and me (D34510).
llvm-svn: 306964
A plain empty entry point function that returns 0 seems to produce
a binary that loads and runs fine in wine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34833
llvm-svn: 306963
Summary:
OS X seems to use older bash version which doesn't suport
_init_completion and compopt, so add support for this.
Reviewers: ruiu, v.g.vassilev, teemperor
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34924
llvm-svn: 306962
Summary: `~/build/bin/clang -f[tab]` was executed without ~ expanded to $HOME, so changed this by expanding ~ to path using eval.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34925
llvm-svn: 306957
Combined directives like 'target parallel' have two captured statements.
Sema has to check the right one from the right direction.
Previously, Sema::IsOpenMPCapturedByRef would return false for mapped
scalars on combined directives. This results in a wrong signature of
the outlined function which triggers an assertion:
void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::FunctionType *, llvm::Value *, ArrayRef<llvm::Value *>, ArrayRef<OperandBundleDef>, const llvm::Twine &): Assertion `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Args[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"' failed.
Fixes PR30975 (and PR31985). New function was taken from clang-ykt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34888
llvm-svn: 306956
Summary:
Changed EABIVersion type from string to llvm::EABI.
It seems it was just a typo and this is intended implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34595
llvm-svn: 306953
Summary:
Un-revert https://reviews.llvm.org/D34868, but with a slight tweak to the
documentation to fix an error -- I had used the wrong syntax for a link.
llvm-svn: 306948
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867.
Add a Clang frontend option to enable optimization remark hotness
thresholds, which were added to LLVM in https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867.
This prevents diagnostics that do not meet a minimum hotness
threshold from being output. When generating optimization remarks for large
codebases with a ton of cold code paths, this option can be used
to limit the optimization remark output at a reasonable size.
Discussion of this change can be read here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/114377.html
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl, hfinkel
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: fhahn, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34868
llvm-svn: 306945
Summary:
This reverts commit 51931072a7c9a52540baf76fc30ef391d2529a2f.
This revert was originally done because the integrations of the new
WindowsResource library into LLD was causing error in chromium, due to
bugs in how resource sections were handled. These bugs were fixed,
meaning that the features may be reintegrated.
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34922
llvm-svn: 306941
This enables us to ensure better LTO and code generation in the face of module linking.
Remove a report_fatal_error from the TargetMachine and replace it with an assert in ARMSubtarget - and remove the test that depended on the error. The assertion will still fire in the case that we were reporting before, but error reporting needs to be in front end tools if possible for options parsing.
llvm-svn: 306939
This commit pretty much rolls back the logic added in r306495
as in the testcase provided we simplify an `icmp` looking through
a PHI that hasn't been mapped yet.
I think instsimplify shouldn't do threading over select/phis or
just looking through phis in general, but this is what we have
now. Also, add a test to prevent this from happening in case somebody
wants to modify this code again.
Briefly discussed with Kyle Butt (thanks Kyle!).
llvm-svn: 306938
With fix for use-after-free errors. We can't add the new branch and
remove the old one until we are done with the Builder constructed for
the block.
llvm-svn: 306937
Summary:
vectorizer-maximize-bandwidth is generally useful in terms of performance. I've tested the impact of changing this to default on speccpu benchmarks on sandybridge machines. The result shows non-negative impact:
spec/2006/fp/C++/444.namd 26.84 -0.31%
spec/2006/fp/C++/447.dealII 46.19 +0.89%
spec/2006/fp/C++/450.soplex 42.92 -0.44%
spec/2006/fp/C++/453.povray 38.57 -2.25%
spec/2006/fp/C/433.milc 24.54 -0.76%
spec/2006/fp/C/470.lbm 41.08 +0.26%
spec/2006/fp/C/482.sphinx3 47.58 -0.99%
spec/2006/int/C++/471.omnetpp 22.06 +1.87%
spec/2006/int/C++/473.astar 22.65 -0.12%
spec/2006/int/C++/483.xalancbmk 33.69 +4.97%
spec/2006/int/C/400.perlbench 33.43 +1.70%
spec/2006/int/C/401.bzip2 23.02 -0.19%
spec/2006/int/C/403.gcc 32.57 -0.43%
spec/2006/int/C/429.mcf 40.35 +0.27%
spec/2006/int/C/445.gobmk 26.96 +0.06%
spec/2006/int/C/456.hmmer 24.4 +0.19%
spec/2006/int/C/458.sjeng 27.91 -0.08%
spec/2006/int/C/462.libquantum 57.47 -0.20%
spec/2006/int/C/464.h264ref 46.52 +1.35%
geometric mean +0.29%
The regression on 453.povray seems real, but is due to secondary effects as all hot functions are bit-identical with and without the flag.
I started this patch to consult upstream opinions on this. It will be greatly appreciated if the community can help test the performance impact of this change on other architectures so that we can decided if this should be target-dependent.
Reviewers: hfinkel, mkuper, davidxl, chandlerc
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: rengolin, sanjoy, javed.absar, bjope, dorit, magabari, RKSimon, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33341
llvm-svn: 306933
Sanjay Patel