The patch was generated using this command:
$ clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter=.*clang-tidy.* -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-header-guard clang-tidy.*
$ svn revert --recursive clangt-tidy/llvm/
(to revert a few buggy fixes)
llvm-svn: 231669
Summary:
This patch makes the check work better for LLVM code:
* always fix existing #endif comments
* use one space before the comment (+allow customization for other styles)
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5795
llvm-svn: 219789
If we had many header files we would attach the fix-it for all files to all
warnings, oops. This is harmless 99.9% of the time but can confuse the rewriter
in some edge cases. Sadly I failed to create a small test case for this.
While there move fix-its instead of copying.
llvm-svn: 217951
Summary:
Each check can implement readOptions and storeOptions methods to read
and store custom options. Each check's options are stored in a local namespace
to avoid name collisions and provide some sort of context to the user.
Reviewers: bkramer, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5296
llvm-svn: 217661
we can also fix the original header guard.
We still allow an _ at the end of a header guard since it's so common, but
remove it now when the #endif comment is changed.
llvm-svn: 216462
The implementation is split into a generic part and a LLVM-specific part.
Other codebases can implement it with their own style. The specific features
supported are:
- Verification (and fixing) of header guards against a style based on the file path
- Automatic insertion of header guards for headers that are missing them
- A warning when the header guard doesn't enable our fancy header guard optimization
(e.g. when there's an include preceeding the guard)
- Automatic insertion of a comment with the guard name after #endif.
For the LLVM style we disable #endif comments for now, they're not very common
in the codebase. We also only flag headers in the include directories, there
doesn't seem to be a common style outside.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4867
llvm-svn: 215548
Richard Smith