I don't think this will be visible just yet on <clang.llvm.org/docs/>
since I don't think that the necessary server-side setup has taken
place.
Don't shoot me over the theme. I don't want to duplicate LLVM's theme
into the clang repo at the moment, so I just used one of Sphinx's
default themes.
llvm-svn: 170042
has inconsistent ownership with the backing ivar, point the error location to the
ivar.
Pointing to the ivar (instead of the @synthesize) is better since this is where a fix is needed.
Also provide the location of @synthesize via a note.
This also fixes the problem where an auto-synthesized property would emit an error without
any location.
llvm-svn: 170039
should only occur on invalid input. Instruction matching errors aren't
unexpected, so we can't rely on the AsmParsers HadError variable directly.
rdar://12840278
llvm-svn: 170037
My variadics patch, r169588, changed these calls to typically be
bitcasts rather than calls to a supposedly variadic function.
This totally subverted a hack where we intentionally dropped
excess arguments from such calls in order to appease the inliner
and a "warning" from the optimizer. This patch extends the hack
to also work with bitcasts, as well as teaching it to rewrite
invokes.
llvm-svn: 170034
structures to and from YAML using traits. The first client will
be the test suite of lld. The documentation will show up at:
http://llvm.org/docs/YamlIO.html
llvm-svn: 170019
predictable when compiled on at least one non-PowerPC host. Source of
nondeterminism not apparent. Restrict the test to build on PowerPC hosts
for now while looking into the issue further.
llvm-svn: 170016
Emitting a warning when defining a summary or a synthetic provider and the function/class name provided does not correspond to a valid scripting object
Also using this chance to edit a few error messages from weird "internal error" markers to actual user-legible data!
llvm-svn: 170013
Added a "step-in-target" flag to "thread step-in" so if you have something like:
Process 28464 stopped
* thread #1: tid = 0x1c03, function: main , stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
frame #0: 0x0000000100000e08 a.out`main at main.c:62
61
-> 62 int A6 = complex (a(4), b(5), c(6)); // Stop here to step targetting b and hitting breakpoint.
63
and you want to get into "complex" skipping a, b and c, you can do:
(lldb) step -t complex
Process 28464 stopped
* thread #1: tid = 0x1c03, function: complex , stop reason = step in
frame #0: 0x0000000100000d0d a.out`complex at main.c:44
41
42 int complex (int first, int second, int third)
43 {
-> 44 return first + second + third; // Step in targetting complex should stop here
45 }
46
47 int main (int argc, char const *argv[])
llvm-svn: 170008
PowerPC target. This is the last of the four models, so we now have
full TLS support.
This is mostly a straightforward extension of the general dynamic model.
I had to use an additional Chain operand to tie ADDIS_DTPREL_HA to the
register copy following ADDI_TLSLD_L; otherwise everything above the
ADDIS_DTPREL_HA appeared dead and was removed.
As before, there are new test cases to test the assembly generation, and
the relocations output during integrated assembly. The expected code
gen sequence can be read in test/CodeGen/PowerPC/tls-ld.ll.
There are a couple of things I think can be done more efficiently in the
overall TLS code, so there will likely be a clean-up patch forthcoming;
but for now I want to be sure the functionality is in place.
Bill
llvm-svn: 170003
We don't handle array destructors correctly yet, but we now apply the same
hack (explicitly destroy the first element, implicitly invalidate the rest)
for multidimensional arrays that we already use for linear arrays.
<rdar://problem/12858542>
llvm-svn: 170000
call sites as tail calls unconditionally. While it's theoretically true that
this is just an optimization, it's an optimization that we very much want to
happen even at -O0, or else ARC applications become substantially harder to
debug. See r169796 for the llvm/fast-isel side of things.
rdar://12553082
llvm-svn: 169996
been used in the first place. It simply was passed to the function and to the
recursive invocations. Simply drop the parameter and update the callers for the
new signature.
Patch by Saleem Abdulrasool!
llvm-svn: 169988
Sean Silva