Summary:
I was just granted commit-after-approval access to SVN,
and @clattner recommended I try a test commit.
So, this tweaks the release notes as a test.
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: Wizard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39559
llvm-svn: 317261
Summary:
This is part 3 of 3 of a series of changes to improve Objective-C
linting in clang-tidy.
This adds a new clang-tidy check `objc-forbidden-subclassing` which
ensures clients do not create subclasses of Objective-C classes which
are not designed to be subclassed.
(Note that for code under your control, you should use
__attribute__((objc_subclassing_restricted)) instead -- this
is intended for third-party APIs which cannot be modified.)
By default, the following classes (which are publicly documented
as not supporting subclassing) are forbidden from subclassing:
ABNewPersonViewController
ABPeoplePickerNavigationController
ABPersonViewController
ABUnknownPersonViewController
NSHashTable
NSMapTable
NSPointerArray
NSPointerFunctions
NSTimer
UIActionSheet
UIAlertView
UIImagePickerController
UITextInputMode
UIWebView
Clients can set a CheckOption
`objc-forbidden-subclassing.ClassNames` to a semicolon-separated
list of class names, which overrides this list.
Test Plan: `ninja check-clang-tools`
Patch by Ben Hamilton!
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: saidinwot, Wizard, srhines, mgorny, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39142
llvm-svn: 316744
Summary:
This is part 1 of 3 of a series of changes to improve Objective-C
linting in clang-tidy.
This introduces a new clang-tidy module, `objc`, specifically for
Objective-C / Objective-C++ checks.
The module is currently empty; D39142 adds the first check.
Test Plan: `ninja check-clang-tools`
Patch by Ben Hamilton!
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: Wizard, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39188
llvm-svn: 316643
This check implements the typebased semantic of `gsl::owner`.
Meaning, that
- only `gsl::owner` is allowed to get `delete`d
- `new` expression must be assigned to `gsl::owner`
- function calls that expect `gsl::owner` as argument, must get either an owner
or a newly created and recognized resource (in the moment only `new`ed memory)
- assignment to `gsl::owner` must be either a resource or another owner
- functions returning an `gsl::owner` are considered as factories, and their result
must be assigned to an `gsl::owner`
- classes that have an `gsl::owner`-member must declare a non-default destructor
There are some problems that occur when typededuction is in place.
For example `auto Var = function_that_returns_owner();` the type of `Var` will not be
an `gsl::owner`. This case is catched, and explicitly noted.
But cases like fully templated functions
```
template <typename T>
void f(T t) { delete t; }
// ...
f(gsl::owner<int*>(new int(42)));
```
Will created false positive (the deletion is problematic), since the type deduction
removes the wrapping `typeAlias`.
Codereview in D36354
llvm-svn: 313067
This check implements the typebased semantic of `gsl::owner`.
Meaning, that
- only `gsl::owner` is allowed to get `delete`d
- `new` expression must be assigned to `gsl::owner`
- function calls that expect `gsl::owner` as argument, must get either an owner
or a newly created and recognized resource (in the moment only `new`ed memory)
- assignment to `gsl::owner` must be either a resource or another owner
- functions returning an `gsl::owner` are considered as factories, and their result
must be assigned to an `gsl::owner`
- classes that have an `gsl::owner`-member must declare a non-default destructor
There are some problems that occur when typededuction is in place.
For example `auto Var = function_that_returns_owner();` the type of `Var` will not be
an `gsl::owner`. This case is catched, and explicitly noted.
But cases like fully templated functions
```
template <typename T>
void f(T t) { delete t; }
// ...
f(gsl::owner<int*>(new int(42)));
```
Will created false positive (the deletion is problematic), since the type deduction
removes the wrapping `typeAlias`.
Please give your comments :)
llvm-svn: 313043
This patch will introduce even more aliases for the hicpp-module to already existing
checks and is a follow up for D30383 finishing the other sections.
It fixes a forgotten highlight in hicpp-braces-around-statements.rst, too.
llvm-svn: 312901
Summary:
epoll_create() is better to be replaced by epoll_create1() with EPOLL_CLOEXEC
flag to avoid file descriptor leakage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35367
llvm-svn: 311029
Summary:
epoll_create1() is better to set EPOLL_CLOEXEC flag to avoid file descriptor leakage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35365
llvm-svn: 311028
Summary:
accept4() is better to set SOCK_CLOEXEC flag to avoid file descriptor leakage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35363
llvm-svn: 311027
Summary:
accept() is better to be replaced by accept4() with SOCK_CLOEXEC
flag to avoid file descriptor leakage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35362
llvm-svn: 311024
Summary:
inotify_init1() is better to set IN_CLOEXEC flag to avoid file descriptor leakage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35368
llvm-svn: 310863
Summary:
inotify_init() is better to be replaced by inotify_init1() with IN_CLOEXEC flag to avoid file descriptor leakage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35370
llvm-svn: 310861
Summary:
dup() is better to be replaced by fcntl() to avoid file descriptor leakage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35364
llvm-svn: 310858
This reverts commit r310630.
The new code broke on Windows and was untested. On Linux, it was
selecting the "int" overload of operator<<, which definitely does not
print the right thing when fed a "Mode" char.
llvm-svn: 310661
Summary:
1. Refactor the structure of the code by adding a base class for all close-on-exec checks, which implements most of the needed functions.
2. memfd_create() is better to set MFD_CLOEXEC flag to avoid file descriptor leakage.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, chh, cfe-commits, srhines, mgorny, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35372
llvm-svn: 310630
Summary:
This patch renames checks, check options and changes messages to use correct
term "implicit conversion" instead of "implicit cast" (which has been in use in
Clang AST since ~10 years, but it's still technically incorrect w.r.t. C++
standard).
* performance-implicit-cast-in-loop -> performance-implicit-conversion-in-loop
* readability-implicit-bool-cast -> readability-implicit-bool-conversion
- readability-implicit-bool-cast.AllowConditionalIntegerCasts ->
readability-implicit-bool-conversion.AllowIntegerConditions
- readability-implicit-bool-cast.AllowConditionalPointerCasts ->
readability-implicit-bool-conversion.AllowPointerConditions
Reviewers: hokein, jdennett
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36456
llvm-svn: 310366
Created new module bugprone and placed the check in that.
Finds memset() calls with potential mistakes in their arguments.
Replaces and extends the existing google-runtime-memset-zero-length check.
Cases covered:
* Fill value is a character '0'. Integer 0 might have been intended.
* Fill value is out of char range and gets truncated.
* Byte count is zero. Potentially swapped with the fill value argument.
Patch by: Reka Nikolett Kovacs
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32700
llvm-svn: 308020
Summary: socket() is better to include SOCK_CLOEXEC in its type argument to avoid the file descriptor leakage.
Reviewers: chh, Eugene.Zelenko, alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: chh, alexfh
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34913
llvm-svn: 307818
Summary:
1. Rename android-file-open-flag to android-cloexec-open.
2. Handle a case when the function is passed as an argument of a function-like macro.
Reviewers: chh
Reviewed By: chh
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34633
llvm-svn: 306728
Summary:
A common source of security bugs is code that opens a file descriptors without using the O_CLOEXEC flag. (Without that flag, an opened sensitive file would remain open across a fork+exec to a lower-privileged SELinux domain, leaking that sensitive data.).
Add a new Android module and one checks in clang-tidy.
-- open(), openat(), and open64() should include O_CLOEXEC in their flags argument. [android-file-open-flag]
Links to part2 and part3:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33745https://reviews.llvm.org/D33747
Reviewers: chh, alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: jbcoe, joerg, malcolm.parsons, Eugene.Zelenko, srhines, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, krytarowski
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33304
llvm-svn: 306165
Summary:
Finds compound statements which create next nesting level after `NestingThreshold` and emits a warning.
Do note that it warns about each compound statement that breaches the threshold, but not any of it's sub-statements, to have readable warnings.
I was able to find only one coding style referencing nesting:
- https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/coding-style.html#indentation
> In short, 8-char indents make things easier to read, and have the added benefit of warning you when you’re nesting your functions too deep.
This seems too basic, i'm not sure what else to test. Are more tests needed?
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, sbenza
Reviewed By: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32942
llvm-svn: 305082
Summary:
New checker to replace dynamic exception
specifications
This is an alternative to D18575 which relied on reparsing the decl to
find the location of dynamic exception specifications, but couldn't
deal with preprocessor conditionals correctly without reparsing the
entire file.
This approach uses D20428 to find dynamic exception specification
locations and handles all cases correctly.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, mgehre, malcolm.parsons, mgorny, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits, Eugene.Zelenko, etienneb
Patch by Don Hinton!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20693
llvm-svn: 304977
Add a clang-tidy check for using func__/FUNCTION__ inside lambdas. This
evaluates to the string operator(), which is almost never useful and almost
certainly not what the author intended.
Patch by Bryce Liu!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33497
llvm-svn: 304570
Summary:
This patch makes modernize-use-emplace remove unnecessary make_ calls from push_back calls and turn them into emplace_back -- the same way make_pair calls are handled.
Custom make_ calls can be removed for custom tuple-like types -- two new options that control that are `TupleTypes` and `TupleMakeFunctions`. By default, the check removes calls to `std::make_pair` and `std::make_tuple`.
Eq.
```
std::vector<std::tuple<int, char, bool>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_tuple(1, 'A', true)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 'A', true);
```
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, Prazek, hokein
Reviewed By: Prazek
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32690
llvm-svn: 303145
Summary:
This patch makes modernize-use-emplace remove unnecessary make_ calls from push_back calls and turn them into emplace_back -- the same way make_pair calls are handled.
Custom make_ calls can be removed for custom tuple-like types -- two new options that control that are `TupleTypes` and `TupleMakeFunctions`. By default, the check removes calls to `std::make_pair` and `std::make_tuple`.
Eq.
```
std::vector<std::tuple<int, char, bool>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_tuple(1, 'A', true)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 'A', true);
```
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, Prazek, hokein
Reviewed By: Prazek
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32690
llvm-svn: 303139
This check flags postfix operator++/-- declarations,
where the return type is not a const object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32743
llvm-svn: 302637
Summary:
When there is a push_back with a call to make_pair, turn it into emplace_back and remove the unnecessary make_pair call.
Eg.
```
std::vector<std::pair<int, int>> v;
v.push_back(std::make_pair(1, 2)); // --> v.emplace_back(1, 2);
```
make_pair doesn't get removed when explicit template parameters are provided, because of potential problems with type conversions.
Reviewers: Prazek, aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: Prazek, alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32395
llvm-svn: 301651
This check will find occurrences of ``std::random_shuffle`` and replace it with ``std::shuffle``. In C++17 ``std::random_shuffle`` will no longer be available and thus we need to replace it.
Example of case that it fixes
```
std::vector<int> v;
// First example
std::random_shuffle(vec.begin(), vec.end());
```
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman, alexfh, malcolm.parsons, mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30158
llvm-svn: 301167
Summary:
The "performance-inefficient-vector-operation" check finds vector oprations in
for-loop statements which may cause multiple memory reallocations.
This is the first version, only detects typical for-loop:
```
std::vector<int> v;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
v.push_back(i);
}
// or
for (int i = 0; i < v2.size(); ++i) {
v.push_back(v2[i]);
}
```
We can extend it to handle more cases like for-range loop in the future.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: zaks.anna, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, cfe-commits, djasper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31757
llvm-svn: 300534
Ben Hamilton