in the super class, do not issue the warning about property
in current class's protocol will not be auto synthesized.
// rdar://18179833
llvm-svn: 216769
Do not warn when property declared in class's protocol will be auto-synthesized
by its uper class implementation because super class has also declared this
property while this class has not. Continue to warn if current class
has declared the property also (because this declaration will not result
in a 2nd synthesis).
rdar://18152478
llvm-svn: 216753
- If only partial invalidators exist and there are no full invalidators in @implementation, report every ivar that has
not been invalidated. (Previously, we reported the first Ivar in the list, which could actually have been invalidated
by a partial invalidator. The code assumed you cannot have only partial invalidators.)
- Do not report missing invalidation method declaration if a partial invalidation method declaration exists.
llvm-svn: 180170
The missing definition check should be in the same category as the
missing ivar validation - in this case, the intent is to invalidate in
the given class, as described in the declaration, but the implementation
does not perform the invalidation. Whereas the MissingInvalidationMethod
checker checks the cases where the method intention is not to
invalidate. The second checker has potential to have a much higher false
positive rate.
llvm-svn: 174787
The new annotation allows having methods that only partially invalidate
IVars and might not be called from the invalidation methods directly
(instead, are guaranteed to be called before the invalidation occurs).
The checker is going to trust the programmer to call the partial
invalidation method before the invalidator.This is common in cases when
partial object tear down happens before the death of the object.
llvm-svn: 174779
assertions.
To ensure that custom assertions/conditional would also be supported,
just check if the ivar that needs to be invalidated or set to nil is
compared against 0.
Unfortunately, this will not work for code containing 'assert(IvarName)'
llvm-svn: 172147
In some cases, we just pick any ivar that needs invalidation and attach
the warning to it. Picking the first from DenseMap of pointer keys was
triggering non-deterministic output.
llvm-svn: 172134
Restructured the checker so that it could easily find two new classes of
issues:
- when a class contains an invalidatable ivar, but no declaration of an
invalidation method
- when a class contains an invalidatable ivar, but no definition of an
invalidation method in the @implementation.
The second case might trigger some false positives, for example, when
the method is defined in a category.
llvm-svn: 172104
When a property is "inherited" through both a parent class and directly
through a protocol, we should not require the child to invalidate it
since the backing ivar belongs to the parent class.
(Fixes radar://12913734)
llvm-svn: 171769
the validation occurred.
The original implementation was pessimistic - we assumed that ivars
which escape are invalidated. This version is optimistic, it assumes
that the ivars will always be explicitly invalidated: either set to nil
or sent an invalidation message.
llvm-svn: 164868
This checker is annotation driven. It checks that the annotated
invalidation method accesses all ivars of the enclosing objects that are
objects of type, which in turn contains an invalidation method.
This is driven by
__attribute((annotation("objc_instance_variable_invalidator")).
llvm-svn: 164716
Fariborz Jahanian