minor issues along the way:
- Non-type template parameters of type 'std::nullptr_t' were not
permitted.
- We didn't properly introduce built-in operators for nullptr ==,
!=, <, <=, >=, or > as candidate functions .
To my knowledge, there's only one (minor but annoying) part of nullptr
that hasn't been implemented: catching a thrown 'nullptr' as a pointer
or pointer-to-member, per C++0x [except.handle]p4.
llvm-svn: 131813
Find out that our C++0x status has only one field for noexcept expression and specification together, and that it was accidentally already marked as fully implemented.
This completes noexcept specification work.
llvm-svn: 127701
- Don't publicize a C++0x feature through __has_feature if we aren't
in C++0x mode (even if the feature is available only with a
warning).
- "auto" is not implemented well enough for its __has_feature to be
turned on.
- Fix the test of C++0x __has_feature to actually test what we're
trying to test. Searching for the substring "foo" when our options
are "foo" and "no_foo" doesn't work :)
llvm-svn: 124291
and turn on __has_feature(cxx_rvalue_references). The core rvalue
references proposal seems to be fully implemented now, pending lots
more testing.
llvm-svn: 124169
Turn on the __has_feature switch for variadic templates, document
their completion, and put the ExtWarn into the c++0x-extensions
warning group.
llvm-svn: 123854
disabled with the intent that users can start with them now and not have to change
a thing to have them work when we implement the features.
llvm-svn: 93312
Douglas Gregor