he following snippet doesn't build when using gcc and libc++:
#include <string>
void f(const std::string& s) { s.begin(); }
#include <vector>
void AppendTo(const std::vector<char>& v) { v.begin(); }
The problem is that __wrap_iter has a private constructor. It lists vector<>
and basic_string<> as friends, but gcc seems to ignore this for vector<> for
some reason. Declaring vector before the friend declaration in __wrap_iter is
enough to work around this problem, so do that. With this patch, I'm able to
build chromium/android with libc++. Without it, two translation units fail to
build. (iosfwd already provides a forward declaration of basic_string.)
As far as I can tell, this is due to a gcc bug, which I filed as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64816.
Fixes PR22355.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7201
llvm-svn: 227226
Things done in this patch:
1. Make __debug include __config since it uses macros from it.
2. The current method of defining _LIBCPP_ASSERT is prone to redefinitions. Move
the null _LIBCPP_ASSERT definition into the __debug header to prevent this.
3. Remove external <__debug> include gaurds. <__debug> guards almost all of its
contents internally. There is no reason to be doing it externally.
This patch should not change any functionality.
llvm-svn: 215332
1. I had been detecting and trapping iterator == and \!= among iterators
in different containers as an error. But the trapping itself is actually
an error.
Consider:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
template <class C>
void
display(const C& c)
{
std::cout << "{";
bool first = true;
for (const auto& x : c)
{
if (\!first)
std::cout << ", ";
first = false;
std::cout << x;
}
std::cout << "}\n";
}
int
main()
{
typedef std::vector<int> V;
V v1 = {1, 3, 5};
V v2 = {2, 4, 6};
display(v1);
display(v2);
V::iterator i = std::find(v1.begin(), v1.end(), 1);
V::iterator j = std::find(v2.begin(), v2.end(), 2);
if (*i == *j)
i = j; // perfectly legal
// ...
if (i \!= j) // the only way to check
v2.push_back(*i);
display(v1);
display(v2);
}
It is legal to assign an iterator from one container to another of the
same type. This is required to work. One might want to test whether or
not such an assignment had been made. The way one performs such a check
is using the iterator's ==, \!= operator. This is a logical and necessary
function and does not constitute an error.
2. I had a header circular dependence bug when _LIBCPP_DEBUG2 is defined.
This caused a problem in several of the libc++ tests.
Fixed.
3. There is a serious problem when _LIBCPP_DEBUG2=1 at the moment in that
std::basic_string is inoperable. std::basic_string uses __wrap_iterator
to implement its iterators. __wrap_iterator has been rigged up in debug
mode to support vector. But string hasn't been rigged up yet. This means
that one gets false positives when using std::string in debug mode. I've
upped std::string's priority in www/debug_mode.html.
llvm-svn: 187636
lvalues, nor can one take the address of an xvalue, by adding
appropriate static_cast's (in the first case) and a temporary (in the
second case).
llvm-svn: 124255
Marshall Clow